Across European cities local entrepreneurs are joining forces in new ways, forming collectives to stimulate business growth and innovation and to create a more attractive business environment. The value of such collectives is increasingly recognized by local governments and policy measures to stimulate these initiatives are being developed. Amsterdam hosts different collaborative initiatives, including 39 business improvement districts (BIDs).The Knowledge Mile is such a collective in which shopkeepers, other local SMEs, residents work together to collectively improve a large retail area. The city of Amsterdam is also a stakeholder. Government can fill an important role in enabling the creation of collective resource management in urban settings. However, if effective regulation is missing, citizens and governing bodies have to look for incentives to find new means of addressing governance. As such, the potential for collective management of urban commons may be greater than realized so far, as there is still a lack of knowledge in this area. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap. By means of an embedded case study approach, we analyze the interaction between the stakeholders in their development of a green zone, the Knowledge Mile Park, in the Wibautstraat. In the coming years, roofs, facades and ground level will be changed through a collaboration of residents, entrepreneurs, researchers, civil servants and students in a metropolitan Living Lab. In this Living Lab, solutions for a healthy and social environment, climate resistance and biodiversity are jointly developed, tested and shown. In our study, we will analyze the role of the governing bodies in such initiatives, and make recommendations how collectives can become more mainstream with new kinds of institutions, without an undue burden on the community.
MULTIFILE
When corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a sensemaking process is assessed from a corporate governance perspective, this implies that stakeholders do not only influence companies by promoting and enforcing regulations and other corporate guidelines. They also influence companies by promoting regulation on influence pathways, by demanding that companies develop formal mechanisms that allow companies and stakeholders to discuss and in some cases agree on changes to principles and policies. This perspective suggests that regulation is an outcome of power relations and is, as such, a reflection of certain mental models. As such, mental models reveal the political bias in corporate governance perspectives. For this reason, CSR research needs to be clear about the underlying assumptions about corporate governance, and corporate governance research needs to disclose which mental models of CSR influence the outcomes. Taking a governance perspective on the development of mental models of CSR helps to understand the interaction between CSR and processes of sensemaking at the institutional, organizational and individual levels.
The external expectations of organizational accountability force organizational leaders to find solutions and answers in organizational (and information) governance to assuage the feelings of doubt and unease about the behaviour of the organization and its employees that continuously seem to be expressed in the organizational environment. Organizational leaders have to align the interests of their share– and stakeholders in finding a balance between performance and accountability, individual and collective ethical approaches, and business ethics based on compliance, based on integrity, or both. They have to integrate accountability in organizational governance based on a strategy that defines boundaries for rules and routines. They need to define authority structures and find ways to control the behaviour of their employees, without being very restrictive and coercive. They have to implement accountability structures in organizational interactions that are extremely complex, nonlinear, and dynamic, in which (mostly informal) relational networks of employees traverse formal structures. Formal processes, rules, and regulations, used for control and compliance, cannot handle such environments, continuously in ‘social flux’, unpredictable, unstable, and (largely) unmanageable. It is a challenging task that asks exceptional management skills from organizational leaders. The external expectations of accountability cannot be neglected, even if it is not always clear what is exactly meant with that concept. Why is this (very old) concept still of importance for modern organizations?In this book, organizational governance, information governance, and accountability are the core subjects, just like the relationship between them. A framework is presented of twelve manifestations of organizational accountability the every organization had to deal with. An approach is introduced for strategically govern organizational accountability with three components: behaviour, accountability, and external assessments. The core propositions in this book are that without paying strategic attention to the behaviour of employees and managers and to information governance and management, it will be extremely difficult for organizational leaders to find a balance between the two objectives of organizational governance: performance and accountability.
Het postdoc-onderzoek Building Adaptive Tourism Areas beoogt om een bijdrage te leveren aan het vergroten van de adaptiviteit van toeristische bestemmingen. Adaptiviteit is een essentiële eigenschap in de huidige dynamische netwerk samenleving en globaliserende economie. Toeristisch-recreatieve bestemming moeten meebewegen met zaken als toenemende concurrentie en professionalisering, veranderend consumentengedrag, nieuwe technologieën die nieuwe kansen en uitdagingen met zich mee brengen, de maatschappelijke roep om duurzaamheid, kortere levenscycli van concepten, de vraag om bestemmingen in balans als gevolg van ‘overtourism’ en zo meer. In dit onderzoek nemen we het perspectief dat bestemmingen complexe, open systemen zijn die de potentie hebben om adaptief te zijn. Complexe systemen omdat een veelheid aan actoren en factoren de ontwikkelingsrichting van bestemmingen beïnvloeden. Open systemen omdat vele invloeden van buitenaf komen die op vrijwel autonome wijze ontwikkelingsrichtingen van bestemmingen beïnvloeden. Adaptiviteit is het vermogen om mee te bewegen met dergelijke dynamiek door middel van series van stapsgewijze aanpassingen. Het onderzoek Building Adaptive Tourism Areas focust specifiek op het beter begrijpen van wat de ambitie van het vergroten van het adaptieve vermogen in de praktijk betekent. De studie bestaat uit drie stappen: 1.) duiden van “key conditions” voor adaptiviteit: de elementen die noodzakelijk zijn voor adaptief vermogen, en deze vertalen naar de context van het toerisme; 2.) identificeren van ‘traps’: condities voor adaptiviteit komen met implicaties en daarmee samenhangende praktische beperkingen 3.) uiteenzetten van ‘practicable strategies: acties die helpen om te bouwen aan adaptieve bestemmingen. De output van het project zijn diverse artikelen en academische journals en professionele tijdschriften. De bevindingen worden (direct) ingebracht in de opleidingen van de Academy of Leisure & Tourism van NHL Stenden Hogeschool en verder ontplooid binnen het European Tourism Futures Institute (ETFI – www.etfi.eu).
Het doel van dit interdisciplinaire SIA KIEM project Fluïde Eigenschap in de Creatieve Industrie is te onderzoeken of en hoe gedeelde vormen van eigenaarschap in de creatieve industrie kunnen bijdragen aan het creëren van een democratischer en duurzamer economie, waarin ook het MKB kan participeren in digitale innovatie. Het project geeft een overzicht van beschikbare vormen van (gedeeld) eigenaarschap, hun werking en hoe deze creatieve professionals kunnen ondersteunen bij de transitie naar de platformeconomie. Dit wordt toegepast op een concrete case, dat van een digitale breimachine. Naast het leveren van een goede praktijk, moet het project leiden tot een groter internationaal onderzoeksvoorstel over Fluid Ownership in the Creative Industry, dat dieper ingaat op de beschikbare eigendomsoplossingen en hoe deze waarde zullen creëren voor de creatieve professional.
