Background: Research on maternity care often focuses on factors that prevent good communication and collaboration and rarely includes important stakeholders – parents – as co-researchers. To understand how professionals and parents in Dutch maternity care accomplish constructive communication and collaboration, we examined their interactions in the clinic, looking for “good practice”. Methods: We used the video-reflexive ethnographic method in 9 midwifery practices and 2 obstetric units. Findings: We conducted 16 meetings where participants reflected on video recordings of their clinical interactions. We found that informal strategies facilitate communication and collaboration: “talk work” – small talk and humour – and “work beyond words” – familiarity, use of sight, touch, sound, and non-verbal gestures. When using these strategies, participants noted that it is important to be sensitive to context, to the values and feelings of others, and to the timing of care. Our analysis of their ways of being sensitive shows that good communication and collaboration involves “paradoxical care”, e.g., concurrent acts of “regulated spontaneity” and “informal formalities”. Discussion: Acknowledging and reinforcing paradoxical care skills will help caregivers develop the competencies needed to address the changing demands of health care. The video-reflexive ethnographic method offers an innovative approach to studying everyday work, focusing on informal and implicit aspects of practice and providing a bottom up approach, integrating researchers, professionals and parents. Conclusion: Good communication and collaboration in maternity care involves “paradoxical care” requiring social sensitivity and self-reflection, skills that should be included as part of professional training.
Background: Talking Mats is a framework developed to support communication with communication vulnerable people. Objective: The objective was twofold: to provide an overview of the objectives, target groups and settings for which Talking Mats has been used (Part 1), and an overview of empirical scientific knowledge on the use of Talking Mats (Part 2). Methods: In this scoping review scientific and grey literature was searched in PubMed, Cinahl, Psycinfo, Google, and Google Scholar. Articles that described characteristics of Talking Mats or its use were included. For Part 2, additional selection criteria were applied to focus on empirical scientific knowledge. Results: The search yielded 73 publications in Part 1, 12 of which were included in Part 2. Talking Mats was used for functional objectives (e.g. goal setting) and to improve communication and involvement. Part 2 showed that Talking Mats had positive influences on technical communication, effectiveness of conversations, and involvement and decision making in conversations. However, the level of research evidence is limited. Conclusions: Talking Mats can be used to support conversations between professionals and communication vulnerable people. More research is needed to study the views of people who are communication vulnerable and to study the effects of Talking Mats.
Self-efficacy and outcome expectations regarding client activation determine professionals’ level of actively engaging clients during daily activities. The Client Activation Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectation Scales for nurses and domestic support workers (DSWs) were developed to measure these concepts. This study aimed to assess their psychometric properties. Cross-sectional data from a sample of Dutch nurses (n=150) and DSWs (n=155) were analysed. Descriptive statistics were used to examine floor and ceiling effects. Construct validity was assessed by testing research-based hypotheses. Internal consistency was determined with Cronbach’s alpha. The scales for nurses showed a ceiling effect. There were no floor or ceiling effects in the scales for domestic support workers. Three out of five hypotheses could be confirmed (construct validity). For all scales, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients exceeded 0.70. In conclusion, all scales had moderate construct validity and high internal consistency. Further research is needed concerning their construct validity, testretest reliability and sensitivity to change.
Een derde van de Nederlanders heeft beperkte gezondheidsvaardigheden. Mensen met chronische aandoeningen komen in de eerstelijns fysiotherapiepraktijk. Het is lastig voor mensen met een chronische aandoening om de eigen gedachten over klachten over te brengen aan de fysiotherapeut. Als bovendien de fysiotherapeut de beperkte gezondheidsvaardigheden niet herkent kan dit leiden tot een onvolledig biopsychosociaal beeld van de cliënt, onvrede over de communicatie en de keuze van de behandeling. Eerstelijns fysiotherapeuten vragen hulp bij het gesprek tijdens het eerste consult met cliënten met chronische aandoeningen en beperkte gezondheidsvaardigheden.
In revalidatie-behandelteams zijn ergotherapeuten de ‘primus inter pares’ voor advisering over hulpmiddelen; hulpmiddelen die mensen met beperkingen ondersteunen bij activiteiten in zelfverzorging, onderwijs, spel, arbeid en wonen. Behoud van deze expertrol vraagt van ergotherapeuten om de nieuwste technologieën te integreren in de praktijk. Een snelgroeiende ontwikkeling betreft technologie waarmee men zelfhulpmiddelen kan ontwikkelen, maken of aanpassen. Zogenaamde do-it-yourself-technologie (DIY) met 3D-printing als bekendste voorbeeld. Revalidatie-ergotherapeuten van Adelante, Libra en Sevagram willen met DIY-technologie aan de slag om hulpmiddelen meer op maat, goedkoper en sneller te vervaardigen in nauwe samenwerking met hun cliënten. Onduidelijk is echter hoe een revalidatiedienst met DIY-technologie eruit kan zien, hoe deze in te bedden is in de dagelijkse praktijk, en hoe doorontwikkeling bewerkstelligd kan worden. Maken van hulpmiddelen met DIY-technologie past bij de identiteit van de ergotherapeut, maar vraagt om nieuwe werkwijzen en samenwerkingsverbanden om nieuwe kennis over techniek, ontwerpen en over materialen. Daarnaast spelen vragen van medische, financiële, ethische en juridische aard een rol. Met de ergotherapeuten kwamen we tot de volgende hoofdvraag: Hoe maken we als ergotherapeuten DIY-technologie, zoals 3D-printen, tot een integraal onderdeel van onze praktijk om met onze cliënten tot maatwerk-hulpmiddelen te komen? Deze vraag wordt binnen de drie centra, in vier fasen (analyse, design/testen, implementatie, doorontwikkeling) opgepakt met actieonderzoek als centrale methode en een diversiteit aan kwalitatieve en kwantitatieve manieren van gegevensverzameling. Partners in deze projectaanvraag (revalidatie-professionals, kennisinstellingen, brancheorganisaties, cliëntenorganisaties en ondernemers) zijn overtuigd dat DIY-technologie meerwaarde biedt voor het aanbod aan hulpmiddelen en invloed heeft op de eigen regie en participatie van cliënten. Met ondersteuning van hun uitgebreide expertise wordt de nieuwe dienst beschreven en wordt een toolbox DIY-technologie ontwikkeld en geïmplementeerd. Ook wordt een database voor zelfgemaakte hulpmiddelen en een DIY-community gerealiseerd. Deze kennis wordt gebruikt in het onderwijs van ergotherapie, Healthcare Engineering en Communication and Multimedia-Design.
communicative participation, language disordersOBJECTIVE(S)/RESEARCH QUESTION(S) Speech and language therapists (SLTs) are the primary care professionals to treat language and communication disorders. Their treatment is informed by a variety of outcome measures. At present, diagnosis, monitoring of progress and evaluation are often based on performance-based and clinician-reported outcomes such as results of standardized speech, language, voice, or communication tests. These tests typically aim to capture how well the person can produce or understand language in a controlled situation, and therefore only provide limited insight in the person’s challenges in life. Performance measures do not incorporate the unobservable feelings such as a patient's effort, social embarrassment, difficulty, or confidence in communication. Nor do they address language and communication difficulties experienced by the person themselves, the impact on daily life or allow patients to set goals related to their own needs and wishes. The aim of our study is give our patients a voice and empower SLTs to incorporate their patient's perspective in planning therapy. We will Aangemaakt door ProjectNet / Generated by ProjectNet: 08-12-2020 12:072Subsidieaanvraag_digitaal / Grant Application_digitaalDossier nummer / Dossier number: 80-86900-98-041DEFINITIEFdevelop a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure that provides information on communicative participation of people with communication disorders and integrate this item bank in patient specific goal setting in speech and language therapy. Both the item bank and the goal setting method will be adapted in cocreation with patients to enable access for people with communication difficulties.STUDY DESIGN Mixed methods research design following the MRC guidance for process evaluation of complex interventions, using PROMIS methodology including psychometric evaluation and an iterative user-centered design with qualitative co-creation methods to develop accessible items and the goal setting method.RESEARCH POPULATION Children, adolescents and adults with speech, language, hearing, and voice disorders.OUTCOME MEASURES An online patient-reported outcome measure on communicative participation, the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB), CPIB items that are accessible for people with language understanding difficulties, a communicative-participation person-specific goal setting method developed with speech and language therapists and patients and tested on usability and feasibility in clinical practice, and a course for SLTs explaining the use of the goal-setting method in their clinical reasoning process.RELEVANCE This study answers one of the prioritized questions in the call for SLTs to systematically and reliably incorporate the clients’ perspective in their daily practice to improve the quality of SLT services. At present patient reported outcomes play only a small role in speech and language therapy because 1) measures (PROMS) are often invalid, not implemented and unsuitable for clinical practice and 2) there is a knowledge gap in how to capture and interpret outcomes from persons with language disorders.
