There has probably never been such an intense debate about the layout of the countryside as the one that is currently raging. There are serious concerns about the landscape, which is being rapidly transformed by urbanization and everything associated with this process, and not only in the Netherlands but also far beyond its borders. Everyone has something to say in this society-wide debate, from local to national governments, from environmental factions to the road-user's lobby, and from those who are professionally involved to concerned private parties. In many cases it is a battle between idealized images and economic models, between agricultural reality and urban park landscapes, between ecological concerns and mobility. This issue of OASE explores the potential significance of architectonic design for transformation processes on the regional scale. Besides considering the instruments that are available to the designer to fulfil this task, the authors also consider how the design can exercise a 'positive' influence on such processes. The various contributions shed light on the potential significance of territory in contemporary design practice and offer critical reflection on the topical discourse that has evolved over recent years.
With the rise of chronic diseases as the number one cause of death and disability among urban populations, it has become increasingly important to design for healthy environments. There is, however, a lack of interdisciplinary approaches and solutions to improve health and well-being through urban planning and design. This case study offers an HCI solution and approach to design for healthy urban structures and dynamics in existing neighborhoods. We discuss the design process and design of ROOT, an interactive lighting system that aims to stimulate walking and running through supportive, collaborative and social interaction.
Responsive public spaces use interactive technologies to adapt to users and situations. This enhances the quality of the space as a public realm. However, the application of responsive technologies in spatial design is still to be explored. What exactly are the options for incorporating responsive technologies in spatial designs to improve the quality of public spaces? The book Responsive Public Spaces explores and disentangles this new assignment for designers, and presents inspiring examples. A consortium of spatial designers, interaction designers and local stakeholders, headed by the Chair of Spatial Urban Transformation of Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, carried out a two-year practice-based study of responsive public spaces. This book draws on those insights to provide a practical approach and a roadmap for the new design process for responsive public spaces.The study results are of signi¬icance for various professional fields. The book is intended for clients and stakeholders involved in planning and design of public spaces, spatial designers, interaction designers and students.
Hoe kan de verblijfskwaliteit en veiligheidsperceptie van de publieke ruimte versterkt worden door de toepassing van “interactieve objecten”? (objecten die met beeld, licht, geluid en sensoren real time reageren op de gebruikers en de ruimte daarop afstemmen). De ontwikkeling van deze zogenaamde responsieve ruimte staat nog in de kinderschoenen maar is beloftevol vanwege de meerwaarde voor de leefbaarheid en het onderscheidend vermogen van de plek en de bedrijven. In Co-ReUs worden drie verschillende mkb groepen samengebracht: stedenbouwbureaus, creatieve conceptontwikkelaars en lokale ondernemers. We gebruiken de ArenA-Boulevard als proeftuin: een als ongezellig ervaren ruimte (lage verblijfskwaliteit en slechte veiligheidsperceptie). De mkb-ers lossen hiermee hun eigen praktijkproblemen op: Stedenbouwbureaus houden zich bezig met het ontwerp van de publieke ruimte. Zij merken dat hun instrumentarium (herontwerp, herbestrating etc.) te kapitaalintensief en te weinig flexibel is om de verblijfskwaliteit en veiligheidsperceptie op dit soort plekken op te lossen. De bureaus hebben behoefte aan een lichter, gerichter en responsiever instrumentarium. Ze hebben echter beperkte (technologische) kennis hoe interactieve objecten precies een bijdrage kunnen leveren. Creatieve conceptontwikkelaars hebben een ander probleem: zij hebben wél de beschikking over interactieve objecten (geluid, beeld, licht, sensoren) maar die zijn vooral kunstzinnig en evenementiëel. De objecten zijn stuk voor stuk niet ontwikkeld vanuit een stedenbouwkundige opgave waardoor ze hiervoor geen panklare oplossing vormen. Lokale mkb-ers hebben ook een probleem: zij weten niet goed hoe zij op een gecoördineerde manier invloed kunnen uitoefenen op de activering van de publieke ruimte. Project Co-ReUs: 1) analyseert hoe de ruimte wordt gebruikt (nulmeting en Programma van Eisen voor de inzet van interactieve objecten; 2) ontwikkelt ruimtelijk-interactieve interventies in co-creatie met de drie mkb groepen. 3) deze worden op het plein geplaatst en nametingen brengen de effecten in beeld. Het resultaat is een actiegerichte Handleiding met Roadmap voor de ontwikkeling van responsieve publieke ruimtes.
Digital technologies in public spaces have become more prescient, capable, and invisible. As a result, the need to explain and mediate these technologies has become more urgent. Current processes for designing digital trust interaction protocols, visual languages, and interfaces for the urban environment have been dominated by governing actors: policing, government, and tech-companies. When communities are involved in the design process, their participation is limited to formats these organisations prescribe. By default, these designs exclude the lived technological experiences of communities that use the built environment. The outcome is a lopsided appraisal of digital trust, and designs that are insufficiently transparent and equitable– and as a result, not understood and embraced by the communities who must use them. This design-research aims to develop prototypes that include how urban interactive technologies are ‘lived’ in the spaces where they are implemented. These experiences will be teased-out through site-specific aesthetic and performative actions, which in turn inform the design process. The envisioned contribution includes ways of ’doing’ to the field of situated design, and concrete prototypes for alternative digital trust protocols, visual languages, and interfaces. By flipping the current approach on its head, this research argues that the practical and ethical departure points for addressing digital ‘trust deficits’ are already within the diverse communities who use the built environment.
