Background: Collaboration between Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs) and parents is considered best practice for children with developmental disorders. However, such collaborative approach is not yet implemented in therapy for children with developmental language disorders (DLD) in the Netherlands. Improving Dutch SLTs’ collaboration with parents requires insight in factors that influence the way SLTs work with parents. Aims: To explore the specific beliefs of Dutch SLTs that influence how they collaborate with parents of children with DLD. Methods and procedures: We conducted three online focus groups with 17 SLTs using a reflection tool and fictional examples of parents to prompt their thoughts, feelings and actions on specific scenarios. Data were organised using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Outcomes and results: We identified 34 specific beliefs across nine TDF domains on how SLTs collaborate with parents of children with DLD. The results indicate that SLTs hold beliefs on how to support SLTs in collaborating with parents but also conflicting specific beliefs regarding collaborative work with parents. The latter relate to SLTs’ perspectives on their professional role and identity, their approach towards parents, and their confidence and competence in working collaboratively with parents.
DOCUMENT
Background Children with speech sound disorders (SSD) are at higher risk of communication breakdown, but the impact of having an SSD may vary from child to child. Determining the severity of SSD helps speech-language therapists (SLTs) to recognise the extent of the problem and to identify and prioritise children who require intervention. Aims This study aimed to identify severity factors for SSD in order to develop a multifactorial Speech Sound Disorder Severity Construct (SSDSC) using SLTs’ views and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Method In an explorative five-staged qualitative study, the research question was answered: ‘How do SLTs determine the severity of SSD in children?’. A total of 91 SLTs from The Netherlands participated in data collection and analysis. The iterative process included three different qualitative research methodologies (thematic analysis [TA], constructivist grounded theory [CGT] and content analysis [CA]) to ensure validation of the results by means of method triangulation. Results SLTs considered nine themes: intelligibility, speech accuracy, persistence, the child's perception, impact, communicative participation, concomitant factors, professional point of view, and environmental factors. The themes were summarised in three main severity factors: (I) Speech accuracy, (II) The child's perception of the impact of their speech, and (III) Intelligibility in communication. Other severity factors were concomitant factors and impact. Expertise and support were identified as facilitators or barriers that may worsen or relieve the severity of SSD. Conclusions This study highlights the need for SLTs to rethink how they think about severity as a simplistic construct reflecting only speech accuracy. It is recommended that a broader holistic approach to measuring severity is adopted.
LINK
aphasia, speech apraxia, blended careDeze aanvraag is onderdeel van een structureel samenwerkingsverband van het UMCG Centrum voor Revalidatie met de Hanzehogeschool, afdeling Logopedie en de RUG, afdeling Taalwetenschappen, University College of Groningen en Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent. Het project heeft ten doel het verbeteren van de kwaliteit van de logopedische behandeling van spraak- en taalstoornissen na hersenletsel. Hierbij staat telkens het verbinden van theoretische inzichten uit de literatuur met klinisch opgedane inzichten voorop.
Zelfregie, empowerment, patiënt centraal: in elk rapport over de zorg komen we deze woorden tegen. Maar hoe doe je dat eigenlijk als zorgprofessional? Het project COMPLETE richt zich op de samenwerking tussen ouders van jonge kinderen met ontwikkelingsstoornissen en zorgprofessionals. Deze samenwerking is een van de belangrijkste aspecten van interventie bij jonge kinderen. Logopedisten werken dagelijks met peuters met taalontwikkelingsstoornissen. Taaltherapie is kindgericht, waarbij de samenwerking met ouders vaak slechts beperkt is vormgegeven. Logopedisten geven aan handelingsverlegenheid te ervaren in de samenwerking met ouders. Zij weten niet hoe ze echte betrokkenheid en partnerschap tot stand kunnen brengen. Ouders herkennen de ervaringen van professionals. Zij ervaren variatie in de mate waarin zij betrokken worden bij therapie en willen versterkt worden in de mogelijkheden om de ontwikkeling van hun kind te stimuleren. Het belang van samenwerking volgt ook uit effectstudies. Voor succesvolle interventies moeten ouders een belangrijke rol spelen in de behandeling, empowered worden en eigen regie ervaren. De urgentie van deze vraag komt specifiek aan de orde in de kennisagenda Logopedie en ouderbetrokkenheid is onderdeel van het kwaliteitsbeleid van de beroepsvereniging. Het project COMPLETE wil bijdragen aan de vragen van logopedisten en ouders. Het project start met kwalitatief onderzoek naar de behoeften en ervaren barrières in samenwerking bij logopedist en ouders en een systematisch literatuuronderzoek naar deze aspecten. Deze aspecten worden omgezet naar actieve doelstellingen waarmee professionals de samenwerking kunnen verbeteren. In de volgende stappen ontwikkelen we in co-design tools die hierbij ondersteunen. Daarnaast gaan we op zoek naar bestaande tools die we samen met de praktijk op bruikbaarheid testen en aanpassen. Het project resulteert in een toolbox voor samenwerking tussen logopedisten en ouders van jonge kinderen. De uitkomsten en opbrengsten van dit project zijn ook relevant voor andere zorgprofessionals die werken met ouders van jonge kinderen met ontwikkelingsstoornissen.
Youth care is under increasing pressure, with rising demand, longer waiting lists, and growing staff shortages. In the Netherlands, one in seven children and adolescents is currently receiving youth care. At the same time, professionals face high workloads, burnout risks, and significant administrative burdens. This combination threatens both the accessibility and quality of care, leading to escalating problems for young people and families. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising opportunities to relieve these pressures by supporting professionals in their daily work. However, many AI initiatives in youth care fail to move beyond pilot stages, due to barriers such as lack of user acceptance, ethical concerns, limited professional ownership, and insufficient integration into daily practice. Empirical research on how AI can be responsibly and sustainably embedded in youth care is still scarce. This PD project aims to develop practice-based insights and strategies that strengthen the acceptance and long-term adoption of AI in youth care, in ways that support professional practice and contribute to appropriate care. The focus lies not on the technology itself, but on how professionals can work with AI within complex, high-pressure contexts. The research follows a cyclical, participatory approach, combining three complementary implementation frameworks: the Implementation Guide (Kaptein), the CFIR model (Damschroder), and the NASSS-CAT framework (Greenhalgh). Three case studies serve as core learning environments: (1) a speech-to-text AI tool to support clinical documentation, (2) Microsoft Copilot 365 for organization-wide adoption in support teams, and (3) an AI chatbot for parents in high-conflict divorces. Throughout the project, professionals, clients, ethical experts, and organizational stakeholders collaborate to explore the practical, ethical, and organizational conditions under which AI can responsibly strengthen youth care services.
