Deze infosheet is tot stand gekomen op basis van literatuuronderzoek en gemaakt ter ondersteuning van de inrichting van de Studentsucces Centra. We schetsen een theoretisch kader voor leren door peers, bespreken enkele inrichtingsvraagstukken en reiken randvoorwaarden voor succes aan.
DOCUMENT
From the article: "Whilst the importance of online peer feedback and writing argumentative essays for students in higher education is unquestionable, there is a need for further research into whether and the extent to which female and male students differ with regard to their argumentative feedback, essay writing, and content learning in online settings. The current study used a pre-test, post-test design to explore the extent to which female and male students differ regarding their argumentative feedback quality, essay writing and content learning in an online environment. Participants were 201 BSc biotechnology students who wrote an argumentative essay, engaged in argumentative peer feedback with learning partners in the form of triads and finally revised their original argumentative essay. The findings revealed differences between females and males in terms of the quality of their argumentative feedback. Female students provided higher-quality argumentative feedback than male students. Although all students improved their argumentative essay quality and also knowledge content from pre-test to post-test, these improvements were not significantly different between females and males. Explanations for these findings and recommendations are provided"
MULTIFILE
Peer-coaching omvat een helpende relatie waarin twee mensen van gelijke status actief deelnemen en daarbij leren van elkaar. Binnen het hoger onderwijs wordt peer-coaching steeds vaker toegepast, waarbij studenten hun peers kunnen helpen en ondersteunen. Begrijpelijk want peer-coaching heeft bewezen positieve effecten voor zowel de coach als coachee. Bij het Studentsucces centrum (SSC), dat sinds 2020 is opgericht om de binding en het welzijn van studenten te versterken, is het bieden van ondersteuning middels peer-coaching een kernactiviteit. Binnen elk SSC zijn een of meerdere getrainde studenten actief als studentbuddy’s. In deze studie is gekeken naar de opbrengsten van de peer-to-peer begeleiding. Daarbij viel direct op dat de coaching die de buddies op dit moment bij het SSC bieden veelal van korte duur en gericht op oppervlakkige en praktische vragen en er derhalve niet echt sprake is van een coachings-traject. Daarbij blijft het aantal coaching-aanvragen laag, terwijl er bewijs is dat studenten wel ondersteuning zouden willen en nodig hebben op studie-gerelateerd en emotioneel gebied. Wat kan er volgens de studenten gedaan worden om de peer-coaching te intensiveren? Door te ontdekken hoe de studentbuddy’s en peers de coaching en alles wat daarbij komt kijken hebben ervaren, zijn waardevolle lessen geleerd worden voor de promotie en ontwikkeling van peer-to-peer begeleiding. Daartoe is er op exploratieve wijze onderzocht wat de behoeften, ervaringen en opbrengsten zijn van zowel de studentbuddy’s als de gecoachte peers. Er is onder andere gekeken naar de bekendheid van het SSC, hoe betrokken de studenten zich voelen bij het SSC, hoe tevreden de studenten zijn met het SSC en wat de peer-coaching doet met de persoonlijke en professionele ontwikkeling en het studiesucces. In totaal zijn tien student-buddy’s en zes peers geïnterviewd. Onder de geïnterviewde buddy’s is er een grote verscheidenheid aan de hoeveelheid gecoachte peers, de duur van de coaching trajecten en de inhoud ervan. De bekendheid van het SSC en met name de peer-coaching mogelijkheden die aangeboden worden, zijn als belangrijkste verbeterpunt in het licht van het relatief lage aantal coaching aanvragen, genoemd. De buddy’s zijn zelf vaak per toeval bekend geworden met het SSC en waren vaak voor hun rol als studentbuddy er nog niet bekend mee. Wel geven de meeste studentbuddy’s aan zich zeer betrokken te voelen bij het team en de peers die ze coachen, zich persoonlijk te hebben ontwikkeld en tevreden te zijn met de werkzaamheden. De buddy’s voelen zich meer zelfverzekerd, zijn sterker geworden in hun sociale vaardigheden en voelen zich meer thuis op de hogeschool. De geïnterviewde peers ontvingen individuele coaching bij plannen, motivatie vinden, studieopdrachten en wegwijs worden op de hogeschool. Alle peers gaven aan dat de peer-coaching belangrijk is en het hen helpt. Dat studentbuddy’s meer tijd hebben, makkelijker benaderbaar zijn en informeler communiceren dan bijvoorbeeld docenten en decanen, werden als voordelen genoemd. Ook de peers gaven aan dat het SSC niet heel bekend is onder de studenten. Ze gaven aan vaak doorverwezen te zijn door een docent of studieloopbaanbegeleider, of per toeval in contact zijn gekomen met een studentbuddy. De peers voelen zich zeer betrokken bij de studentbuddy, maar niet bij het SSC en zijn meestal niet bekend met andere activiteiten die het SSC aanbiedt. Tot slot geven de peers aan dat de peer-coaching heeft geholpen bij hun studievaardigheden, stressvermindering en ook meer thuis voelen op de hogeschool. In de literatuur worden voordelen van peer-coaching op de academische prestaties, het zelfvertrouwen, de motivatie bevorderen, maar ook praktische en emotionele ondersteuning beschreven. Wie zien in deze studie bij onze SSC’s dat, hoe kleinschalig of kortdurend dan ook, de peer-to-peer aanpak inderdaad deze voordelen oplevert. Gezien de aard van sommige hulpvragen, is langdurige coaching niet altijd noodzakelijk. Tevens laat deze studie zien dat het ook voordelen voor de studentbuddy’s zelf, zoals meer betrokken worden op de hogeschool en verbeterde vaardigheden, oplevert. Ondanks de behoefte aan peer-coaching en promotieactiviteiten van het SSC, weten studenten de weg naar het SSC nog niet goed te vinden. Er lijken grote verschillen te zijn in de vorm en inhoud van de peer-coaching tussen studentbuddy’s. Een duidelijkere afbakening en routekaart van hulpbronnen binnen de hogeschool, zou het SSC meer draagvlak en bekendheid binnen de organisatie kunnen opleveren. De geïnterviewde studenten gaven daarnaast als tips om vaker langs de klassen te gaan, gadgets in te zetten, de vindbaarheid online te vergroten en in de fysieke locaties te verduidelijken bij wie de student terecht kan.
DOCUMENT
Supplemental instruction, also known as Peer Assisted Study Sessions (SI-PASS), is a well-established form of peer learning that has been implemented in higher education institutions across the globe and that coincides with learning gains for participants. While the effects on learning gains have been extensively studied with quasi-experiments, the underlying mechanisms that make SI-PASS effective are less well understood. This study explored what benefits students thought SI-PASS offered and through which mechanisms. We studied this by interviewing 14 students who participated in SI-PASS during a field experiment that reliably found a significant impact of SI-PASS on performance. The students were asked to expand on if and why they thought SI-PASS was effective. Thematic analysis and independent coding indicated an interplay of three main drivers. SI-PASS was experienced as effective because it stimulated the use of effective study techniques and social learning. These drivers were facilitated and enhanced by a pedagogical climate that lowered the threshold to engage in collaborative learning and effective study techniques. These findings could help pinpoint what elements should be highlighted during the preparation of SI-leaders and what aspects should be monitored and tested when implementing or studying SI-PASS.
DOCUMENT
The first year of study is very exciting for many students. Everything is new: the school, your schedule, the teachers, and your fellow students. How can a university ensure a smooth transition for first-year students? For this, Inholland launched the Students for Students (S4S) project in the 2019-2020 academic year. In this project, second-year students (studentcoaches) support first-year students with their studies. They do this based on their own experience and the training they receive during their year as studentcoaches. Research shows that peer-mentoring is very successful in aiding first-year students through their first year of the study program. Peer-mentoring has the potential to increase well-being, social bonding, the feeling of belonging, and student resilience. It also ensures smoother academic integration, as peer-mentoring focuses on developing academic skills as well. Additionally, a studentcoach is often a low threshold point of contact for students where they can go with questions.
DOCUMENT
Equine-Assisted Services (EAS) offer many benefits for people with intellectual or physical disabilities. As these services grow in popularity, ensuring the welfare of the horses involved is crucial. This study explored the horses’ mood state during equine-assisted coaching and therapeutic riding sessions, focusing on factors like session length, the horse’s personality, and care practices.Keywords: horse–human interaction; welfare; equine-assisted services; health and safety; affective states
DOCUMENT
To examine the association of adolescents' snack and soft drink consumption with friendship group snack and soft drink consumption, availability of snacks and soft drinks at school, and personal characteristics, snack and soft drink consumption was assessed in 749 adolescents (398 girls, 351 boys, age 12.4 - 17.6 years), and their friends, and snack and soft drink availability at schools was measured. In regression analysis, consumption by friends, snack and soft drink availability within school, and personal characteristics (age, gender, education level, body mass index) were examined as determinants of snack and drink consumption. Snack and soft drink consumption was higher in boys, soft drink consumption was higher in lower educated adolescents, and snack consumption was higher in adolescents with a lower body weight. Peer group snack and soft drink consumption were associated with individual intake, particularly when availability in the canteen and vending machines was high. The association between individual and peer snack consumption was strong in boys, adolescents with a lower education level, and adolescents with lower body weights. Our study shows that individual snack and soft drink consumption is associated with specific combinations of consumption by peers, availability at school, and personal characteristics.
DOCUMENT
This study provides an illustration of a research design complementary to randomized controlled trial to evaluate program effects, namely, participatory peer research (PPR). The PPR described in current study was carried out in a small sample (N = 10) of young adults with mild intellectual disabilities (MID) and severe behavioral problems. During the PPR intervention, control and feedback to individuals is restored by training them to become participant-researchers, who collaborate in a small group of people with MID. Their research is aimed at the problems the young adults perceive and/or specific subjects of their interest. The study was designed as a multiple case study with an experimental and comparison group. Questionnaires and a semistructured interview were administered before and after the PPR project. Results of Reliable Change Index (RCI) analyses showed a decrease in self-serving cognitive distortions in the PPR group, but not in the comparison group. These results indicate that PPR helps to compensate for a lack of adequate feedback and control, and in turn may decrease distorted thinking and thereby possibly later challenging behavior.
DOCUMENT
This chapter describes the use of a scoring rubric to encourage students to improve their information literacy skills. It will explain how the students apply the rubric to supply feedback on their peers’ performance in information problem solving (IPS) tasks. Supplying feedback appears to be a promising learning approach in acquiring knowledge about information literacy, not only for the assessed but also for the assessor. The peer assessment approach helps the feedback supplier to construct actively sustainable knowledge about the IPS process. This knowledge surpasses the construction of basic factual knowledge – level 1 of the ‘Revised taxonomy of learning objectives’ (Krathwohl, 2002) – and stimulates the understanding and application of the learning content as well as the more complex cognitive processes of analysis, evaluation and creation. This is the author version of a book published by Elsevier. Dit is de auteursversie van een hoofdstuk dat is gepubliceerd bij Elsevier.
DOCUMENT
The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences and impact of peer-to-peer shadowing as a technique to develop nurse middle managers’ clinical leadership practices. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted to gain insight into the experiences of nurse middle managers using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed into codes using constant comparison and similar codes were grouped under sub-themes and then into four broader themes. Peer-to-peer shadowing facilitates collective reflection-in-action and enhances an “investigate stance” while acting. Nurse middle managers begin to curb the caring disposition that unreflectively urges them to act, to answer the call for help in the here and now, focus on ad hoc “doings”, and make quick judgements. Seeing a shadowee act produces, via a process of social comparison, a behavioural repertoire of postponing reactions and refraining from judging. Balancing the act of stepping in and doing something or just observing as well as giving or withholding feedback are important practices that are difficult to develop.
DOCUMENT
