De implementatie van zowel evidence-based behandelingen als het evidence-based gedachtegoed verloopt vaak moeizaam. Om het primaire proces te veranderen wordt veel inspanning gericht op de professional. Dat blijkt niet voldoende te zijn. Is die professional zo onwillig? Nee, de professional handelt in een context die minstens zo belangrijk is in implementatieprocessen. Het implementeren van evidence-based practice (EBP) valt nog niet mee. Er is veel geschreven over de kloof tussen praktijk en wetenschap en over het beperkte gebruik van wetenschappelijke kennis door verpleegkundigen. Verpleegkundigen gebruiken de kennis die ze in hun mbo- of hbo-opleiding hebben geleerd. Als ze in de praktijk tegen een probleem of kennistekort aanlopen, vragen ze eerder een collega dan te rade te gaan bij de wetenschappelijke literatuur. Ook als het gaat om concrete interventies of handelingen zijn tradities zeer sterk. Zelfs als er stevige implementatieprojecten worden ingezet, lijkt het niet altijd te lukken. Het resultaat van een serie goed begeleide doorbraakprojecten in de geestelijke gezondheidszorg bleek bijvoorbeeld zeer teleurstellend.
LINK
Using socio-scientific issues as a learning context is an effective approach to achieve an important goal in science education, which is to enhance scientific literacy. It involves strengthening skills such as argumentation while also improving an understanding of the Nature of Science and imparting content knowledge. The present study evaluates the impact of a web-based educational instrument consisting of a unique combination of features designed to promote students’ development of skills and knowledge as well as to address the challenges faced by teachers in teaching socio-scientific issues. Participants included 423 students in secondary education. Students in the experimental condition received a three-lesson intervention with the educational instrument, and students in the control condition followed their regular science lessons. Findings indicated that the instrument proves effective in fostering learning outcomes while teachers benefit from the shift of managing classroom discussion to individual guidance of students. Applying the educational instrument in the classroom demonstrates promise in improving student engagement and their comprehension of socio-scientific issues.
In the decision-making environment of evidence-based practice, the following three sources of information must be integrated: research evidence of the intervention, clinical expertise, and the patient’s values. In reality, evidence-based practice usually focuses on research evidence (which may be translated into clinical practice guidelines) and clinical expertise without considering the individual patient’s values. The shared decision-making model seems to be helpful in the integration of the individual patient’s values in evidence-based practice. We aim to discuss the relevance of shared decision making in chronic care and to suggest how it can be integrated with evidence-based practice in nursing. We start by describing the following three possible approaches to guide the decision-making process: the paternalistic approach, the informed approach, and the shared decision-making approach. Implementation of shared decision making has gained considerable interest in cases lacking a strong best-treatment recommendation, and when the available treatment options are equivalent to some extent. We discuss that in chronic care it is important to always invite the patient to participate in the decision-making process. We delineate the following six attributes of health care interventions in chronic care that influence the degree of shared decision making: the level of research evidence, the number of available intervention options, the burden of side effects, the impact on lifestyle, the patient group values, and the impact on resources. Furthermore, the patient’s willingness to participate in shared decision making, the clinical expertise of the nurse, and the context in which the decision making takes place affect the shared decision-making process. A knowledgeable and skilled nurse with a positive attitude towards shared decision making – integrated with evidence-based practice – can facilitate the shared decision-making process. We conclude that nurses as well as other health care professionals in chronic care should integrate shared decision making with evidence- based practice to deliver patient-centred care.
