We need educators to be constantly updating their skills and knowledge, and evidenced-informed practice is central to this; yet it is far from universal in our schools. Kristin Vanlommel and Chris Brown draw on their international research to show how EIP can be achieved based on three core principles. With this article, we consider the engagement by teachers and school leaders in educational practices that are ‘evidence-informed’ - across school systems and world-wide. There is a growing consensus that effective teaching and leadership is based on evidence-informed practice (or EIP), and that EIP results in improving student learning and achievement.
LINK
Digital innovation in education – as in any other sector – is not only about developing and implementing novel ideas, but also about having these ideas effectively used as well as widely accepted and adopted, so that many students can benefit from innovations improving education. Effectiveness, transferability and scalability cannot be added afterwards; it must be integrated from the start in the design, development and implementation processes, as is proposed in the movement towards evidence-informed practice (EIP). The impact an educational innovation has on the values of various stakeholders is often overlooked. Value Sensitive Design (VSD) is an approach to integrate values in technological design. In this paper we discuss how EIP and VSD may be combined into an integrated approach to digital innovation in education, which we call value-informed innovation. This approach not only considers educational effectiveness, but also incorporates the innovation’s impact on human values, its scalability and transferability to other contexts. We illustrate the integrated approach with an example case of an educational innovation involving digital peer feedback.
DOCUMENT
Evidence-informed change (EIC) has gained attention recently because it is seen as a lever to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of educational change. Important questions are: how is EIC conceptualized, what counts as evidence, and what factors can support EIC in practice? Because of the complexity of EIC, we aimed to understand these factors from a systems perspective. Different parts of the educational system (e.g. policy, practice of teachers’ and school leaders, research) are interrelated and need to be aligned for effective and sustainable change. Based on our scoping review we propose a model that conceptualizes EIC, identifies and defines different sources of evidence, and discusses influencing factors describing a system's readiness and capacity for EIC. Our results are an important step forward in understanding and supporting EIC in practice and developing targeted policy. This article also defines a common ground for future research, bringing together insights in an integrated framework of evidence-informed change.
LINK
De Faculteit Onderwijs en Opvoeding van Hogeschool van Amsterdam ontwikkelde, vanuit de wens tot harmonisatie van het curriculum en het bieden van flexibele leerpaden, twee gezamenlijke eerstejaarsmodules voor studenten van de pabo, tweedegraads lerarenopleidingen en pedagogiek. Hoewel deze brede opzet kansen biedt voor efficiëntere organisatie en voorbereiding op interprofessionele samenwerking, kan een brede module ook mogelijke negatieve impact op hebben op de binding van studenten met hun opleiding. Op basis van literatuur over binding (school engagement) werden interventies ontworpen gericht op drie componenten: participatie, identificatie en sociale verbondenheid. Denk aan het actief stimuleren en monitoren van aanwezigheid, het inzetten van samenwerkend leren in een blended design, en het toepassen van een social belonging-interventie. De toepassing van deze evidence-informed principes werd geëvalueerd met behulp van participatiedata en studentfeedback. Zowel fysieke als online participatie bleken voorspellend voor succes, hoewel blended inzet nog niet aantoonbaar tot extra rendement leidde. Studenten gaven aan een goede sfeer en samenwerking in de klas te ervaren. De aanpak lijkt daarmee voorzichtig passend te zijn voor de toegepaste context. De beschreven interventies bieden mogelijk ook aanknopingspunten voor andere instellingen die in brede of gedeelde curricula binding willen bevorderen.
DOCUMENT
Educational Technology (EdTech) refers to digital tools designed to advance education by enhancing teaching and learning experiences and streamlining administrative tasks. These tools play an increasingly central role in education, transforming how students learn, teachers instruct, and institutions manage resources. An EdTech ecosystem includes various stakeholders such as students, educators, institutions, EdTech providers, investors, policymakers, and researchers3. Each stakeholder plays a crucial role: students and teachers utilise the technology, institutions drive adoption, EdTech providers and investors foster innovation, policymakers establish regulations, and researchers analyse the need, design, and effectiveness of tools to shape future developments. The Dutch 3E Framework offers an evidence-informed approach to evaluate the effectiveness of EdTech. A key feature of the framework is its emphasis on continuous evaluation rather than static, one-time validation, ensuring EdTech tools are improved over time. The framework is a step towards more effective technology integration in education by making evidence-informed decision-making (in the context of development, procurement and enhancement of EdTech) an accessible and actionable process. The primary aim of the Dutch 3E Framework is not to mandate evaluation for all tools but to promote a culture where evidence-informed decision-making is embedded in all EdTech-related processes. This framework serves as a practical guide on how evidence is generated, interpreted, and used to develop, procure, and improve EdTech effectively. The framework is expected to facilitate meaningful discussions within the Dutch education community about evidence-informed evaluation of EdTech and help navigate the complexities of technology integration in education. This framework was designed for Npuls
DOCUMENT
Hoe kan het onderwijs worden vormgegeven zodat mbo-jongeren worden gestimuleerd om te gaan stemmen? In dit onderzoek laten we de resultaten zien van een exploratieve evaluatie van drie sets met evidence-informed leermiddelen met als doel de stemintentie van jongeren te verhogen. De leermiddelen richten zich op (1) informatie over het stemproces, (2) in gesprek gaan over wel of niet stemmen en (3) gesprekken over maatschappelijke onderwerpen in combinatie met het invullen van een stemadviesapplicatie. De leermiddelen zijn gegeven door negen docenten en geëvalueerd door middel van docentinterviews en studentvragenlijsten (N = 172). Uit de resultaten kan worden opgemaakt dat docenten en studenten positief zijn over de praktische benadering in de leermiddelen. Tevens blijkt uit de resultaten dat de leermiddelen studenten inzicht geven in hun politieke voorkeur en dat zij leren het gesprek over stemmen met elkaar aan te gaan. Dit stimuleert mogelijk politiek zelfvertrouwen. Deze resultaten scheppen positieve verwachtingen voor de mogelijke effectiviteit van de lessen die kan worden getoetst in vervolgonderzoek.--How can education be designed to encourage students in vocational education to vote? We present the results of an explorative evaluation of three evidence-informed lessons aimed at increasing young people’s intention to vote. The three lessons focus on (1) information about the voting process, (2) engaging in discussions about whether or not to vote, and (3) discussions about socio-political issues combined with the use of a voting advice application. The lessons were taught by nine teachers and evaluated through teacher interviews and student questionnaires (N = 172). The results indicate that both teachers and students responded positively to the practical approach of the teaching materials. Additionally, the materials provided students with insight into their political preferences and helped them engage in discussions about voting. This potentially fosters political self-efficacy. These findings create positive expectations regarding the lessons’ potential effectiveness, which can be examined in follow-up research.
DOCUMENT
Innovation is crucial for higher education to ensure high-quality curricula that address the changing needs of students, labor markets, and society as a whole. Substantial amounts of resources and enthusiasm are devoted to innovations, but often they do not yield the desired changes. This may be due to unworkable goals, too much complexity, and a lack of resources to institutionalize the innovation. In many cases, innovations end up being less sustainable than expected or hoped for. In the long term, the disappointing revenues of innovations hamper the ability of higher education to remain future proof. Against the background of this need to increase the success of educational innovations, our colleague Klaartje van Genugten has explored the literature on innovations to reveal mechanisms that contribute to the sustainability of innovations. Her findings are synthesized in this report. They are particularly meaningful for directors of education programs, curriculum committees, educational consultants, and policy makers, who are generally in charge of defining the scope and set up of innovations. Her report offers a comprehensive view and provides food for thought on how we can strive for future-proof and sustainable innovations. I therefore recommend reading this report.
DOCUMENT
Financially vulnerable consumers are often associated with suboptimal financial behaviors. Evaluated financial education programs so far show difficulties to effectively reach this target population. In our attempt to solve this problem, we built a behaviorally informed financial education program incorporating insights from both motivational and behavioral change theories. In a quasi-experimental field study among Dutch financially vulnerable people, we compared this program with both a control group and a traditional program group. In comparison with the control group, we found robust positive effects of the behaviorally informed program on financial skills and knowledge and self-reported financial behavior, but not on other outcomes. Additionally, we did not find evidence that the behaviorally informed program performed better than the traditional program. Finally, we discuss the findings and limitations of this study in light of the financial education literature and provide implications for policymaking and directions for future research.
MULTIFILE
De leidraad ondersteunt mbo-instellingen om zich tot lerende organisaties te ontwikkelen. In een mbo-school als lerende organisatie verbeteren docenten, opleidingsteams en schoolleiders hun onderwijs op een onderbouwde en duurzame manier. Door zich te verdiepen in bestaande kennis, ervaringen te delen, van elkaar te leren en samen te werken. Het doel van deze leidraad is om docenten, opleidingsteams en schoolleiders kennis en handvatten te bieden om zich tot een lerende organisatie te ontwikkelen. We verbinden kennis uit onderzoek aan kennis en ervaringen van docenten. Ook bieden we handvatten om de manier van duurzaam werken aan kwaliteitsverbetering te kunnen verankeren in de cultuur van de mbo-instelling. Aan de hand van de zes aanbevelingen in deze leidraad, werk je toe naar een lerende organisatie. In aanbeveling 1 en 2 focus je op het onderzoeksmatig en cyclisch werken aan onderwijsverbetering en in aanbeveling 3 t/m 6 werk je aan het creëren van een onderzoekscultuur: Kom tot een onderbouwd en gedragen verbeterplan Zorg voor een proces van uitvoeren, monitoren, bijstellen en borgen Stimuleer een onderzoekende houding Stimuleer samen leren in het team Benut kennis en expertise Creëer een schoolklimaat waarin leiderschap wordt gespreid
MULTIFILE
