Belevingen maken een landschap interessant om vrije tijd in te besteden. Een vrijetijdslandschap is een gebied waar ontspanning, vermaak en belevenissen een centrale rol in nemen. Maar is elk gebied een potentieel vrijetijdslandschap? En hoe ontstaat zo’n gebied? Gebeurd dit autonoom of zitten er partijen achter de knoppen? Dit essay gaat in op deze aspecten en richt zich specifiek op het Vechtdal en de rol van het programmabureau Ruimte voor de Vecht. Leidend voor de structuur van dit essay zijn de volgende onderzoeksvragen: • Wat zijn vrijetijdslandschappen en hoe komen deze tot ontwikkeling? • Met welke maatregelen zijn de ontwikkeling van vrijetijdslandschappen te ondersteunen? • Hoe zijn de ideeën van een vrijetijdslandschap toe te passen op het Vechtdal? • Welke rollen en acties zijn weggelegd voor het programmabureau Ruimte voor de Vecht om de transitie naar een vrijetijdslandschap te ondersteunen? volgende onderzoeksvragen.
Content moderation is commonly used by social media platforms to curb the spread of hateful content. Yet, little is known about how users perceive this practice and which factors may influence their perceptions. Publicly denouncing content moderation—for example, portraying it as a limitation to free speech or as a form of political targeting—may play an important role in this context. Evaluations of moderation may also depend on interpersonal mechanisms triggered by perceived user characteristics. In this study, we disentangle these different factors by examining how the gender, perceived similarity, and social influence of a user publicly complaining about a content-removal decision influence evaluations of moderation. In an experiment (n = 1,586) conducted in the United States, the Netherlands, and Portugal, participants witnessed the moderation of a hateful post, followed by a publicly posted complaint about moderation by the affected user. Evaluations of the fairness, legitimacy, and bias of the moderation decision were measured, as well as perceived similarity and social influence as mediators. The results indicate that arguments about freedom of speech significantly lower the perceived fairness of content moderation. Factors such as social influence of the moderated user impacted outcomes differently depending on the moderated user’s gender. We discuss implications of these findings for content-moderation practices.
What is the impact of blogging, either by journalists or readers, on journalism? Do entries on readers' blogs lead to stories for professional journalists and how is the work of a blogging journalist influenced by the fact that he or she nowadays has a second publication platform and is more in contact with readers through the blog? We conducted content analyses of blogs and interviewed professional and amateur bloggers with blogs on Dutch national and local newspaper websites as well as editors who are responsible for the blogs on the websites. Newspapers employ different strategies when it comes to allowing either journalists or readers to blog on their newspaper websites. Local papers seem to profit most when it comes to getting story leads, or even scoops, from readers' blogs. Blogs on national newspapers' websites function more as personal diaries for the bloggers. The blogs by journalists and invited experts seem to flourish more on national papers' websites. There is also a difference in the 'directions' that bloggers get. With a stricter policy, mostly meaning that off-topic entries are discouraged, readers' blogs are more focused and are more valuable for journalists looking for news.
![Snapchat als inspiratie: zo creeer je een betrokken community [4 tips]](https://publinova-harvester-content-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/thumbnails/files/previews/pdf/20240419030540554612.6a5190f5-92b6-4382-8074-36dd0990d19e-thumbnail-400x300.png)
