Deze literatuurstudie, geschreven als onderdeel van een vijftal studies naar verschillende fasen in het EU-beleidsproces, behandelt de fase van beleidsvorming door de Europese Commissie (EC). Hierin staat de vraag centraal wat de belangrijkste voorwaarden zijn voor effectieve beïnvloeding in deze fase van het EU-beleidsproces door EU-lidstaten en in het bijzonder door Nederland. In de literatuurstudie is met name literatuur tussen 2016 en 2023 behandeld, die op één of andere wijze kan bijdragen aan inzicht in de manier waarop actoren, en in het bijzonder lidstaten, invloed kunnen uitoefenen op beleidsvorming door de EC. De belangrijkste inzichten die volgen uit de literatuurstudie zijn: • Dat het effectief kan zijn om vroegtijdig een breed scala aan beleidsmakers en andere actoren, zowel nationaal als op EU-niveau, te betrekken bij een gestructureerde en gecoördineerde inzet om beleidsformulering te beïnvloeden. Hierbij zouden dan zo veel mogelijk EU-niveau actoren, zoals koepelorganisaties en implementatie-organisaties betrokken moeten worden. • Dat het een positief effect kan hebben op effectiviteit om zo veel mogelijk samen te werken als regering en oppositie in een eensluidend standpunt naar het EU-niveau, en ook samen te werken met regeringen en parlementen in andere lidstaten. • Dat voldoende menskracht, met name wat betreft coördinatie van inzet en contacten met zowel EC als Europees Parlement (EP), kan bijdragen aan een effectievere beleidsbeïnvloeding. Daarbij helpt het als nauw contact met vertegenwoordigers in expertgroepen wordt gehouden en zwaarder gekwalificeerde personen afgevaardigd worden, zodat zij in de groepshiërarchie binnen expertgroepen een leidende rol kunnen spelen. • Dat het effectief kan zijn om bij het bepalen van de boodschap en beïnvloedingsstrategie, in deze vroegtijdige fase, rekening te houden met de motivaties en belangen van (individuele ambtenaren binnen) de EC en andere lidstaten, en er een EU-wijd belang wordt gepresenteerd. • Dat strategisch nadenken over het proces en de keuzes rond consultatie-instrumenten effectiviteit zou kunnen vergroten Over veel thema’s kon geen uitsluitend wetenschappelijk onderbouwd antwoord gegeven worden vanuit de bestaande literatuur op dit moment, en is aanvullend onderzoek nodig om geïnformeerde uitspraken te kunnen doen over de rol van lidstaten en van Nederland in het bijzonder.
MULTIFILE
For many EU citizens, working across the border is the only way to make a living in the EU. The battle for cheap labour has now become a well-oiled machine, in which almost all Western European countries participate. Nevertheless, the employment situation of EU Mobile Citizens, workers of low-skilled and -paid jobs, is often substandard. Challenges are housing, health care and working conditions. In addition, due to the lack of registration in municipalities, it is impossible to have an overview of the numbers and to offer effective help. This is a problem in small to medium-sized cities, where many workers live to work in agriculture, transport, construction, meat industry and logistics. For this study, 32 interviews were conducted in eleven small to medium-sized towns (SMSTs) in Sweden, Germany, the Netherlands, Ireland, Poland, and Spain. The study uses three different perspectives: EU representatives of participating regions, municipalities, and employers. The outcomes show that most SMSTs deal with a shortage of housing, and a lack of grip on the registration process of EU citizens. Although there are some success stories, most SMSTs are not in touch with each other to share these. The paper concludes with proposals for further action-research and collaborations to impact local policies.
DOCUMENT
In a study commissioned by the Association of Dutch Municipalities (VNG), the applied research group European Impact has compiled the results from interviews executed by approximately 240 European Studies students at The Hague University of Applied Sciences. The purpose of this report is to compare and contrast the situation of intra-EU labor migrants (hereafter referred to as EU mobile citizens) in regard to registration, housing, and information flows in 12 different municipalities across the EU. Based on semi-structured interviews with municipal workers and individuals from employment agencies/companies from the selected municipalities, the picture that emerges is one of divergence. There are significant variations regarding the registration procedure and information flows for EU mobile citizens across the selected municipalities. For registration, differences include where the registration takes place, the amount of collaboration between municipalities and employment agencies/companies on registering EU mobile citizens, and the importance of addresses in the registration process. Regarding information flows across the selected municipalities, there are significant variations in the amount and type of information available to EU mobile citizens, the number of languages information is available in,as well as how the information is organized (i.e. in a centralized or decentralized way). Furthermore, while all the member states in which the selected municipalities are located provide information regarding registration on the Single Digital Gateway, not all provide information about renting housing. As for housing, the results revealed that most of the selected municipalities face issues with housing and that EU mobile citizens typically find housing either via their employers or personal network. Based on the results, a list of potential best practices and policy areas that could be improved was compiled. Furthermore, in order to have a stronger overview of policy developments in the field of EU mobile citizens among different municipalities, the VNG could consider hosting a Community of Practice with different municipalities across the EU as well as monitoring Interreg Europe projects focused on improving the situation of EU mobile citizens.
DOCUMENT
MUSE supports the CIVITAS Community to increase its impact on urban mobility policy making and advance it to a higher level of knowledge, exchange, and sustainability.As the current Coordination and Support Action for the CIVITAS Initiative, MUSE primarily engages in support activities to boost the impact of CIVITAS Community activities on sustainable urban mobility policy. Its main objectives are to:- Act as a destination for knowledge developed by the CIVITAS Community over the past twenty years.- Expand and strengthen relationships between cities and stakeholders at all levels.- Support the enrichment of the wider urban mobility community by providing learning opportunities.Through these goals, the CIVITAS Initiative strives to support the mobility and transport goals of the European Commission, and in turn those in the European Green Deal.Breda University of Applied Sciences is the task leader of Task 7.3: Exploitation of the Mobility Educational Network and Task 7.4: Mobility Powered by Youth Facilitation.
The overall purpose of this consultancy was to support the activities under the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Programme of the UN Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) in developing the 7th pan-European environmental assessment, an indicator based and thematic assessment, implemented jointly with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and in support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The series of environmental assessments of the pan-European region provide up to-date and policy-relevant information on the interactions between the environment and society. This consultancy was to:> Draft the input on drivers and developments to chapter 1.2 of the assessment related to the environmental theme “4.2 Applying principles of circular economy to sustainable tourism”.> Suggest to UNECE and UNEP the most policy relevant indicators from UNECE-environmental, SDG indicators and from other indicator frameworks such as EEA or OECD for the environmental theme for the sub-chapter 4.2.> Assess the current state, trends and recent developments and prepare the substantive part of sub-chapter 4.2 (summary - part I) and an annex (part II) with the detailed analysis and findings.
The HAS professorship Future Food Systems is performing applied research with students and external partners to transform our food system towards a more sustainable state. In this research it is not only a question of what is needed to achieve this, but also how and with whom. The governance of our food system needs rethinking to get the transformative momentum going in a democratic and constructive manner. Building on the professorship’s research agenda and involvement in the transdisciplinary NWA research project, the postdoc will explore collective ownership and inclusive participation as two key governance concepts for food system transformation. This will be done in a participatory manner, by learning from and with innovative bottom-up initiatives and practitioners from the field. By doing so, the postdoc will gain valuable practical insights that can aid to new approaches and (policy) interventions which foster a sustainable and just food system in the Netherlands and beyond. A strong connection between research and education is created via the active research involvement of students from different study programs, supervised by the postdoc (Dr. B. van Helvoirt). The acquired knowledge is embedded in education by the postdoc by incorporating it into HAS study program curricula and courses. In addition, it will contribute to the further professional development of qualitative research skills among HAS students and staff. Through scientific, policy and popular publications, participation in (inter)national conferences and meetings with experts and practitioners, the exposure and network of the postdoc and HAS in the field of food systems and governance will be expanded. This will allow for the setting up of a continuous research effort on this topic within the professorship via follow-up research with knowledge institutes, civic society groups and partners from the professional field.
