De arbeidsmarkt is continu in ontwikkeling, leidend tot een steeds veranderende vraag naar competenties en banen. Dit vraagt naast beroepsgerichte vaardigheden en kennis over veerkracht en wendbaarheid van professionals. Van de student wordt daarom verwacht dat die zich ontwikkeld in zelfgereguleerd (ZGL) leren. ZGL gaat over regie van het eigen leerproces: studenten bepalen zelf hoe tot leerresultaten te komen, deze te evalueren en sturen het leerproces zelf bij. Voor opleidingen is het de vraag hoe ze ZGL kunnen begeleiden en bevorderen. Dit behoeft inzicht in leergedrag, patronen hierin en bewustzijn over hoe deze inzichten gebruikt kunnen worden om ZGL te ondersteunen en het leerproces te begeleiden. In dit onderzoek is geïnventariseerd of de data die studenten in de elektronische leeromgeving (ELO) achterlaten een indicatie kan geven over het leerproces en ZGL van de student. Om de ingewikkelde patronen uit de data te halen, zijn de data uit de ELO met behulp van AItechnieken geanalyseerd. Hiermee kon het leerproces van studenten in verschillende categorieën worden onderverdeeld. De categorieën geven een eerste indicatie over het ZGL van de student. Verder onderzoek is benodigd, ook om te onderzoeken wat dit betekent voor de ondersteuning van studenten in hun leerproces.
Full text beschikbaar met HU-account. Sinds de opkomst van sociale media spelen de toepassing en het bereik ervan in toenemende mate een rol, ook bij rampen en crises. De vraag rijst dan hoe daar in de crisiscommunicatie en het crisismanagement effectief mee om te gaan. Uit literatuuronderzoek en een analyse van een viertal Nederlandse casus blijkt dat, hoewel sommige officiële instanties nog steeds verrast kunnen worden door de snelle stroom van berichten en de effecten die dat met zich meebrengt, er al veel is geleerd over het omgaan met en benutten van sociale media in crisissituaties. Professionals dealing with crises are more or less forced to a next level of crisis communication and crisis management. This is because of the influence of social media. Messages on Twitter, Facebook and other social media can have a significant impact on the course of developments during a crisis. Sometimes in a positive way, when help is mobilized quickly and people can be informed almost instantly. On other occasions the impact is more negative, when for instance rumors lead to false accusations or threats. In the past several years, crisis management authorities have built up more experience with the use and application of social media and monitoring tools. There are still cases where officials and professionals are taken by surprise because of the shift stream of messages and their impact on public opinion and crisis control. But also lessons have been learned, e.g. in terms of online and offline reactions, cooperation with the public, and rumor control. This article gives an overview of research results in literature and summarizes the outcomes of a case study research project
LINK
This paper puts forward a conceptual proposition that ties the discourses on ‘urban memory’ (Stillman and Johanson, 2009; Ringas, Christopoulou, Stefanidakis., 2011; Loughran, Fine & Hunter, 2015), sensory ethnography (Pink 2017 ), and counter-mapping (Crampton and Krygier 2018; ) with digital methods (Rogers, Sánchez-Querubín, and Kil, 2015). As an ‘interventionist’ approach, we understand co-producing counter (dynamic) maps with local stakeholders (actors), coupled with sensory and sentient data as a way of capturing the memory of urban peripheral landscapes (through intervention and participation) and thus creating archival knowledge.Urban memory is often understood as a form of collective memory that isconstituted by individual experiences within the place itself and through its historyand social environment (Ringas et al., 2011). With rapid changes in digitaltechnologies, digital and material have become “inseparate and entangled inenvironments people move and navigate their lives through'' (Pink and Fors, 2017).Memories are “evoked with material engagement with devices” which “opens up afield of sensory and affective engagement” research (ibid). While Pink and Forspropose to follow such engagement in a mundane and everyday setting, seen as anon-representational, phenomenological approach, we put forward a mixedmethods approach that connects sensory and sentient data (as agents) with the largerenvironmental context.Urban areas are often conceptualized as sites of ‘creative destruction’, in between stability and change, space (that can be developed) and place (that is lived in), often subjected to planning, regulation, and economic forces (Batty, 2007). This is especially true for urban areas that are located outside of the ‘center’ or in the cities’ periphery. These areas have experienced an endless cycle of deconstruction and reconstruction often witnessed and captured by local inhabitants, creatives, and activists. Currently, many of the peripheral areas are emancipating, bringing forward and openly communicating their complexities, values, and engaging various stakeholders in their regeneration efforts (which happens in a broader context of many European cities repositioning themselves in more polycentric and polyphonic ways, (Scott, 2015).To be able to capture the memory of ever-changing, ‘built a new’ urban places, we put forward counter (dynamic) mapping using digital methods as complemented with sensory and sentient data generated through interactions with digital technologies. Building on Crampton’s notion of maps (Crampton and Krygier, 2018), cartography is understood as existence (becoming) rather than essence (fixed ontology). Maps are therefore taken not as ‘objects’, but as performative practices. Digital methods, on the other hand, enable us to understand dynamic place-making, through ‘tracing’ the stakeholders (actors) and their relations overtime to capture the ways the urban environment gets performed.To clarify with an example, in Spinoza Imaginaries Lab & Cafe situated inAmsterdam Southeast we have been capturing the ever changing urbanenvironment in partnership with local stakeholders (actors), mapping their evolvingrelationships (and grouping) using the IssueCrawler and sentient data co-gatheredby researchers and students, with the clear understanding that to be able to capturea place, it is important to map the vernacular knowledge of that place (imaginaries,including art, movies, unrealized plans and initiatives, etc.). We propose this mixedmethods approach as an epistemological practice geared towards archiving thedynamic state of urban peripheral landscapes.
MULTIFILE
