De sfeer van een ruimte of omgeving is een belangrijke factor in de beleving van die ruimte door een bezoeker. Om het belang van de factor sfeer te kunnen vaststellen is een goed meetinstrument nodig. In deze studie wordt een voorstel gedaan voor een dergelijk meetinstrument. Hiertoe wordt een meta-analyse uitgevoerd op bestaande empirische en theoretische studies naar sfeer. Deze studies komen uit de marketingliteratuur en uit museum studies. Winkels en musea zijn twee relevante voorbeelden van waar sfeer een evidente rol speelt in de ervaring van bezoekers en hun gedrag. Het is dan ook niet verwonderlijk dat er vanuit deze disciplines redelijk wat aandacht is geweest voor sfeer.
While sustainability of transport projects is of increasing importance, the concept of sustainability can be understood in many different ways by the stakeholders that are involved in or affected by mobility projects. In this paper, we compare the outcomes of the assessment of sustainability of projects through a multi-criteria analysis (MCA) and the appraisal of stakeholder preferences through the multi-actor multi-criteria analysis (MAMCA). Evaluating projects with both tools and comparing the outcomes can provide insight into the stakeholder support of sustainable solutions and the sustainability of alternatives preferred by stakeholders. The sustainability of projects is assessed through 16 criteria grouped under the three pillars of sustainability. They were selected by in-depth review of 16 case studies of mobility projects, 18 transport evaluation schemes and the ranking of potential criteria by 214 stakeholders in North-West Europe. These criteria were weighted by 93 representatives of decision makers in the mobility domain. Stakeholder preferences were appraised through the criteria identified for each stakeholder group. We illustrate the framework by evaluating alternative solutions to improve cycling connections between the towns of Tilburg and Waalwijk in the Netherlands. The results of the comparison show that stakeholder preferences are biased towards one or two of the sustainability pillars (economy, environment, society) in three ways: through the selection of the criteria by the stakeholders, the weights of each criterion by each stakeholder group and differences in the final ranking of alternatives between the stakeholder groups and the MCA.
MULTIFILE
In this Masterclass we will discuss factors to consider when critically appraising standardised assessments and outcome measures for practice and research. This includes the assessments’ purpose, content and level of measurement, the adequacy of standardisation, and evidence of validity, reliability, and clinical utility. Several websites and resources to support your critical appraisal will be shared.The Masterclass is being delivered by Professor Alison Laver-Fawcett, Professor in Occupational Therapy at York St John University and Chair of ROTOS, and Emeritus Professor Diane Cox, co-authors of the textbook Principles of Assessment and Outcome Measurement for Allied Health Professionals: Practice, Research and Development, and Dr Margo van Hartingsveldt, Associate Professor, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences. Both Alison and Margo have experience in developing and standardising occupational therapy assessments, including the development of assessments during their PhD studies.
