Een advies voor gezonde en duurzame voeding zou gebaseerd moeten zijn op voordelen voor de mens, de aarde en de economie; people, planet, profit. Voor de mens zou een als goed ervaren gezondheid al voldoende kunnen zijn. Voor de aarde lijkt het beter om te streven naar een zo laag mogelijk zorggebruik. Resultaten uit verschillende onderzoeken lijken uit te wijzen dat oervoeding, bestaande uit groente, fruit, vlees, vis, eieren en noten, de beste keus zou kunnen zijn voor mensen met een verhoogd risico op diabetes type 2 en hart- en vaatziekten. Resultaten uit een kleine haalbaarheidsstudie lijken dezelfde kant op te wijzen als het gaat om ervaren gezondheid. In dit lectoraat wil ik verder onderzoek doen naar de gezondheidsvoordelen van oervoeding.
MULTIFILE
BACKGROUNDThis systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the additional effects of exercise to hypocaloric diet on body weight, body composition, glycaemic control, and cardio-respiratory fitness in adults with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes.METHODSEmbase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central databases were evaluated and 11 studies were included. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed on body weight and measures of body composition and glycaemic control, to compare the effect of hypocaloric diet plus exercise with hypocaloric diet alone.RESULTSExercise interventions consisted of walking or jogging, cycle ergometer training, football training, or resistance training, and duration varied from 2 to 52!weeks. Body weight and measures of body composition and glycemic control decreased during both the combined intervention and hypocaloric diet alone. Mean difference in change of body weight (0.77 kg [95% CI: 2.03; 0.50]), BMI (0.34 kg/m2 [95% CI 0.73; 0.05]), waist circumference (1.42 cm [95% CI: 3.84; 1.00]), fat-free mass (0.18 kg [95% CI 0.52; 0.17]), fat mass (1.61 kg [95% CI 4.42; 1.19]), fasting glucose (+0.14 mmol/l [95% CI 0.02; 0.30]), HbA1c (0.06 % [95% CI 0.25; 0.13]), and HOMA-IR (+0.01 [95% CI: 0.40; 0.42]) was not statistically different between the combined intervention and hypocaloric diet alone. Two studies reported VO2max and showed significant increases upon addition of exercise to hypocaloric diet.CONCLUSIONAdditional effects of exercise to hypocaloric diet in adults with overweight or obesity and type 2 diabetes were not shown for body weight, body composition, or glycaemic control, while cardio-respiratory fitness improves.
MULTIFILE
The metabolic syndrome (MetS) comprises cardiometabolic risk factors frequently found in individuals with obesity. Guidelines to prevent or reverse MetS suggest limiting fat intake, however, lowering carbohydrate intake has gained attention too. The aim for this review was to determine to what extent either weight loss, reduction in caloric intake, or changes in macronutrient intake contribute to improvement in markers of MetS in persons with obesity without cardiometabolic disease. A meta-analysis was performed across a spectrum of studies applying low-carbohydrate (LC) and low-fat (LF) diets. PubMed searches yielded 17 articles describing 12 separate intervention studies assessing changes in MetS markers of persons with obesity assigned to LC (<40% energy from carbohydrates) or LF (<30% energy from fat) diets. Both diets could lead to weight loss and improve markers of MetS. Meta-regression revealed that weight loss most efficaciously reduced fasting glucose levels independent of macronutrient intake at the end of the study. Actual carbohydrate intake and actual fat intake at the end of the study, but not the percent changes in intake of these macronutrients, improved diastolic blood pressure and circulating triglyceride levels, without an effect of weight loss. The homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance improved with both diets, whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol only improved in the LC diet, both irrespective of aforementioned factors. Remarkably, changes in caloric intake did not play a primary role in altering MetS markers. Taken together, these data suggest that, beyond the general effects of the LC and LF diet categories to improve MetS markers, there are also specific roles for weight loss, LC and HF intake, but not reduced caloric intake, that improve markers of MetS irrespective of diet categorization. On the basis of the results from this meta-analysis, guidelines to prevent MetS may need to be re-evaluated.
MULTIFILE
