Currently, various higher education (HE) institutes develop flexible curricula for various reasons, including promoting accessibility of HE, the societal need for more self-regulated professionals who engage in life-long learning, and the desire to increase motivation of students. Increasing flexibility in curricula allows students to choose for example what they learn, when they learn, how they learn, where they learn, and/or with whom. However, HE institutes raise the question of what preferences and needs different stakeholders have with regard to flexibility, so that suitable choices can be made in the design of policies, curricula, and student support programs. In this workshop, we focus on student preferences and share recent insights from research on HE students' preferences regarding flexible education. Moreover, we use participants’ expertise to identify new (research) questions to further explore what students’ needs imply for several domains, namely curriculum-design, student support that is provided by educators/staff, policy, management, and the professional field. Firstly, a conceptual framework on flexible education and student’s preferences will be presented. Secondly, participants reflect in groups on student personas. Then, discussion groups have a Delphi-based discussion to collect new ideas for research. Finally, participants share the outcomes on a ‘willing wall’ and a ‘wailing wall’.
MULTIFILE
In this document, we provide the methodological background for the Safety atWork project. This document combines several project deliverables as defined inthe overall project plan: validation techniques and methods (D5.1.1), performanceindicators for safety at work (D5.1.2), personal protection equipment methods(D2.1.2), situational awareness methods (D3.1.2), and persuasive technology methods(D4.1.2).
MULTIFILE
Integrating professional research into higher education is supposed to intellectually benefit students. However, the literature suggests that students in different academic disciplines experience differing research opportunities. Previous studies have shown how junior students of natural sciences have less opportunity to engage in research than students in ‘soft’ disciplines. To investigate research involvement, undergraduate students (N = 2192) of all seven faculties of a university filled out a survey that included the Research Experience Scale. This scale provides four types of potential research involvement comprised of passive involvement and three types of active research involvement. The categorisation of disciplines was based on the framework constructed by Anthony Biglan, with its distinction between hard/soft and life/nonlife criteria. All disciplines included in this study were applied, thereby excluding Biglan’s pure/applied distinction. A betweengroup analysis showed that each of the types of research involvement yielded a different pattern for students from different study years. The ‘students-as-researcher’ type in particular showed that students of lower study years in the life disciplines were systematically less involved than more senior students. These findings highlight the importance of more precise definitions of research involvement, as well as clearer distinctions between disciplinary differences in research and curriculum design.
Students in Higher Music Education (HME) are not facilitated to develop both their artistic and academic musical competences. Conservatoires (professional education, or ‘HBO’) traditionally foster the development of musical craftsmanship, while university musicology departments (academic education, or ‘WO’) promote broader perspectives on music’s place in society. All the while, music professionals are increasingly required to combine musical and scholarly knowledge. Indeed, musicianship is more than performance, and musicology more than reflection—a robust musical practice requires people who are versed in both domains. It’s time our education mirrors this blended profession. This proposal entails collaborative projects between a conservatory and a university in two cities where musical performance and musicology equally thrive: Amsterdam (Conservatory and University of Amsterdam) and Utrecht (HKU Utrechts Conservatorium and Utrecht University). Each project will pilot a joint program of study, combining existing modules with newly developed ones. The feasibility of joint degrees will be explored: a combined bachelor’s degree in Amsterdam; and a combined master’s degree in Utrecht. The full innovation process will be translated to a transferable infrastructural model. For 125 students it will fuse praxis-based musical knowledge and skills, practice-led research and academic training. Beyond this, the partners will also use the Comenius funds as a springboard for collaboration between the two cities to enrich their respective BA and MA programs. In the end, the programme will diversify the educational possibilities for students of music in the Netherlands, and thereby increase their professional opportunities in today’s job market.
Teachers have a crucial role in bringing about the extensive social changes that are needed in the building of a sustainable future. In the EduSTA project, we focus on sustainability competences of teachers. We strengthen the European dimension of teacher education via Digital Open Badges as means of performing, acknowledging, documenting, and transferring the competencies as micro-credentials. EduSTA starts by mapping the contextual possibilities and restrictions for transformative learning on sustainability and by operationalising skills. The development of competence-based learning modules and open digital badge-driven pathways will proceed hand in hand and will be realised as learning modules in the partnering Higher Education Institutes and badge applications open for all teachers in Europe.Societal Issue: Teachers’ capabilities to act as active facilitators of change in the ecological transition and to educate citizens and workforce to meet the future challenges is key to a profound transformation in the green transition.Teachers’ sustainability competences have been researched widely, but a gap remains between research and the teachers’ practise. There is a need to operationalise sustainability competences: to describe direct links with everyday tasks, such as curriculum development, pedagogical design, and assessment. This need calls for an urgent operationalisation of educators’ sustainability competences – to support the goals with sustainability actions and to transfer this understanding to their students.Benefit to society: EduSTA builds a community, “Academy of Educators for Sustainable Future”, and creates open digital badge-driven learning pathways for teachers’ sustainability competences supported by multimodal learning modules. The aim is to achieve close cooperation with training schools to actively engage in-service teachers.Our consortium is a catalyst for leading and empowering profound change in the present and for the future to educate teachers ready to meet the challenges and act as active change agents for sustainable future. Emphasizing teachers’ essential role as a part of the green transition also adds to the attractiveness of teachers’ work.
Om tegemoet te komen aan de eisen die gesteld worden aan werknemers in de huidig snel veranderende samenleving heeft de NHL Stenden Hogeschool gekozen voor een nieuw onderwijsconcept, namelijk Design Based Education (DBE). DBE is gebaseerd op het gedachtegoed van Design Thinking en stimuleert iteratieve en creatieve denkprocessen. DBE is een student-georiënteerde leeromgeving, gebaseerd op praktijk-, dialoog-, en vraaggestuurde onderwijsprincipes en op zelfsturend, constructief, contextueel en samenwerkend leren. Studenten construeren gezamenlijk kennis en ontwikkelen een prototype voor een praktijkvraagstuk. Student-georiënteerde leeromgevingen vragen andere begeleidingsstrategieën van docenten dan zij gewend zijn. Van docenten wordt verwacht dat zij studenten activeren gezamenlijk kennis te construeren en dat zij nauw samenwerken met werkveldprofessionals. Eerder onderzoek toont aan dat docenten, zelfs in een student-georiënteerde leeromgeving, geneigd zijn terug te vallen op conventionele strategieën. De overstap naar een ander onderwijsconcept gaat dus blijkbaar niet vanzelf. Collectief leren stimuleert docenten de dialoog aan te gaan met andere docenten en werkveldprofessionals met als doel gezamenlijk te experimenteren en collectief te handelen. De centrale vraag van het postdoc-onderzoek is het ontwerpen en ontwikkelen van (karakteristieken van) interventies die collectief leren van docenten en werkveldprofessionals stimuleren. Het doel van het postdoconderzoek is om de overstap naar DBE zo probleemloos mogelijk te laten verlopen door docenten te ondersteunen DBE leeromgevingen te ontwikkelen in samenwerking met werkveldprofessionals en DBE te integreren in hun docentactiviteiten. De onderzoeksmethode is Educational Design Research en bestaat uit vier fasen: preliminair onderzoek, ontwikkelen van prototypes, evaluatie en bijdrage aan de praktijk. Het onderzoek is verbonden aan het lectoraat Sustainable Educational Concepts in Higher Education en wordt hiërarchisch en inhoudelijk aangestuurd door de lector. Docenten, experts, werkveldprofessionals en studenten worden betrokken bij het onderzoek. Dit onderzoek kan zowel binnen als buiten de hogeschool een bijdrage leveren omdat steeds meer hogescholen kiezen voor een ander onderwijsconcept.
