Abstract Objective: To describe changes in the health service delivery process experienced by professionals, patients and informal caregivers during implementation of a national programme to improve quality of care of geriatric rehabilitation by improving integration of health service delivery processes. Study setting: Sixteen skilled nursing facilities. Study design: Prospective study, comparing three consecutive cohorts. Data collection: Professionals (elderly care physicians, physiotherapists and nursing staff) rated four domains of health service delivery at admission and at discharge of 1075 patients. In addition, these patients [median age 79 (Interquartile range 71–85) years, 63% females] and their informal caregivers rated their experiences on these domains 4 weeks after discharge. Principal findings: During the three consecutive cohorts, professionals reported improvement on the domain team cooperation, including assessment for intensive treatment and information transfer among professionals. Fewer improvements were reported within the domains alignment with patients’ needs, care coordination and care quality. Between the cohorts, according to patients (n = 521) and informal caregivers (n = 319) there were no changes in the four domains of health service delivery. Conclusion: This national programme resulted in small improvements in team cooperation as reported by the professionals. No effects were found on patients’ and informal caregivers’ perceptions of health service delivery.
DOCUMENT
Key summary points Aim To reach consensus on terminology, organisational aspects, and outcome domains of geriatric rehabilitation for older people living at home. Findings In three rounds, an international panel reached a consensus regarding the term “home-based geriatric rehabilitation” to distinguish it from inpatient rehabilitation. The panel also identifed key organisational aspects essential for its implementation and concluded that participation and activity are the primary outcome domains to focus on. Message The results of this International Delphi shows consensus of experts on various topics in home-based GR, which is important to further develop international collaboration, development and research on this topic. Abstract Purpose Internationally, many diferences are observed regarding the practice of geriatric rehabilitation for older people living at home. To improve international collaboration and research on this topic, we aimed to reach a consensus on terminology, organisational aspects, and outcome domains to focus on. Methods We conducted a three-round online Delphi study among 60 (Home-based) geriatric rehabilitation experts from 14 countries. In the frst round, we collected diverse perspectives and input through statements and questions. In the subsequent rounds, participants rated statements on a 5-point Likert scale. Each statement could be accompanied by written feedback. After each round, results were presented anonymously to the participants, and statements on which no consensus was reached were rephrased. Consensus was defned as 70% or more participants (fully) agreeing with a statement. Results Sixty, 52, and 46 experts completed rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively. After two rounds, we reached a consensus on ten statements and on the remaining four in the last round. A consensus was reached on the terminology used (i.e., home-based geriatric rehabilitation) and on several organisational aspects (e.g., essential aspects to consider for starting home-based geriatric rehabilitation and the importance of a knowledgeable case manager). Lastly, experts agreed that participation and activity are the most important outcome domains to focus on. Conclusions Through an international Delphi study, we reached consensus on various important aspects of home-based geriatric rehabilitation. These outcomes provide a basis for further development of this emerging feld.
DOCUMENT
BackgroundThere is a shift from inpatient to home-based geriatric rehabilitation (HBGR), and potential benefits are demonstrated. Previously, a theoretical HBGR model, version 1.0, has been developed, outlining its essential components. However, clear guidance on the practical design and organisation of HBGR in everyday practice is still lacking. Therefore, determining the optimal design for this complex intervention is essential for its successful implementation in daily practice. The objective of this study is to redesign the theoretical HBGR trajectory and assess its feasibility, acceptability, and usability from both patient and professional perspectives.MethodsA redesign and feasibility study based on the MRC framework was conducted in a Dutch skilled nursing facility using the MRC framework in co-creation with eleven healthcare professionals and four patient representatives. The HBGR trajectory 1.0, comprises four building blocks (structure, process, environment, and outcomes) based on the Post-Acute-Care rehabilitation quality framework. Version 1.0 was redesigned during the development phase and subsequently pilot-tested in daily practice during the feasibility phase. Adjustments were made based on semi-structured interviews with ten patients and (interim) evaluations.ResultsThe HBGR trajectory 1.0 has been redesigned into version 2.0. It contains eleven elements: individualised goal setting, providing HBGR is the default unless otherwise indicated, an information letter, blended eHealth, mapping the patient’s living environment, stimulation support from informal caregivers, collaboration with community care nursing, rehabilitation coordination, central planning, therapy at home, and online multidisciplinary evaluation. Version 2.0 was enthusiastically endorsed by patients, patient representatives, and professionals, who found it feasible, acceptable, and usable in daily practice.ConclusionThe HBGR trajectory 1.0 was adapted, tested, and finally redesigned into version 2.0. The study revealed that involving patients, their representatives, and healthcare professionals was critical to garnering support and facilitating implementation. Key developments align with global trends and include the successful integration of eHealth with traditional treatment methods, enhanced collaboration and knowledge sharing among community care nurses, and increased involvement of informal caregivers in rehabilitation. This redesigned HBGR trajectory is ready for evaluation and implementation in follow-up effectiveness research.
MULTIFILE
