Als na afloop van een brandincident een stoffelijk overschot wordt aangetroffen, is het van belang dat de causaliteit tussen de brand en het overlijden wordt onderzocht. Brand is zeer destructief voor het menselijk lichaam. Dit bemoeilijkt de interpretatie van onderzoeksbevindingen aan een lichaam. Er zijn diverse verschijnselen die tot op zekere hoogte duiden op vitaliteit (de betrokkene was levend) ten tijde van de brand. In dit artikel worden deze verschijnselen tegen het licht gehouden. Op basis van de huidige wetenschappelijke theorieën bestaan er geen verschijnselen die leiden tot de eenduidige conclusie over al dan niet vitale blootstelling. Wel kunnen verschijnselen een vermoeden van vitale blootstelling tot op zekere hoogte ondersteunen. Ontbreken de verschijnselen, dan is het niet mogelijk om een conclusie te trekken; de afwezigheid is geen bewijs van overlijden vóór het ontstaan van de brand. Om in de rechtszaal een uitspraak te kunnen doen over de causaliteit tussen brand en overlijden, wordt het noodzakelijk geacht om de waarde voor de aannemelijkheid van vitale blootstelling per verschijnsel te motiveren.
MULTIFILE
Of all patients in a hospital environment, trauma patients may be particularly at risk for developing (device-related) pressure ulcers (PUs), because of their traumatic injuries, immobility, and exposure to immobilizing and medical devices. Studies on device-related PUs are scarce. With this study, the incidence and characteristics of PUs and the proportion of PUs that are related to devices in adult trauma patients with suspected spinal injury were described. From January–December 2013, 254 trauma patients were visited every 2 days for skin assessment. The overall incidence of PUs was 28⋅3% (n = 72/254 patients). The incidence of device-related PUs was 20⋅1% (n = 51), and 13% (n = 33) developed solely device-related PUs. We observed 145 PUs in total of which 60⋅7% were related to devices (88/145). Device-related PUs were detected 16 different locations on the front and back of the body. These results show that the incidence of PUs and the proportion of device-related PUs is very high in trauma patients
Health care professionals responsible for patients with complex wounds need a particular level of expertise and education to ensure optimum wound care. However, uniform education for those working as wound care nurses is lacking. We aimed to reach consensus among experts from six European countries as to the competencies for specialised wound care nurses that meet international professional expectations and educational systems. Wound care experts including doctors, wound care nurses, lecturers, managers and head nurses were invited to contribute to an e-Delphi study. They completed online questionnaires based on the Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists framework. Suggested competencies were rated on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as an agreement of at least 75% for each competence. Response rates ranged from 62% (round 1) to 86% (rounds 2 and 3). The experts reached consensus on 77 (80%) competences. Most competencies chosen belonged to the domain 'scholar' (n = 19), whereas few addressed those associated with being a 'health advocate' (n = 7). Competencies related to professional knowledge and expertise, ethical integrity and patient commitment were considered most important. This consensus on core competencies for specialised wound care nurses may help achieve a more uniform definition and education for specialised wound care nurses.
