Due to a growing challenge to feed the world’s population and an increased awareness to minimize the impact of our food choices on climate change, a more plant-based diet has gained popularity with a growing number of plant-based products on the market. To stimulate a plant-based diet that also improves long-term health, data are needed to monitor whether these products are healthy alternatives to animal-based foods. Therefore, this study inventoried 916 plant-based meat, fish, and dairy alternatives from eight Dutch supermarkets. The nutritional quality of each product was assessed by (1) the Dutch food-based dietary guidelines and (2) the Nutri-Score. The results show that over 70% of meat, fish, and dairy alternatives have an A/B Nutri-Score (indicating high nutritional quality), but do not comply with the Dutch dietary guidelines. This is mainly due to high salt and low vitamin B12 and iron content (meat and fish alternatives) or low protein and calcium levels (dairy alternatives). In conclusion, the majority of plant-based products are nutritionally not full alternatives of the animal-based equivalents; however, there are still opportunities for reformulation. To aid the consumer in making healthy plant-based food choices, a better alignment between the Nutri-Score and the recommended dietary guidelines is needed.
MULTIFILE
Malnutrition, especially among the elderly in the healthcare environment, is a prevalent problem in The Netherlands, affecting both patients and the healthcare budget. Although oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are often used to restore the nutritional status of a patient, the evaluated current available literature failed to show a coherent picture of the effectiveness of ONS in malnourished patients. In the present study, we used a qualitative research approach to gain insight in the treatment of malnutrition via ONS and food snacks in a single non-academic teaching hospital. Twelve semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (such as dieticians, nurses, care-assistants, physician) were held. Results indicated opportunities for further improvement, for example through the introduction of a screening tool for malnutrition in cognitive impaired patients, better timing for handing out the daily meal plan forms, and improved range and provision of snacks. The stakeholders indicated that taste and physical properties of ONS, but also social environment as well as the physical/mental state and motivation of a patient are important facilitators which should be considered during the prescription. In conclusion, to optimize treatment of malnutrition using ONS and food snacks, the above mentioned opportunities to better match the needs of malnourished patients have to be tackled. Involvement of the different stakeholders within the healthcare facility will be important to implement required changes in nutritional practice.
MULTIFILE
Insight into protein requirements of intensive care unit (ICU) patients is urgently needed, but at present, it is unrealistic to define protein requirements for different diagnostic groups of critical illness or at different stages of illness. No large randomized controlled trials have randomized protein delivery, adequately addressed energy intake, and evaluated relevant clinical outcomes. As a pragmatic approach, experimental studies have focused on protein requirements of heterogeneous ICU patients. Data are scarce and the absolute value of protein requirements therefore is an approximation. Experimental studies indicate a protein requirement of >1.2 g/kg protein, which is supported by several outcome-based observational studies. Protein intake levels of up to 2.0-2.5 g/kg appear to be safe. A higher level of personalized treatment, within 1.2 and 2.5 g/kg, must involve identification of patients with low muscle protein mass that might benefit most from adequate protein nutrition in the ICU.
