Objective: Dialysis patients frequently report a change of taste that is reversible after renal transplantation, suggesting that uremic toxins may negatively influence taste. Currently, frequent nocturnal home hemodialysis (NHHD) is the most effective method of hemodialysis, and is associated with the lowest levels of uremic toxins. We studied preferences for various foods as an indicator of taste perception. We questioned whether food preference differs between NHHD patients and those on conventional hemodialysis. Design and Patients: In this transverse, cross-sectional pilot study, we assessed food preference by means of a questionnaire for patients on NHHD (n = 6; 8 hours of dialysis per night, for 5 or 6 nights a week) and 3 age-matched and sex-matched control groups: chronic home hemodialysis patients (HHD; n = 9; 4 to 5 hours of dialysis per day, 3 days a week), chronic in-center hemodialysis patients (CHD; n = 18; 4 to 5 hours of dialysis per day, 3 days a week), and healthy control subjects (HC; n = 23). Results: Mean scores for food preference did not differ between groups (P = .32). Similarly, the preference for product groups did not differ between groups. On an individual product level, we found only minor differences. The NHHD patients had a preference for savory snacks, as did the HC and CHD groups, whereas the HHD group had a preference for sweet snacks (P < .05). Hemodialysis patients reported dry mouth more often than did the HC patients (P < .05). Conclusions: Frequent NHHD has no major impact on food preference. The change in taste reported by NHHD patients is not related to their particular food preferences. © 2010 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
DOCUMENT
This planned sub-study was part of a prospective intervention study in patients on hemodialysis with a high serum phosphate concentration and high PBM pill burden. Functional, communicative, and critical medication-related HL were assessed using the Recognizing and Addressing Limited Pharmaceutical Literacy interview guide, and self-reported PBM adherence was evaluated using the MARS-5 (Medication Adherence Report Scale-5) questionnaire. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients who perceived difficulties in ≥ 1 HL domain, secondary outcome was the prevalence of perceived difficulties within the HL domains. Exploratory outcome was the association between medication-related HL and self-reported adherence to PBM. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Covariates for logistic regression were age, gender, number of medications, and PBM and total pill burden.
MULTIFILE
BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis patients experience an elevated risk of malnutrition associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD) results in more effective removal of waste products and fluids. Therefore, diet and fluid restrictions are less restricted in NHD patients. However, it is ambiguous whether transition from conventional hemodialysis (CHD) to NHD leads to improved intake and nutritional status. We studied the effect of NHD on protein intake, laboratory indices of nutritional status, and body composition.STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis.POPULATION: NHD patients.SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic literature search from databases, Medline, Cinahl, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library, to identify studies reporting on nutritional status post-transition from CHD to NHD.INTERVENTION: Transition from CHD to NHD.OUTCOMES: Albumin, normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR), dry body weight (DBW), body mass index (BMI), phase angle, protein intake, and energy intake.RESULTS: Systematic literature search revealed 13 studies comprising 282 patients that made the transition from CHD to NHD. Meta-analysis included nine studies in 229 patients. In control group controlled studies (n = 4), serum albumin increased significantly from baseline to 4-6 months in NHD patients compared with patients that remained on CHD (mean difference 1.3 g/l, 95% CI 0.02; 2.58, p = 0.05). In baseline controlled studies, from baseline to 4-6 months of NHD treatment, significant increases were ascertained in serum albumin (mean difference (MD) 1.63 g/l, 95% CI 0.73-2.53, p<0.001); nPCR (MD 0.16 g/kg/day; 95% CI 0.04-0.29, p = 0.01); protein intake (MD 18.9 g, 95% CI 9.7-28.2, p<0.001); and energy intake (MD 183.2 kcal, 95% CI 16.8-349.7, p = 0.03). Homogeneity was rejected only for nPCR (baseline versus 4-6 months). DBW, BMI, and phase angle did not significantly change. Similar results were obtained for comparison between baseline and 8-12 months of NHD treatment.LIMITATIONS: Most studies had moderate sample sizes; some had incomplete dietary records and relatively brief follow-up period. Studies markedly differed with regard to study design.CONCLUSIONS: NHD is associated with significantly higher protein and energy intake as well as increases in serum albumin and nPCR. However, the data on body composition are inconclusive.
DOCUMENT
End-stage kidney disease patients treated with conventional hemodialysis (CHD) are known to have impaired physical performance and protein-energy wasting (PEW). Nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD) was shown to improve clinical outcomes, but the evidence is limited on physical performance and PEW. We investigate whether NHD improves physical performance and PEW. This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized cohort study compared patients who changed from CHD (2-4 times/week 3-5 h) to NHD (2-3 times/week 7-8 h), with patients who continued CHD. The primary outcome was physical performance at 3, 6 and 12 months, assessed with the short physical performance battery (SPPB). Secondary outcomes were a 6-minute walk test (6MWT), physical activity monitor, handgrip muscle strength, KDQOL-SF physical component score (PCS) and LAPAQ physical activity questionnaire. PEW was assessed with a dietary record, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy and subjective global assessment (SGA). Linear mixed models were used to analyze the differences between groups. This study included 33 patients on CHD and 32 who converted to NHD (mean age 55 ± 15.3). No significant difference was found in the SPPB after 1-year of NHD compared to CHD (+0.24, [95% confidence interval -0.51 to 0.99], p = 0.53). Scores of 6MWT, PCS and SGA improved (+54.3 [95%CI 7.78 to 100.8], p = 0.02; +5.61 [-0.51 to 10.7], p = 0.03; +0.71 [0.36 to 1.05], p &lt; 0.001; resp.) in NHD patients, no changes were found in other parameters. We conclude that NHD patients did not experience an improved SPPB score compared to CHD patients; they did obtain an improved walking distance and self-reported PCS as well as SGA after 1-year of NHD, which might be related to the younger age of these patients.
DOCUMENT
Background: Malnutrition is an important cause of the excessive morbidity and mortality rate of dialysis patients. Frequent nocturnal home hemodialysis (NHHD) has many benefits compared with conventional thrice-weekly hemodialysis (CHD), due to the virtual absence of dietary restrictions and a much higher overall dialysis efficiency. In this observational study, we investigated whether these benefits of NHHD translate into an improved nutritional intake, with a special emphasis on protein intake. Methods: We prospectively assessed the effect of the transition of CHD to NHHD on nutritional intake (5-day dietary intake journal), normalized protein catabolic rate, and anthropometric parameters in 15 consecutive patients who started NHHD in our center between 2004 and 2009 and completed at least 8 months of follow-up. Data were collected before the transition from CHD to NHHD and 4 and 8 months after the transition. Results: Protein intake, as measured by both dietary intake journal and normalized protein catabolic rate, increased significantly after the transition from CHD to NHHD. Accordingly, phosphate intake increased significantly; however, serum phosphate levels did not increase, despite negligible phosphate binder use during NHHD. Body mass index and upper arm muscle circumference did not change significantly. Conclusion: The transition from CHD to NHHD has a positive effect on nutritional intake, in particular, protein intake. NHHD should be considered in malnourished patients on CHD. © 2012 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
DOCUMENT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sufficient protein intake is of great importance in hemodialysis (HD) patients, especially for maintaining muscle mass. Daily protein needs are generally estimated using bodyweight (BW), in which individual differences in body composition are not accounted for. As body protein mass is best represented by fat free mass (FFM), there is a rationale to apply FFM instead of BW. The agreement between both estimations is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare protein needs based on either FFM or BW in HD patients.METHODS: Protein needs were estimated in 115 HD patients by three different equations; FFM, BW and BW adjusted for low or high BMI. FFM was measured by multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy and considered the reference method. Estimations of FFM x 1.5 g/kg and FFM x 1.9 g/kg were compared with (adjusted)BW x 1.2 and x 1.5, respectively. Differences were assessed with repeated measures ANOVA and Bland-Altman plots.RESULTS: Mean protein needs estimated by (adjusted)BW were higher compared to those based on FFM, across all BMI categories (P < 0.01) and most explicitly in obese patients. In females with BMI >30, protein needs were 69 ± 17.4 g/day higher based on BW and 45 ± 9.3 g/day higher based on BMI adjusted BW, compared to FFM. In males with BMI >30, protein needs were 51 ± 20.4 g/day and 23 ± 20.9 g/day higher compared to FFM, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Our data show large differences and possible overestimations of protein needs when comparing BW to FFM. We emphasize the importance of more research and discussion on this topic.
DOCUMENT
Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is considered to be a frequent complication of hemodialysis (HD) and is associated with symptom burden, increased incidence of access failure, cardiovascular events, and higher mortality. This systematic literature review aims to analyse studies that investigated the prevalence of IDH. A complicating factor herein is that many different definitions of IDH are used in literature.Methods: A systematic literature search from databases, Medline, Cinahl, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library to identify studies reporting on the actual prevalence of IDH was conducted. Studies were categorized by the type of definition used for the prevalence of IDH. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of IDH was performed.Results: In a meta-analysis comprising 4 studies including 1,694 patients and 4 studies including 13,189 patients, the prevalence of HD sessions complicated by IDH was 10.1 and 11.6% for the European Best Practice Guideline (EBPG) definition and the Nadir <90 definition, respectively. The proportion of patients with frequent IDH could not reliably be established because of the wide range in cutoff values that were used to identify patients with frequent IDH. There was a large variety in the prevalence of symptoms and interventions. Major risk factors associated with IDH across studies were diabetes, a higher interdialytic weight gain, female gender, and lower body weight.Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggests that the prevalence of IDH is lower than 12% for both the EBPG and the Nadir <90 definition which is much lower than stated in most reviews.
LINK
Beschrijving hoe volwassenen die gedialyseerd worden fietsen tijdens hun dialyse ervaren, zodat potentiële bevorderende en belemmerende factoren konden worden geïdentificeerd.
LINK
DOCUMENT
Background: Due to the globally increasing demand for care, innovation is important to maintain quality, safety, effectiveness, patient sensitivity, and outcome orientation. Health care technologies could be a solution to innovate, maintain, or improve the quality of care and simultaneously decrease nurses’ workload. Currently, nurses are rarely involved in the design of health care technologies, mostly due to time constraints with clinical nursing responsibilities and limited exposure to technology and design disciplines. To ensure that health care technologies fit into nurses’ core and routine practice, nurses should be actively involved in the design process. Objective: The aim of the present study was to explore the main requirements for nurses’ active participation in the design of health care technologies. Design: An exploratory descriptive qualitative design was used which helps to both understand and describe a phenomenon. Participants: Twelve nurses from three academic hospitals in the Netherlands participated in this study. Method: Data were collected from semistructured interviews with hospital nurses experienced in design programs and thematically analysed. Results: Four themes were identified concerning the main requirements for nurses to participate in the design of health care technologies: (1) nurses’ motivations to participate, (2) the process of technology development, (3) required competence to participate (such as assertiveness, creative thinking, problem solving skills), and (4) facilitating and organizing nurses’ participation. Conclusion: Nurses experience their involvement in the design process as essential, distinctive, and meaningful but experience few possibilities to combine this work with their current workload, flows, routines, and requirements. To participate in the design of health care technologies nurses need motivation and specific competencies. Organizations should facilitate time for nurses to acquire the required competencies and to be intentionally involved in technology design and development activities.
DOCUMENT
