OBJECTIVE: Evaluate clinical outcome of early cyclic intravenous pamidronate treatment in children with moderate-to-severe osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), commenced before three years of age.METHODS: A retrospective review of 17 patients with moderate-to-severe OI. Development, anthropometry, fracture history, bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemistry were collected at baseline, 12 and 24 months.RESULTS: Four had OI type I, eleven had type III, one OI-FKBP10 type and one OI type V. Mean age at start of pamidronate was 14 ± 11 months. Pamidronate ranged from 6 to 12 mg/kg/year. No adverse reaction apart from fever and vomiting was noted. Long bone fracture decreased from a mean of 10.4/year to 1.2/year after 12 months and 1.4/year after 24 months (p = 0.02). Lumbar spine age- and height-matched BMD Z-scores increased (p < 0.005). Sixteen with vertebral compression fractures at baseline all showed improved vertebral shape (p < 0.001). Concavity index, likewise, improved (p < 0.005). Motor milestones compared to historical data show earlier attainment in rolling over, crawling, pulling to stand and walking independently but not sitting.CONCLUSION: Cyclic intravenous pamidronate, started under 3 years of age in children with moderate-to-severe OI, was well tolerated and associated with an increase in lumbar spine BMD, reduced fracture frequency, vertebral remodelling and attainment of motor milestones at an earlier age.
DOCUMENT
Control methods are applied worldwide to reduce predation on livestock by European red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Lethal methods can inflict suffering; however, moral debate about their use is lacking. Non-lethal methods can also inflict suffering and can unintentionally lead to death, and yet both the welfare consequences and ethical perspectives regarding their use are rarely discussed. The aim of this study was to investigate the animal welfare consequences, the level of humaneness, the ethical considerations and the moral implications of the global use of fox control methods according to Tom Regan’s animal rights view and Peter Singer’s utilitarian view. According to Regan, foxes ought not to be controlled by either lethal or potentially harmful non-lethal methods because this violates the right of foxes not to be harmed or killed. According to Singer, if an action maximises happiness or the satisfaction of preferences over unhappiness or suffering, then the action is justified. Therefore, if and only if the use of fox control methods can prevent suffering and death in livestock in a manner that outweighs comparable suffering and death in foxes is one morally obligated t
MULTIFILE
