BACKGROUND: Communicative participation is the primary outcome of speech and language therapy for people with communication disorders. However, there are no instruments that measure communicative participation from the perspective of adolescents and young adults. Moreover, little research has been conducted in which adolescents and young adults with various communication problems were asked about relevant participation situations in which they need to communicate. Before a new measurement instrument can be developed, it is necessary to explore adolescents' and young adults' views on their communicative participation.AIMS: In this study we identified situations in which adolescents and young adults experience barriers participating because of communication problems, as well as situations in which they have no difficulties. In addition, we identified aspects of these situations that influence communicative participation in order to gain a deeper understanding of concepts related to communicative participation.METHODS AND PROCEDURES: This concept elicitation study concerned in-depth interviews on self-experienced communicative participation, in which diaries were used as a sensitizing exercise. Participants were asked to keep a diary for 1-2 weeks in which they described their communicative participation during the day. They were asked to describe situations in which they were not able to participate because of their communication disorder, and to describe situations in which they were able to participate. Within 1 week after completing the diary, participants were invited for an in-depth interview, in which the content of the diary was discussed.OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Twelve participants were included in this study (7 females, 5 males; 13-27 years) with a variety of communication disorders, including language disorders, speech disorders, hearing loss, or a combination of them. They described a total of 234 situations related to different domains (e.g., communicative participation in school or with friends). Out of these situations, 37 concepts that influence communicative participation were found that were related to the six categories: person (e.g., strangers), topic (e.g., figurative language), pace (e.g., time pressure), location (e.g., school), moment (e.g., energy) and mode (e.g., group conversations).CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The results of the study provide understanding in adolescents' and young adults' perspectives on communicative participation. The identified situations form the basis for developing an item bank for measuring communicative participation in adolescents and young adults with communication disorders. In upcoming studies, the items will be extensively assessed on the quality aspects of comprehensiveness, comprehensibility and relevance.WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Communicative participation is the most important outcome of speech and language therapy. However, measurement instruments (preferably patient reported outcome measures, PROMs) to assess communicative participation of adolescents and young adults are scarce. Moreover, perspectives of adolescents and young adults on self-experienced communicative participation, which can lead to the development of a measurement instrument, have not yet been identified. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study is about the self-experienced communicative participation situations mentioned by adolescents and young adults themselves. It presents 37 concepts describing communicative participation that were identified from communicative participation situations mentioned by adolescents and young adults themselves. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This study provides more insight into concepts that describe communicative participation from the perspectives of adolescents and young adults. The results will be used to develop an item bank measuring communicative participation in the target population.
DOCUMENT
BackgroundVariations in communicative participation of children with developmental language disorder (DLD) cannot be wholly explained by their language difficulties alone and may be influenced by contextual factors. Contextual factors may support or hinder communicative participation in children, which makes their identification clinically relevant.AimsTo investigate which contextual (environmental and personal) factors in early childhood are protective, risk or neutral factors for communicative participation among school-aged children with DLD, and to identify possible gaps in knowledge about this subject.Methods & ProceduresA scoping review was conducted based on a systematic search of studies published from January 2007 to March 2022 in Pubmed, Embase (without MEDLINE), CINAHL and PsycINFO. In total, 8802 studies were reviewed using predefined eligibility criteria, of which 32 studies were included for data extraction and critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2021) tools.Main ContributionThe methodological quality of included studies was adequate to strong. Personal protective factors identified are being a preschool girl, reaching school age and being prosocial, while personal risk factors are becoming a teenager or adolescent, having low socio-cognitive skills and experiencing comorbid mobility impairment or behavioural problems. Gender after the preschool years and non-verbal abilities were not found to be of influence, and the role of socio-emotional skills is inconclusive. Receiving therapy is an environmental protective factor, while the association between socio-economical family characteristics with communicative participation is inconclusive.Conclusions & ImplicationsLimited research has been conducted on which risk and protective factors present in early childhood are associated with later communicative participation of children with DLD. The influence of co-occurring health conditions, social background variables, individual psychological assets, interpersonal relationships and attitudes of other people represent knowledge gaps. In addition, knowledge about the comparative effectiveness of different types of interventions and service delivery models, and the impact of administrative control, organizational mechanisms and standards established by governments on children's communicative participation is lacking. More longitudinal research is needed focusing on the identification of relevant personal and environmental factors and the interactions between them in relation to communicative participation outcomes.
DOCUMENT
Purpose: This study aims to systematically identify items that measure comnicative participation from measurement instruments that measure (aspects communication and/or participation in children and adolescents (5–18 years with communication disorders, for developing an item bank. Method: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE Embase to search for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) or pareports measuring aspects of communication and/or participation in childand adolescents. The individual items of the included measurement instrumwere reviewed on whether they measure communicative participation. The itwere then classified into one of the International Classification of FunctioDisability and Health (ICF) for Children and Youth (World Health Organiza2007) domains of activities and participation. Results: A total of 29 instruments were found, nine PROMs and 20 preports. One hundred forty-five items were identified that measure communtive participation. From these 145 items, 74 were retrieved from PROMs (5and 71 were retrieved from parent reports (49%). The majority of items classified in ICF Domain 7, interpersonal interactions and relationships (73.8followed by Domain 8, major life areas (13.8%), and Domain 9, commsocial, and civic life (8.3%). Only a few items were found in Domains 5 and none was found in Domains 1, 2, and 4. Conclusions: We identified 145 items potentially useful for developing an bank addressing communicative participation in children and adolescents communication disorders. However, item development in collaboration with target population is needed to ensure that these items fully reflect the const.
DOCUMENT
Bij spraak-, taal-, stem- en gehoorproblemen wordt communiceren lastig. Dat heeft grote gevolgen voor de participatie van de persoon. In dit promotieonderzoek ontwikkelen we een instrument gericht op het meten van communicatieve participatie bij volwassenen met verschillende communicatieve problemen, die ook toegankelijk is voor mensen met afasie.
Bij afasie is spreken en begrijpen van taal lastig. Dat heeft grote gevolgen voor de participatie van de patiënt. In dit promotieonderzoek ontwikkelen we een meetinstrument gericht op communicatieve participatie van mensen met afasie.Doel Er zijn in Nederland geen bruikbare instrumenten om communicatieve participatie van mensen met afasie in kaart te brengen. Dit onderzoek heeft tot doel om zo'n instrument te ontwikkelen. We vertalen een itembank gericht op de communicatieve participatie bij mensen met afasie na niet aangeboren hersenletsel (NAH) en we ontwikkelen deze tot een betrouwbaar en valide meetinstrument. Resultaten Dit onderzoek loopt nog. Na afloop vind je hier de resultaten. Looptijd 01 september 2019 - 31 augustus 2023 Aanpak We vertalen de Communicative Participation Item Bank en ontwikkelen deze door. We gebruiken daarbij de methodologie van het internationale meetsysteem voor patiëntuitkomsten PROMIS. We maken de itembank afasievriendelijk op basis van criteria uit de literatuur. We onderzoeken alle klinimetrische meeteigenschappen volgens de COSMIN-methodologie.
