Background Fall prevention programs have been proven effective in reducing falls and fall-related injuries in specific target groups and settings. However, implementing these programs on a larger scale often requires adjustments for feasibility. This study assessed the effectiveness of a nationally implemented fall prevention intervention compared to usual care in community-dwelling older adults. Methods This single-blinded, multicentre randomized controlled trial included 264 community-dwelling non- and pre-frail adults, aged 65 years or older with an increased fall risk. The intervention group participated in the In Balance intervention and the control group received general physical activity recommendations. Primary outcomes were the number of falls and fall-related injuries over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the Timed Up and Go and Four Stage Balance Test, and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. We imputed missing data by multiple imputation, and analysed outcomes using generalized linear- and linear mixed-effects models. Analyses were done for the total group and stratified for frailty status. Results The mean number of falls per person over 12 months was not statistically different between the intervention and control group (respectively 1.67 (SE 0.24) and 1.98 (0.37); incidence rate ratio 0.85 (95% CI 0.51-1.43)), nor the mean number of fall-related injuries (respectively 0.70 (SE 0.11) and 0.97 (0.18); incidence rate ratio 0.73 (95% CI 0.44-1.19)). Secondary outcomes also showed no significant differences between group, frailty status and over time. Conclusions Although the number of falls and fall-related injuries was lower among In Balance participants, and balance, mobility, physical function, and emotional well-being improved, these differences were not statistically significant. Impact statement The implemented In Balance program appears to be less effective than a priori assumed, possibly due to insufficient adherence to the program in practice.
The studies in this thesis aim to increase understanding of the effects of various characteristics of scientific news about a common chronic disease, i.e., diabetes, on the cognitive responses (e.g., emotions, attitudes, intentions) of diabetes patients. The research questions presented in this thesis are guided by the Health Belief Model, a theoretical framework developed to explain and predict healthrelated behaviours based on an individual’s beliefs and attitudes. The model asserts that perceived barriers to a recommended health behavior, advantages of the behavior, self-efficacy in executing the behavior, and disease severity and personal susceptibility to the disease are important predictors of a health behavior. Communication is one of the cues to action (i.e., stimuli) that may trigger the decision-making process relating to accepting a medical or lifestyle recommendation.
Background Evidence about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on existing health inequalities is emerging. This study explored differences in mental health, sense of coherence (SOC), sense of community coherence (SOCC), sense of national coherence (SONC), and social support between low and high socioeconomic (SES) groups, and the predictive value of these predictors for mental health. participants and procedure A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey in the Netherlands in October 2021, comprising a total of 91 respondents (n = 41, low SES; n = 50, high SES). results There were no differences in mental health, SOC, SOCC, SONC, and social support between the groups. SOC was a predictor for mental health in both groups and SOCC for the low SES group. conclusions We found that both SOC and SOCC predict mental health during the pandemic. In the article we reflect on possible pathways for strengthening these resources for mental health.
