Objective: To describe the development of a goal-directed movement intervention in two medical wards, including recommendations for implementation and evaluation. Design: Implementation Research. Setting: Pulmonology and nephrology/gastroenterology wards of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands. Participants: Seven focus groups were executed including 28 nurses, 7 physical therapists and 15 medical specialists. Patients' perceptions were repeatedly assessed during the iterative steps of the intervention development. Intervention: Interventions were targeted to each ward's specific character, following an Intervention Mapping approach using literature and research meetings. Main measures: Intervention components were linked to Behavior Change Techniques and implementation strategies will be selected using the Expert Recommendation Implementing Change tool. Evaluation outcomes like number of patients using the movement intervention will be measured, based on the taxonomy of Proctor. Results: The developed intervention consists of: insight in patients movement behavior (monitoring & feedback), goal setting (goals & planning) and adjustments to the environment (associations & antecedents). The following implementation strategies are recommended: to conduct educational meetings, prepare & identify champions and audit & provide feedback. To measure service and client outcomes, the mean level of physical activity per ward can be evaluated and the Net Promoter Score can be used. Conclusion(s): This study shows the development of a goal-directed movement intervention aligned with the needs of healthcare professionals. This resulted in an intervention consisting of feedback & monitoring of movement behavior, goal setting and adjustments in the environment. Using a step-by-step iterative implementation model to guide development and implementation is recommended.
DOCUMENT
Inleiding: Bij mensen met verstandelijke beperkingen (VB) is obstipatie een van de meest voorkomende gezondheidsproblemen en de gevolgen kunnen groot zijn. Dit onderzoek beoogt een overzicht te geven van de prevalentie van, risicofactoren voor en (niet-)medicamenteuze behandeling van obstipatie bij mensen met VB. Daarnaast wordt de relatie tussen obstipatie, dysfagie en medicatie geanalyseerd.Methode: Het onderzoek bestond uit literatuur- en dossieronderzoek. Voor het systematische literatuuronderzoek werden de databases PubMed en Scopus doorzocht. Het dwarsdoorsnede (cross-sectionele) dossieronderzoek werd uitgevoerd bij zorginstelling Alliade. Data over aanwezigheid van obstipatie, laxantiagebruik, inzet van niet-medicamenteuze behandelingen en risicofactoren, waaronder dysfagie en medicatiegebruik, werden verzameld.Resultaten: De literatuur toonde sterk variërende obstipatie-prevalenties van 6 tot 94%. Het dossieronderzoek liet zien dat 24,3% van de cliënten een obstipatiediagnose heeft en 55% chronisch laxantia gebruikt. Risicofactoren voor obstipatie werden in de literatuur weinig gevonden. Risicofactoren gevonden in de dossiers waren mate VB, dysfagie en medicatie. Niet-medicamenteuze behandelingen voor obstipatie werden zelden gerapporteerd en betroffen fysiotherapeutische behandelingen, buikmassage en voedingssupplementen. Conclusie: De prevalentie van obstipatie en chronisch laxantiagebruik bleek hoog. Er is nog veel onduidelijk over risicofactoren en over de inzet van alternatieve behandelmethoden naast laxantia. Gezien de grote impact die obstipatie kan hebben op mensen met VB is verder onderzoek naar deze aandoening en de behandelmethoden wenselijk.
LINK
Background: Undernutrition is a common complication of disease and a major determinant of hospital stay outcome. Dutch hospitals are required to screen for undernutrition on the first day of admission. Objective: We sought to determine the prevalence of the screening score “undernourished” with the use of the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ) or Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and its relation to length of hospital stay (LOS) in the general hospital population and per medical specialty. Design: We conducted an observational cross-sectional study at 2 university, 3 teaching, and 8 general hospitals. All adult inpatients aged ≥18 y with an LOS of at least 1 d were included. Between 2007 and 2014, the SNAQ/MUST score, admitting medical specialty, LOS, age, and sex of each patient were extracted from the digital hospital chart system. Linear regression analysis with ln(LOS) as an outcome measure and SNAQ ≥3 points/MUST ≥2 points, sex, and age as determinant variables was used to test the relation between SNAQ/MUST score and LOS. Results: In total, 564,063 patients were included (48% males and 52% females aged 62 ± 18 y). Of those, 74% (419,086) were screened with SNAQ and 26% (144,977) with MUST, and 13.7% (SNAQ) and 14.9% (MUST) of the patients were defined as being undernourished. Medical specialties with the highest percentage of the screening score of undernourished were geriatrics (38%), oncology (33%), gastroenterology (27%), and internal medicine (27%). Patients who had an undernourished screening score had a higher LOS than did patients who did not (median 6.8 compared with 4.0 d; P < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that a positive SNAQ/MUST score was significantly associated with LOS [SNAQ: +1.43 d (95% CI: 1.42, 1.44 d), P < 0.001; MUST: +1.47 d (95% CI: 1.45, 1.49 d), P < 0.001]. Conclusions: This study provides benchmark data on the prevalence of undernutrition, including more than half a million patients. One out of 7 patients was scored as undernourished. For geriatrics, oncology, gastroenterology, and internal medicine, this ratio was even greater (1 out of 3–4). Hospital stay was 1.4 d longer among undernourished patients than among those who were well nourished.
LINK
