The Dutch version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire is an appropriate instrument for measuring patients' perceptions in acute low back pain patients, showing acceptable internal consistency and reliability. Concurrent validity is adequate, however, the instrument may be unsuitable for detecting changes in low back pain perception over time.
LINK
QUESTION: Do negative expectations in patients after the onset of acute low back pain increase the odds of absence from usual work due to progression to chronic low back pain?DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis of prospective inception cohort studies.PARTICIPANTS: Adults with acute or subacute non-specific low back pain.OUTCOME MEASURE: Absence from usual work at a given time point greater than 12 weeks after the onset of pain due to ongoing pain.RESULTS: Ten studies involving 4683 participants were included in the review. Participants with acute or subacute pain and negative expectations about their recovery had significantly greater odds of being absent from usual work at a given time point more than 12 weeks after the onset of pain: OR 2.17 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.91). The exclusion of five studies with the greatest risk of bias showed that the result was similar when more rigorous quality criteria were applied: OR 2.52 (95% CI 1.47 to 4.31).CONCLUSION: The odds that adults with acute or subacute non-specific low back pain and negative recovery expectations will remain absent from work due to progression to chronic low back pain are two times greater than for those with more positive expectations. These results were consistent across the included studies despite variations in the risk of bias.
DOCUMENT
BACKGROUND: The predictive validity of the Low Back Pain Perception Scale is determined in two studies in general practice and showed sufficient discriminative ability, although the psychometric properties of the scale have never been established until now.OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability and validity of the Low Back Pain Perception Scale in acute nonspecific low back pain patients.METHODS: The Low Back Pain Perception Scale has been authorized translated into Dutch by two bilingual content experts. A sample of 84 acute low back pain patients in physiotherapy primary care, mean age (SD) age 42 (12) years participated in this study. Internal reliability and a test-retest procedure within one-week interval were evaluated.RESULTS: The internal consistency Cronbach α=0.38 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.56) and test - retest reliability within one week Intra Class Correlation coefficient=0.50 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.64). Minimal Detectable Change was measured 1.95. The concurrent validity demonstrates Pearson's r=0.35 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.53).CONCLUSIONS:The Low Back Pain Perception Scale demonstrates poor internal consistency and reliability and moderate concurrent validity. Extreme high or low scores may be clinical relevant therefore the scale can be used as a first screening instrument.
LINK
Er lijkt een duidelijke mate van evidentie te bestaan betreffende de relatie fysieke activiteit, respectievelijk fitheid en gezondheid in de algemene populatie en bij bepaalde pathologieën. Er is evenwel nog behoefte aan verder wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar mogelijke determinanten en onderliggende mechanismen, als ook naar evidentie bij bepaalde, specifieke aandoeningen. Tevens mag duidelijk zijn dat ondanks de bestaande evidentie fysieke activiteit/oefening te weinig toegepast wordt in de gezondheidszorg. Het onderzoek naar de effectiviteit van gezondheidskundige interventies is dan ook uitermate belangrijk. Dit lectoraat hoopt dan ook een bescheiden bijdrage hieraan te kunnen leveren. Hiervoor heeft zij reeds afspraken tot samenwerking met de academische en medische wereld (in Utrecht, Amsterdam, Maastricht en Leuven), met de gezondheidszorg (RIVM Bilthoven en GG&GD Utrecht) en met de beroepen- of bedrijfswereld (Politie regio Utrecht; Enraf Nonius, Delft). De beoogde doelstellingen zullen echter naar alle waarschijnlijkheid beduidend meer tijd in beslag nemen dan de periode van 4 jaar die de Stichting Kennis Ontwikkeling voorzien heeft met betrekking tot het oprichten en financieren van de lectoraten.
DOCUMENT
Background: Patient education, home-based exercise therapy, and advice on returning to normal activities are established physiotherapeutic treatment options for patients with nonspecific low back pain (LBP). However, the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on health-related outcomes largely depends on patient self-management and adherence to exercise and physical activity recommendations. e-Exercise LBP is a recently developed stratified blended care intervention comprising a smartphone app integrated with face-to-face physiotherapy treatment. Following the promising effects of web-based applications on patients’ self-management skills and adherence to exercise and physical activity recommendations, it is hypothesized that e-Exercise LBP will improve patients’ physical functioning. Objective: This study aims to investigate the short-term (3 months) effectiveness of stratified blended physiotherapy (e-Exercise LBP) on physical functioning in comparison with face-to-face physiotherapy in patients with nonspecific LBP. Methods: The study design was a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial with intention-to-treat analysis. Patients with nonspecific LBP aged ≥18 years were asked to participate in the study. The patients were treated with either stratified blended physiotherapy or face-to-face physiotherapy. Both interventions were conducted according to the Dutch physiotherapy guidelines for nonspecific LBP. Blended physiotherapy was stratified according to the patients’ risk of developing persistent LBP using the Keele STarT Back Screening Tool. The primary outcome was physical functioning (Oswestry Disability Index, range 0-100). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, fear-avoidance beliefs, and self-reported adherence. Measurements were taken at baseline and at the 3-month follow-up. Results: Both the stratified blended physiotherapy group (104/208, 50%) and the face-to-face physiotherapy group (104/208, 50%) had improved clinically relevant and statistically significant physical functioning; however, there was no statistically significant or clinically relevant between-group difference (mean difference −1.96, 95% CI −4.47 to 0.55). For the secondary outcomes, stratified blended physiotherapy showed statistically significant between-group differences in fear-avoidance beliefs and self-reported adherence. In patients with a high risk of developing persistent LBP (13/208, 6.3%), stratified blended physiotherapy showed statistically significant between-group differences in physical functioning (mean difference −16.39, 95% CI −27.98 to −4.79) and several secondary outcomes. Conclusions: The stratified blended physiotherapy intervention e-Exercise LBP is not more effective than face-to-face physiotherapy in patients with nonspecific LBP in improving physical functioning in the short term. For both stratified blended physiotherapy and face-to-face physiotherapy, within-group improvements were clinically relevant. To be able to decide whether e-Exercise LBP should be implemented in daily physiotherapy practice, future research should focus on the long-term cost-effectiveness and determine which patients benefit most from stratified blended physiotherapy.
MULTIFILE
Background: Patient education, home-based exercise therapy, and advice on returning to normal activities are established physiotherapeutic treatment options for patients with nonspecific low back pain (LBP). However, the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on health-related outcomes largely depends on patient self-management and adherence to exercise and physical activity recommendations. e-Exercise LBP is a recently developed stratified blended care intervention comprising a smartphone app integrated with face-to-face physiotherapy treatment. Following the promising effects of web-based applications on patients’ self-management skills and adherence to exercise and physical activity recommendations, it is hypothesized that e-Exercise LBP will improve patients’ physical functioning. Objective: This study aims to investigate the short-term (3 months) effectiveness of stratified blended physiotherapy (e-Exercise LBP) on physical functioning in comparison with face-to-face physiotherapy in patients with nonspecific LBP. Methods The study design was a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial with intention-to-treat analysis. Patients with nonspecific LBP aged ≥18 years were asked to participate in the study. The patients were treated with either stratified blended physiotherapy or face-to-face physiotherapy. Both interventions were conducted according to the Dutch physiotherapy guidelines for nonspecific LBP. Blended physiotherapy was stratified according to the patients’ risk of developing persistent LBP using the Keele STarT Back Screening Tool. The primary outcome was physical functioning (Oswestry Disability Index, range 0-100). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, fear-avoidance beliefs, and self-reported adherence. Measurements were taken at baseline and at the 3-month follow-up. Results: Both the stratified blended physiotherapy group (104/208, 50%) and the face-to-face physiotherapy group (104/208, 50%) had improved clinically relevant and statistically significant physical functioning; however, there was no statistically significant or clinically relevant between-group difference (mean difference −1.96, 95% CI −4.47 to 0.55). For the secondary outcomes, stratified blended physiotherapy showed statistically significant between-group differences in fear-avoidance beliefs and self-reported adherence. In patients with a high risk of developing persistent LBP (13/208, 6.3%), stratified blended physiotherapy showed statistically significant between-group differences in physical functioning (mean difference −16.39, 95% CI −27.98 to −4.79) and several secondary outcomes. Conclusions: The stratified blended physiotherapy intervention e-Exercise LBP is not more effective than face-to-face physiotherapy in patients with nonspecific LBP in improving physical functioning in the short term. For both stratified blended physiotherapy and face-to-face physiotherapy, within-group improvements were clinically relevant. To be able to decide whether e-Exercise LBP should be implemented in daily physiotherapy practice, future research should focus on the long-term cost-effectiveness and determine which patients benefit most from stratified blended physiotherapy.
LINK
Background: Patient education, advice on returning to normal activities and (home-based) exercise therapy are established treatment options for patients with non-specific low back pain (LBP). However, the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on physical functioning and prevention of recurrent events largely depends on patient self-management, adherence to prescribed (home-based) exercises and recommended physical activity behaviour. Therefore we have developed e-Exercise LBP, a blended intervention in which a smartphone application is integrated within face-to-face care. E-Exercise LBP aims to improve patient self-management skills and adherence to exercise and physical activity recommendations and consequently improve the effectiveness of physiotherapy on patients’ physical functioning. The aim of this study is to investigate the short- (3 months) and long-term (12 and 24 months) effectiveness on physical functioning and cost-effectiveness of e-Exercise LBP in comparison to usual primary care physiotherapy in patients with LBP. Methods: This paper presents the protocol of a prospective, multicentre cluster randomized controlled trial. In total 208 patients with LBP pain were treated with either e-Exercise LBP or usual care physiotherapy. E-Exercise LBP is stratified based on the risk for developing persistent LBP. Physiotherapists are able to monitor and evaluate treatment progress between face-to-face sessions using patient input from the smartphone application in order to optimize physiotherapy care. The smartphone application contains video-supported self-management information, video-supported exercises and a goal-oriented physical activity module. The primary outcome is physical functioning at 12-months follow-up. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, physical activity, adherence to prescribed (home-based) exercises and recommended physical activity behaviour, self-efficacy, patient activation and health-related quality of life. All measurements will be performed at baseline, 3, 12 and 24months after inclusion. An economic evaluation will be performed from the societal and the healthcare perspective and will assess cost-effectiveness of e-Exercise LBP compared to usual physiotherapy at 12 and 24months. Discussion: A multi-phase development and implementation process using the Center for eHealth Research Roadmap for the participatory development of eHealth was used for development and evaluation. The findings will provide evidence on the effectiveness of blended care for patients with LBP and help to enhance future implementation of blended physiotherapy.
DOCUMENT
Logopedisten en klinisch linguïsten onderzoeken de taalontwikkeling van jonge kinderen met een vermoedelijke of al vastgestelde taalontwikkelingsstoornis. Ze onderzoeken ook de taalvaardigheid van personen met afasie. Naast gestandaardiseerde tests worden samples spontane taal geanalyseerd. Hiervoor worden uitingen ontlokt aan de patiënten via vaste protocollen. De sessies worden opgenomen, getranscribeerd en vervolgens grammaticaal geanalyseerd. Bij de grammaticale analyse wordt bepaald welke soorten constructies en fouten voorkomen en in welke mate, en dit wordt vergeleken met een norm. Taal- en spraaktechnologie (TST) kan er in prin-cipe aan bijdragen om het proces van transcriptie en grammaticale analyse efficiënter te maken en mogelijk zelfs om de kwaliteit van de assessments te verhogen. In dit artikel richten we ons op de mogelijkheden van TST voor de analyse van kindertaal.
LINK
Mensen wie het vanwege langdurige stress niet lukt om aan een oplossing te werken, kunnen baat hebben bij extra ondersteuning die gericht is op het versterken of tijdelijk vervangen van deze cognitieve capaciteiten. Psycho-educatie is zo ’n vorm van ondersteuning. Het doel van psycho-educatie is om mensen bewust te maken van de invloed die stress op hun leven heeft, zodat ze samen met hun coach op zoek kunnen gaan naar manieren om ondanks de stress te werken aan een oplossing. Deze oplossingen kunnen hele simpele strategieën zijn, zoals herinneringen in je telefoon, zodat je je afspraken niet meer vergeet. Het doel van psycho-educatie is niet in eerste instantie het wegnemen van stress bronnen, maar het beter kunnen omgaan met de stress, zodat men in het hier en nu kan werken aan een lange termijn oplossing. In voorliggende implementatiegids is uitgewerkt hoe psycho-educatie bij financiële problemen kan worden ingezet. Er wordt beschreven uit welke stappen psycho-educatie bestaat, wat de eerste ervaringen zijn van cliënten en professionals en welke tips helpen bij implementatie. Hierbij wordt gebruik gemaakt van een uitgebreidere uitwerking van de principes van psycho-educatie die te vinden is in het boek Stress-sensitief werken (Jungmann, Wesdorp & Madern, 2020).
MULTIFILE
Lage rugpijn is een veel voorkomende aandoening en een belangrijke reden voor patiënten om de eerstelijnsfysiotherapeut te bezoeken. De sociaaleconomische gevolgen van lage rugpijn zijn groot en worden voor het leeuwendeel veroorzaakt door patiënten die lijden aan chronische pijnklachten met als mogelijk gevolg veel medische consumptie, (langdurend) ziekteverzuim en arbeidsongeschiktheid. Om chronische rugpijn te voorkomen is het belangrijk om in een vroeg stadium de kans hierop in te kunnen schatten door psychosociale en mogelijk andere risicofactoren op chronische pijnklachten te herkennen. In de fysiotherapierichtlijn lage rugpijn ontbreekt een heldere aanbeveling over de wijze waarop deze risicofactoren moeten worden gemeten en geïnterpreteerd. Dientengevolge worden in de praktijk hiervoor verschillende vragenlijsten en/of criteria gebruikt. Onder fysiotherapeuten is er vraag naar een hanteerbare en accurate methodiek om deze risico-inschatting te kunnen maken. Fysiotherapeuten zijn met deze vraag naar het lectoraat Musculoskeletale Revalidatie van de Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen gegaan en dit heeft aanleiding gegeven om samen met projectpartners een onderzoek op te zetten waarin een dergelijke methodiek ontwikkeld wordt. De voorgestelde methodiek betreft een Clinical Decision Support Tool: een digitale tool waarmee op basis van patiëntkarakteristieken en meetinstrumenten een geïndividualiseerde kans op chronische pijn kan worden bepaald gekoppeld aan een behandeladvies conform de lage rugpijnrichtlijn. Om dit te bereiken zal eerst worden geïnventariseerd welke methoden fysiotherapeuten nu reeds gebruiken en welke in de literatuur worden genoemd. Op basis hiervan wordt een keuze gemaakt t.a.v. data die digitaal verzameld gaan worden in minimaal 16 fysiotherapiepraktijken waarbij patiënten gedurende 12 weken gevolgd gaan worden. Met de verzamelde data worden met machine-learning algoritmes ontwikkeld voor het berekenen van de kans op chroniciteit. De algoritmes worden ingebouwd in een en online calculator, de Clinical Decision Support Tool, en een gebruiksvriendelijke prototype app. Bij het ontwikkelen van de tool worden de eindgebruikers (fysiotherapeuten maar ook patiënten) intensief betrokken. Op deze manier wordt gegarandeerd dat de tool aansluit bij de wensen en behoeften van de doelgroep. De tool berekent de kans op chroniciteit en geeft een behandeladvies. Daarnaast kan de tool gebruikt worden om patiënten te informeren en te betrekken bij de besluitvorming.
