Data is widely recognized as a potent catalyst for advancing healthcare effectiveness, increasing worker satisfaction, and mitigating healthcare costs. The ongoing digital transformation within the healthcare sector promises to usher in a new era of flexible patient care, seamless inter-provider communication, and data-informed healthcare practices through the application of data science. However, more often than not data lacks interoperability across different healthcare institutions and are not readily available for analysis. This inability to share data leads to a higher administrative burden for healthcare providers and introduces risks when data is missing or when delays occur. Moreover, medical researchers face similar challenges in accessing medical data due to thedifficulty of extracting data from applications, a lack of standardization, and the required data transformations before it can be used for analysis. To address these complexities, a paradigm shift towards a data-centric application landscape is essential, where data serves as the bedrock of the healthcare infrastructure and is application agnostic. In short, a modern way to think about data in general is to go from an application driven landscape to a data driven landscape, which will allow for better interoperability and innovative healthcare solutions.In the current project the research group Digital Transformation at Hanze University of Applied Sciences works together with industry partners to build an openEHR implementation for a Groningen-based mental healthcare provider.
Trying to control multiple computers in live performances is a challenging task. Often computers intercommunicate using fixed or manual parameters. However when projects expand across many devices this is hard to maintain. Especially in situations where the parameters tend to change. We propose a new protocol which facilitates flexibility and autonomous setups in an orchestrated environment.
A major challenge for disaster scholars and policymakers is to understand the power dimension in response networks, particularly relating to collaboration and coordination. We propose a conceptual framework to study interests and negotiations in and between various civic and professional, response networks drawing on the concepts of “programming” and “switching” proposed by Manuel Castells in his work on the network society. Programming in disaster response refers to the ability to constitute response networks and to program/reprogram them in terms of the goals assigned to the network. Switching is the ability to connect different net-works by sharing common goals and combining resources. We employ these concepts to understand how the US Federal Emergency Management Agency organized its response in the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy. Our conceptual framework can be used both by disaster scholars and policymakers to understand how networked power is constructed and utilized.
