Co-creation in a quintuple helix, the art of including natural environments of society in a living lab that includes different types of stakeholders and monitoring the quality of this process of co-creation.In the last decade, co-creation has not only become a widely used concept in academic discourses but also in public policies that aim to tackle so called 'wicked problems', a term coined in the 1970s (Rittel & Webber, 1973) that is nowadays often interchangeably used with societal challenges or SDGs.This focus on tackling societal challenges by governments in collaboration with citizens opened the door for new concepts such as ‘living labs’ in 2006 (Rădulescu et al., 2022) ‘policy labs’, ‘innovation hubs’, ‘co-creation labs’ and recently ‘public sector innovation (PSI) labs’ (Fuglsang & Hansen, 2022; Hansen & Fuglsang, 2020; McGann et al., 2021; Torvinen & Jansson, 2022). The use of labs has also been addressed by the OECD in their publication on innovation in the public sector outlook to make policymakers aware of the importance of public sector innovation (OECD, 2015).Literature research in combination with questionnaires into these types of labs showed that the definitions of PSI labs are quite ‘fuzzy’, sometimes even interchangeable and are heavily dependent on the national, regional and local context as well (McGann et al., 2018). In addition, research also showed that it is difficult to distinguish good practices, let alone to define specific conditions for these good practices (Meister Broekema et al., 2022).In addition, an inductive analysis of a large number of EU policies shows that on a conceptual level, the EU uses specific interpretations of social innovation (Moulaert & MacCallum 2019) and co-creation in open innovation (‘Open Innovation 2.0’ 2013), influenced by the concept of triple- and quadruple helix innovation in which universities, governments and enterprises are collaborating, sometimes for the benefit of society as a whole (Carayannis & Campbell 2012; Leydesdorff 2010). Co-creation as such is used merely as a criterion within social innovation projects that aim to tackle societal challenges, therefore neglecting the quality of the process of co-creation (Meister Broekema et al. 2021).In order to maximise the impact of co-creation and be able to tackle societal challenges such as climate change, it is therefore essential to focus more on the quality of co-creation between 4 helixes in these processes and include the environment as a fifth helix (quintuple helix innovation as defined by Carayannis et. al. 2012). In the talk, a novel framework will be presented that will support collaborators in a project that aims to tackle a societal challenge by including the right stakeholders at the right time and monitor progress and satisfaction continuously (Meister Broekema 2023) in a quintuple helix setting.This presentation will contribute mostly to SDG 17 (partnership for the goals) and SDG4 (Quality Education) and is best suited for SDG13 (Climate Action).The insights can be used to enable multiple stakeholders from government, education and research, enterprises and citizens within a natural environment (mountains & oceans) to co-create in a quintuple helix setting, maximising their impact on climate change and strengthening partnerships for this goal.
Wie aan de slag wil als sociaal ondernemer of meer wil weten over sociaal ondernemerschap, vindt in Sociaal ondernemerschap: impact eerst een uitgebreide gids vol inzichten en praktische adviezen. Het boek bestaat uit drie delen. Het eerste deel, ‘Impact eerst’, laat zien hoe sociaal ondernemerschap past binnen nieuw economisch denken en hoe het zich verhoudt tot andere concepten, zoals maatschappelijk verantwoord of duurzaam ondernemen. Heldere voorbeelden en gedetailleerde analyses tonen hoe sociale ondernemingen maatschappelijke problemen aanpakken. Tevens gaat het in op het begrip impact: wat betekent dit nu precies en hoe kun je impact creëren en meten?Het tweede deel, ‘Sociaal ondernemen in de praktijk’, biedt praktische richtlijnen voor het starten en organiseren van een sociale onderneming. Het bespreekt kenmerken en vaardigheden van sociaal ondernemers, het opzetten en organiseren van een sociale onderneming en het functioneren van het ecosysteem rond sociaal ondernemerschap.In het derde deel, ‘De toekomst van sociaal ondernemerschap’, staan tien kansen voor de toekomst centraal. Hierin geeft de auteur aan hoe je als sociaal ondernemer kunt bijdragen aan beter onderwijs, sociale inclusie en duurzaamheid. Het boek wordt gecompleteerd met een lijst met tips voor verder lezen, kijken en luisteren.Sociaal ondernemerschap: impact eerst is een waardevolle bron voor ondernemers, beleidsmakers, studenten en iedereen die geïnteresseerd is in ondernemen met een maatschappelijke missie. Het boek presenteert de inzichten en tools om positieve verandering te realiseren door middel van sociaal ondernemerschap.
MULTIFILE
Over the past decade, more and more studies have been published about OER adoptionby educators and educational institutions. The largest part of these studies is about OER in Higher Education and a growing amount is about OER and open textbooks in K-12 education. In addition, according to De Olivereira Netoet al (2017), most studies are focused on the Global North where education instructors “enjoy comparatively higher levels of economic development, educational provision, policy elaboration, and technological access than those in the Global South. This means that less is known about educators’ OER-related practices in the regionwhere OER is touted as having its potentially greatest impact”(De Olivereira Netoet al,2017:2-3).Despite the steadily growing number of studies on the use of OER by educators, there is part of the realm of education that still is ‘a dark continent’ for OER and OER studies, namely Technical Vocational Education and Training (TVET). As an indicator, we have analyzed the database from the OER Knowledgecloud1, considered representative for the current state of international OER research, being available as Open Access. With a total of 1638 items in the database (27 October, 9:35 CEST), searching on “technical AND vocational” only gave 2 results (dating from 2011 and 2012).The research presented in this paperprovides the results of a systematic international literature review with the aim of localizing relevant studies on the potentialities and use of OER in TVET. The information from this literature review has been complemented by data from an international quantitative survey taken by members of an UNESCO TVET forum, and from semi-structured interviews with international TVET experts.
LINK
