Article about social work and social policy in the Netherlands. It gives information about the background, history, the meaning of the profession and the different types of professional areas in which the profession is divided. Other subjects are: social work curricula, the European dimension of social work an current challenges for social professionals in the Netherlands.
Het project ‘Creatief MKB Limburg’ is in 2009 o.a. ontstaan vanuit de behoefte van een aantal jonge creatieve ondernemers uit Heerlen aan ondersteuning bij hun ondernemerschap . Ondernemen vereist naast de wil en de bereidheid om risico te lopen in het aan de man brengen van je diensten, ook specifieke kennis en vaardigheden. Niet iedereen is vanzelfsprekend in het bezit van de benodigde kwaliteiten, maar deze ‘creatieve zoekers’ zijn bereid zich te ontwikkelen. In 2009 gaat het project ‘Creatief MKB Limburg’ van start. Hierbij zijn diverse partijen betrokken, waaronder het Lectoraat Toerisme en Cultuur van Hogeschool Zuyd, Gemeente Heerlen en een aantal maatschappelijke organisaties. Zij gaan samenwerken onder leiding van programmaleider Herman Langeveld. Binnen het programmavoorstel worden een drietal deelprojecten gelokaliseerd, en ook de sturing en operationalisering worden vastgesteld. Het project wordt in augustus 2011 afgesloten en levert een aantal resultaten op. Zo is er o.a. door middel van gesprekken met creatieve ondernemers kennis opgebouwd omtrent hun behoeften, hebben bestaande netwerken hun kennis en bereik vergroot, en binnen de Hogeschool is er meer coaching- en trainingsmateriaal voor handen. Creatieve ondernemers uit de kunstensector zijn zich er na het project meer van bewust dat economische en bedrijfsmatige elementen behoren tot het ondernemerschap. Alle projectresultaten komen verder in de uitgave tot uitdrukking.
In the field of climate change adaptation, the future matters. River futures influence the way adaptation projects are implemented in rivers. In this paper, we challenge the ways in which dominant paradigms and expert claims monopolise the truth concerning policies and designs of river futures, thereby sidelining and delegitimising alternative river futures. So far, limited work has been performed on the power of river futures in the context of climate change adaptation. We conceptualised the power of river futures through river imaginaries, i.e., collectively performed and publicly envisioned reproductions of riverine socionatures mobilised through truth claims of social life and order. Using the Border Meuse project as a case study, a climate change adaptation project in a stretch of the river Meuse in the south of the Netherlands, and a proclaimed success story of climate adaptation in Dutch water management, we elucidated how three river imaginaries (a modern river imaginary, a market-driven imaginary, and an eco-centric river imaginary) merged into an eco-modern river imaginary. Importantly, not only did the river futures merge, but their aligned truth regimes also merged. Thus, we argue that George Orwell’s famous quote, “who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present, controls the past” can be extended to “who controls the future, controls how we see and act in the present, and how we rediscover the past”.
The Dutch main water systems face pressing environmental, economic and societal challenges due to climatic changes and increased human pressure. There is a growing awareness that nature-based solutions (NBS) provide cost-effective solutions that simultaneously provide environmental, social and economic benefits and help building resilience. In spite of being carefully designed and tested, many projects tend to fail along the way or never get implemented in the first place, wasting resources and undermining trust and confidence of practitioners in NBS. Why do so many projects lose momentum even after a proof of concept is delivered? Usually, failure can be attributed to a combination of eroding political will, societal opposition and economic uncertainties. While ecological and geological processes are often well understood, there is almost no understanding around societal and economic processes related to NBS. Therefore, there is an urgent need to carefully evaluate the societal, economic, and ecological impacts and to identify design principles fostering societal support and economic viability of NBS. We address these critical knowledge gaps in this research proposal, using the largest river restoration project of the Netherlands, the Border Meuse (Grensmaas), as a Living Lab. With a transdisciplinary consortium, stakeholders have a key role a recipient and provider of information, where the broader public is involved through citizen science. Our research is scientifically innovative by using mixed methods, combining novel qualitative methods (e.g. continuous participatory narrative inquiry) and quantitative methods (e.g. economic choice experiments to elicit tradeoffs and risk preferences, agent-based modeling). The ultimate aim is to create an integral learning environment (workbench) as a decision support tool for NBS. The workbench gathers data, prepares and verifies data sets, to help stakeholders (companies, government agencies, NGOs) to quantify impacts and visualize tradeoffs of decisions regarding NBS.
