Empowerment is een centraal begrip in het hedendaagse pedagogisch denken en handelen. In dit artikel wordt empowerment besproken in het licht van de positieve psychologie: een stroming in de psychologie die bestudeerd hoe het welbevinden en optimaal functioneren van mensen kan worden bevorderd.In de positieve psychologie heeft recent een paradigmaverschuiving plaatsgevonden. De interactie tussen individu en omgeving wordt niet langer begrepen in termen van causaliteit maar vanuit het narratief van complexiteit. In dit narratief wordt de interactie tussen individu en omgeving opgevat als een complex dynamisch systeem waarin er zelden sprake is vandirecte oorzaak-gevolg relaties (lineaire causaliteit). Bij het ontstaan van empowerment spelen zowel multi-causaliteit, multi-finaliteit als circulaire causaliteit een rol. Empowerment wordt in dit artikel dan ook niet beschouwd als een inherent psychisch kenmerk van een individu, maar als iets dat zich vormt op basis van iemands dagelijkse ervaringen in interactie met zijn socialeomgeving.In dit artikel onderzoeken we wat het denken vanuit het perspectief van complex dynamische systemen betekent voor de pedagogische visie op empowerment en welke gevolgen dit heeft voor interventies in de pedagogische praktijk.TREFWOORDENEmpowerment, Complexiteit, Complex Dynamische Systemen, Positieve Psychologie, Sociale interventies, Zelfregie, Eigen Kracht, AgencyABSTRACT- ENGLISHIn the Netherlands, empowerment plays a major role in the daily work of pedagogues and in social policies. Empowerment is closely related to the assumptions of positive psychology. This is a scientific approach that focuses on strengths instead of weaknesses, building the good in life instead of repairing the bad. Empowerment also is about taking control of one’s life and by doingso enhancing wellbeing. Therefore empowerment fits the concept of positive psychology.Recently there has been a paradigm shift in positive psychology where research is going beyond the individual person as the primary focus of enquiry and is looking more deeply at the groups and systems in which people are embedded: less in terms of causality and more as a narrative of complexity. In this narrative, the interaction between individuals and the environment is seen as a complex dynamic system.In this article we discuss empowerment and agency in the light of complexity and the implications for the daily work of pedagogues.
Compared to macroeconomic factors, the financial situation of the individual may provide better insight into the relationship between debt and crime. However, the relationship between debt and crime is still unclear and little is known about the causality of this relationship and the factors that influence it. To obtain more insight into this relationship, a systematic and scoping literature review was conducted. Five articles were analyzed in the systematic review, and 24 articles in the scoping review. The results of the systematic review show a strong association between debt and crime whereby debt is a risk factor for crime, especially for recidivism and regardless of the type of crime, and crime is a risk factor for debt. The scoping review provided additional and in-depth insight, and placed the results of the systematic review in a broader perspective. Moreover, it emphasized the prevalence of debt among offenders, regardless of age, and identified the factors that influence the relationship between debt and crime.
Since the arrival of cinema, film theorists have studied how spectators perceive the representations that the medium offers to our senses. Early film theorists have bent their heads over what cinema is, how cinema can be seen as art, but also over what cinema is capable of. One of the earliest film theorists, Hugo Münsterberg argued in 1916 that the uniqueness of cinema, or as he calls it photoplay, lies in the way it offers the possibility to represent our mental perception and organisation of the reality, or the world we live in: “the photoplay tells us the human story by overcoming the forms of the outer world, namely, space, time, and causality, and by adjusting the events to the forms of the inner world, namely, attention, memory, imagination, and emotion” (Münsterberg [1916] 2004, 402)
