Peer-coaching omvat een helpende relatie waarin twee mensen van gelijke status actief deelnemen en daarbij leren van elkaar. Binnen het hoger onderwijs wordt peer-coaching steeds vaker toegepast, waarbij studenten hun peers kunnen helpen en ondersteunen. Begrijpelijk want peer-coaching heeft bewezen positieve effecten voor zowel de coach als coachee. Bij het Studentsucces centrum (SSC), dat sinds 2020 is opgericht om de binding en het welzijn van studenten te versterken, is het bieden van ondersteuning middels peer-coaching een kernactiviteit. Binnen elk SSC zijn een of meerdere getrainde studenten actief als studentbuddy’s. In deze studie is gekeken naar de opbrengsten van de peer-to-peer begeleiding. Daarbij viel direct op dat de coaching die de buddies op dit moment bij het SSC bieden veelal van korte duur en gericht op oppervlakkige en praktische vragen en er derhalve niet echt sprake is van een coachings-traject. Daarbij blijft het aantal coaching-aanvragen laag, terwijl er bewijs is dat studenten wel ondersteuning zouden willen en nodig hebben op studie-gerelateerd en emotioneel gebied. Wat kan er volgens de studenten gedaan worden om de peer-coaching te intensiveren? Door te ontdekken hoe de studentbuddy’s en peers de coaching en alles wat daarbij komt kijken hebben ervaren, zijn waardevolle lessen geleerd worden voor de promotie en ontwikkeling van peer-to-peer begeleiding. Daartoe is er op exploratieve wijze onderzocht wat de behoeften, ervaringen en opbrengsten zijn van zowel de studentbuddy’s als de gecoachte peers. Er is onder andere gekeken naar de bekendheid van het SSC, hoe betrokken de studenten zich voelen bij het SSC, hoe tevreden de studenten zijn met het SSC en wat de peer-coaching doet met de persoonlijke en professionele ontwikkeling en het studiesucces. In totaal zijn tien student-buddy’s en zes peers geïnterviewd. Onder de geïnterviewde buddy’s is er een grote verscheidenheid aan de hoeveelheid gecoachte peers, de duur van de coaching trajecten en de inhoud ervan. De bekendheid van het SSC en met name de peer-coaching mogelijkheden die aangeboden worden, zijn als belangrijkste verbeterpunt in het licht van het relatief lage aantal coaching aanvragen, genoemd. De buddy’s zijn zelf vaak per toeval bekend geworden met het SSC en waren vaak voor hun rol als studentbuddy er nog niet bekend mee. Wel geven de meeste studentbuddy’s aan zich zeer betrokken te voelen bij het team en de peers die ze coachen, zich persoonlijk te hebben ontwikkeld en tevreden te zijn met de werkzaamheden. De buddy’s voelen zich meer zelfverzekerd, zijn sterker geworden in hun sociale vaardigheden en voelen zich meer thuis op de hogeschool. De geïnterviewde peers ontvingen individuele coaching bij plannen, motivatie vinden, studieopdrachten en wegwijs worden op de hogeschool. Alle peers gaven aan dat de peer-coaching belangrijk is en het hen helpt. Dat studentbuddy’s meer tijd hebben, makkelijker benaderbaar zijn en informeler communiceren dan bijvoorbeeld docenten en decanen, werden als voordelen genoemd. Ook de peers gaven aan dat het SSC niet heel bekend is onder de studenten. Ze gaven aan vaak doorverwezen te zijn door een docent of studieloopbaanbegeleider, of per toeval in contact zijn gekomen met een studentbuddy. De peers voelen zich zeer betrokken bij de studentbuddy, maar niet bij het SSC en zijn meestal niet bekend met andere activiteiten die het SSC aanbiedt. Tot slot geven de peers aan dat de peer-coaching heeft geholpen bij hun studievaardigheden, stressvermindering en ook meer thuis voelen op de hogeschool. In de literatuur worden voordelen van peer-coaching op de academische prestaties, het zelfvertrouwen, de motivatie bevorderen, maar ook praktische en emotionele ondersteuning beschreven. Wie zien in deze studie bij onze SSC’s dat, hoe kleinschalig of kortdurend dan ook, de peer-to-peer aanpak inderdaad deze voordelen oplevert. Gezien de aard van sommige hulpvragen, is langdurige coaching niet altijd noodzakelijk. Tevens laat deze studie zien dat het ook voordelen voor de studentbuddy’s zelf, zoals meer betrokken worden op de hogeschool en verbeterde vaardigheden, oplevert. Ondanks de behoefte aan peer-coaching en promotieactiviteiten van het SSC, weten studenten de weg naar het SSC nog niet goed te vinden. Er lijken grote verschillen te zijn in de vorm en inhoud van de peer-coaching tussen studentbuddy’s. Een duidelijkere afbakening en routekaart van hulpbronnen binnen de hogeschool, zou het SSC meer draagvlak en bekendheid binnen de organisatie kunnen opleveren. De geïnterviewde studenten gaven daarnaast als tips om vaker langs de klassen te gaan, gadgets in te zetten, de vindbaarheid online te vergroten en in de fysieke locaties te verduidelijken bij wie de student terecht kan.
DOCUMENT
Abstract Aims: To identify crucial programme characteristics and group mechanisms of, and lessons learned from hindrances in an empowerment programme for certified nursing assistants and contribute to the development of similar programmes in other care settings. Design: Exploratory qualitative study. Methods: Between May 2017 and September 2020, we used in-depth interviews and participant observations to study four groups participating in an empowerment programme for certified nursing assistants (N = 44). Results: We identified three crucial empowerment-enhancing programme characteristics: (1) inviting participants to move outside their comfort zone of caregiving; (2) stimulating the use of untapped talents, competencies and interests; (3) supporting the rediscovery of participants' occupational role and worth. Crucial group mechanisms encompassed learning from and with each other, as well as mechanisms of self-correction and self-motivation. Hindrances included a perceived lack of direction, and a lack of organizational support and facilitation. Conclusion: We showed the significance of creating an inviting and stimulating environment in which participants can explore and function in ways they otherwise would not. Likewise, we identified how this can help participants learn from, critically correct and motivate one another. Impact: The programme under study was uniquely aimed to empower certified nursing assistants. Our insights on crucial programme characteristics and group mechanisms may benefit those who develop empowerment programmes, but also policymakers and managers in supporting certified nursing assistants and other nursing professions in empowerment endeavours. Such empowerment may enhance employee retention and make occupational members more likely to address challenges affecting their occupational group and the long-term care sector.
DOCUMENT
Abstract Aims: To identify crucial programme characteristics and group mechanisms of, and lessons learned from hindrances in an empowerment programme for certified nursing assistants and contribute to the development of similar programmes in other care settings. Design: Exploratory qualitative study. Methods: Between May 2017 and September 2020, we used in-depth interviews and participant observations to study four groups participating in an empowerment programme for certified nursing assistants (N = 44). Results: We identified three crucial empowerment-enhancing programme characteristics: (1) inviting participants to move outside their comfort zone of caregiving; (2) stimulating the use of untapped talents, competencies and interests; (3) supporting the rediscovery of participants' occupational role and worth. Crucial group mechanisms encompassed learning from and with each other, as well as mechanisms of selfcorrection and self-motivation. Hindrances included a perceived lack of direction, and a lack of organizational support and facilitation. Conclusion: We showed the significance of creating an inviting and stimulating environment in which participants can explore and function in ways they otherwise would not. Likewise, we identified how this can help participants learn from, critically correct and motivate one another. Impact: The programme under study was uniquely aimed to empower certified nursing assistants. Our insights on crucial programme characteristics and group mechanisms may benefit those who develop empowerment programmes, but also policymakers and managers in supporting certified nursing assistants and other nursing professions in empowerment endeavours. Such empowerment may enhance employee retention and make occupational members more likely to address challenges affecting their occupational group and the long-term care sector
DOCUMENT
Background: Acquiring the theoretical and practical knowhow of conducting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research is not part of the traditional curriculum of researchers. Zuyd University of Applied Sciences and Huis voor de Zorg, a regional umbrella patient organization, therefore started a 1.5-year coaching programme. Objective: To establish a community of practice by developing a PPI coaching programme for senior and junior health services researchers of Zuyd University. The context consisted of research projects conducted by the participants. Methods: A participatory action research methodology. Data were collected from reports of thematic group meetings and individual sessions with participants, field notes and regular reflection meetings with the project team. Data were analysed by reflexive deliberation. Findings: The programme comprised a kick-off meeting (52 attendees), followed by 7 group meetings with 11 junior and 9 senior researchers. The project team constructed a serious game based on the concept of the participation ladder. Questions and concerns differed for junior and senior researchers, and separate tailored meetings were organized for both groups. Between group meetings, participants received individual assignments. Group meetings were accompanied by individual coaching sessions to provide tailor-made feedback. The programme concluded with a combined meeting with all stakeholders. Conclusion: Building a community of PPI practice through action research facilitates the development of a coaching programme that fosters social learning, empowerment and the development of a shared identity concerning PPI. The role and responsibilities of senior researchers should be distinguished from those of junior researchers.
DOCUMENT
The first year of study is very exciting for many students. Everything is new: the school, your schedule, the teachers, and your fellow students. How can a university ensure a smooth transition for first-year students? For this, Inholland launched the Students for Students (S4S) project in the 2019-2020 academic year. In this project, second-year students (studentcoaches) support first-year students with their studies. They do this based on their own experience and the training they receive during their year as studentcoaches. Research shows that peer-mentoring is very successful in aiding first-year students through their first year of the study program. Peer-mentoring has the potential to increase well-being, social bonding, the feeling of belonging, and student resilience. It also ensures smoother academic integration, as peer-mentoring focuses on developing academic skills as well. Additionally, a studentcoach is often a low threshold point of contact for students where they can go with questions.
DOCUMENT
The artcle describes the outcomes of a pilot study on professional development of teachers. The project was initiated by the school management. Nine teachers volunteered to work on their professional development in a programme consisting of: meetings discussing on relevant teacher topics meetings discussing video fragments of own performances meetings exploring ways to coach each other and how to use videotapes for feedback peer-coaching-sessions in small groups. Within these groups three teachers took turns in different roles: trainee, coach and observer. Aims of the study are: to develop a coaching programme, to describe extensively the process and the outcomes in order to identify the main factors influencing the learning processes of teachers in peer coaching settings with video feedback.
LINK
The rising global demand for district nursing care necessitates effective strategies to support evidence-based decision-making. Despite the extensive development of nursing guidelines, adherence by district nursing teams remains suboptimal, revealing a gap between guideline development and daily practice. The Learning And Reflection for Nurses (LEARN) programme aims to bridge this gap by enhancing guideline use and fostering a learning attitude among district nursing teams. This protocol outlines the programme’s development, components and evaluation approach.
LINK
In the present study, the role of five categories of characteristics of a reciprocal peer coaching context was studied in relation to teacher learning. Both self-reports and student perceptions were used to measure teacher learning. Data were gathered on 28 secondary school teachers (14 coaching dyads). A mixed-method approach was adopted combining quantitative and qualitative data. To study the associations between five categories of characteristics of a peer coaching context (independent variable) and teacher learning (dependent variable), questionnaire results (quantitative data) and digital diaries (qualitative data) were examined. It was found that teachers learn when they are intrinsically motivated to take part in professional development programs; when they feel a certain pressure toward experimenting with new instructional methods; and when they are able to discuss their experiences within a safe, constructive, and trustworthy reciprocal peer coaching environment.
LINK
Background: The Nurses in the Lead (NitL) programme consists of a systematic approach and training to 1) empower community nurses in implementing evidence, targeted at encouraging functional activities of older adults, and 2) train community nurses in enabling team members to change their practice. This article aims to describe the process evaluation of NitL. Methods: A mixed-methods formative process evaluation with a predominantly qualitative approach was conducted. Qualitative data were collected by interviews with community nurses (n = 7), focus groups with team members (n = 31), and reviewing seven implementation plans and 28 patient records. Quantitative data were collected among community nurses and team members (N = 90) using a questionnaire to assess barriers in encouraging functional activities and attendance lists. Data analysis was carried out through descriptive statistics and content analysis. Results: NitL was largely executed according to plan. Points of attention were the use and value of the background theory within the training, completion of implementation plans, and reporting in patient records by community nurses. Inhibiting factors for showing leadership and encouraging functional activities were a lack of time and a high complexity of care; facilitating factors were structure and clear communication within teams. Nurses considered the systematic approach useful and the training educational for their role. Most team members considered NitL practical and were satisfied with the coaching provided by community nurses. To optimise NitL, community nurses recommended providing the training first and extending the training. The team members recommended continuing clinical lessons, which were an implementation strategy from the community nurses. Conclusions: NitL was largely executed as planned, and appears worthy of further application in community care practice. However, adaptations are recommended to make NitL more promising in practice in empowering community nurse leadership in implementing evidence.
DOCUMENT
There’s a lot to deal with when students start a new degree programme; for instance, familiarising with a new place and meeting lots of new people. The way students learn in higher education might also be different than what they are used to. Research group Study Success created tips for a great start in the first 100 days. These tips are based on the results of various studies conducted by the research group, but also on advice from current students who were asked for their input.
DOCUMENT
