PurposePalliative care improves quality of life of patients and relatives facing life-threatening illnesses; it places their needs central (WHO, 2015). It is however unknown if facility design in Dutch hospice care facilities fulfils these needs. This paper aims to establish if services and spaces of hospice care providers match with needs of users.DesignThis explorative study includes a literature review on needs and supporting services and spaces, using evidence-based design and indoor-environment design literature. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with caregivers and support staff.FindingsPatients in the final stages of life need a last refuge that requires a higher standard when compared to regular healthcare environments. The spaces and service delivery processes at hospices seem to be optimal while in other (hospice) care settings users miss adequate spaces and services. In addition, management in care systems needs to reconfigure accordingly in order to offer flexible customisation e.g. allocation of staff. Several space and service requirements have been identified, like domesticity, lay-out, style of décor, space for loved ones, quiet, and personal artefacts.Practical implicationsThe research findings will be used for follow-up research that will result in aligning the designs of spaces and services with needs of hospice care users.Originality/ValueThe role of facility management in palliative care has rarely been studied. Current findings may be regarded as a starting point for further investigation in this area, allowing hospice care to improve its spaces and services in order to meet patients’ and relatives’ needs.
DOCUMENT
Abstract Background In the Netherlands, palliative care is provided by generalist healthcare professionals (HCPs) if possible and by palliative care specialists if necessary. However, it still needs to be clarifed what specialist expertise entails, what specialized care consists of, and which training or work experience is needed to become a palliative care special‑ist. In addition to generalists and specialists, ‘experts’ in palliative care are recognized within the nursing and medical professions, but it is unclear how these three roles relate. This study aims to explore how HCPs working in palliative care describe themselves in terms of generalist, specialist, and expert and how this self-description is related to their work experience and education. Methods A cross-sectional open online survey with both pre-structured and open-ended questions among HCPs who provide palliative care. Analyses were done using descriptive statistics and by deductive thematic coding of open-ended questions. Results Eight hundred ffty-four HCPs flled out the survey; 74% received additional training, and 79% had more than fve years of working experience in palliative care. Based on working experience, 17% describe themselves as a generalist, 34% as a specialist, and 44% as an expert. Almost three out of four HCPs attributed their level of expertise on both their education and their working experience. Self-described specialists/experts had more working experience in palliative care, often had additional training, attended to more patients with palliative care needs, and were more often physicians as compared to generalists. A deductive analysis of the open questions revealed the similarities and dis‑ tinctions between the roles of a specialist and an expert. Seventy-six percent of the respondents mentioned the impor‑tance of having both specialists and experts and wished more clarity about what defnes a specialist or an expert, how to become one, and when you need them. In practice, both roles were used interchangeably. Competencies for the specialist/expert role consist of consulting, leadership, and understanding the importance of collaboration. Conclusions Although the grounds on which HCPs describe themselves as generalist, specialist, or experts difer, HCPs who describe themselves as specialists or experts mostly do so based on both their post-graduate education and their work experience. HCPs fnd it important to have specialists and experts in palliative care in addition to gen‑eralists and indicate more clarity about (the requirements for) these three roles is needed.
DOCUMENT
Background: Increasing attention to palliative care for the general population has led to the development of various evidence-based or consensus-based tools and interventions. However, specific tools and interventions are needed for people with severe mental illness (SMI) who have a life-threatening illness. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the scientific evidence on tools and interventions in palliative care for this group. Methods: Systematic searches were done in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Embase databases, supplemented by reference tracking, searches on the internet with free text terms, and consultations with experts to identify relevant literature. Empirical studies with qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods designs concerning tools and interventions for use in palliative care for people with SMI were included. Methodological quality was assessed using a critical appraisal instrument for heterogeneous study designs. Stepwise study selection and the assessment of methodological quality were done independently by two review authors. Results: Four studies were included, reporting on a total of two tools and one multi-component intervention. One study concerned a tool to identify the palliative phase in patients with SMI. This tool appeared to be usable only in people with SMI with a cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, two related studies focused on a tool to involve people with SMI in discussions about medical decisions at the end of life. This tool was assessed as feasible and usable in the target group. One other study concerned the Dutch national Care Standard for palliative care, including a multicomponent intervention. The Palliative Care Standard also appeared to be feasible and usable in a mental healthcare setting, but required further tailoring to suit this specific setting. None of the included studies investigated the effects of the tools and interventions on quality of life or quality of care. Conclusions: Studies of palliative care tools and interventions for people with SMI are scarce. The existent tools and intervention need further development and should be tailored to the care needs and settings of these people. Further research is needed on the feasibility, usability and effects of tools and interventions for palliative care for people with SMI.
DOCUMENT
In de palliatieve terminale zorg is men nog erg terughoudend in de toepassing van telehealth technologie, terwijl voorgaande studies wel de potentiele meerwaarde ervan hebben aangetoond. In deze postdoc aanvraag zal daarom nader onderzoek worden gedaan naar de acceptatie van telehealth in de palliatieve terminale zorg. Het doel van het onderzoek is inzichtelijk maken hoe telehealth ingezet zou moeten worden in de palliatieve terminale zorg opdat het van meerwaarde is in het ondersteunen van; 1) de uitwisseling van informatie tussen zorgvragers en zorgverleners, en 2) de sociale interactie van zorgvragers met familie en naasten. De thematiek van het onderzoek sluit aan bij de onderzoekslijn Technology in Society van het lectoraat Technology, Health & Care. Het lectoraat opereert vanuit de pijler Health & Wellbeing dat onderdeel vormt van de corporate onderzoeksagenda van Saxion getiteld Living Technology'. De postdoc zal onder supervisie van de lector het onderzoek nader gaan uitwerken en uitvoeren. Daarbij zal ook nauwe samenwerking worden gezocht met studenten en de praktijk. Tevens zal de postdoc onderdeel uitmaken van een onderwijsteam opdat vervlechting van onderzoek en onderwijs goed tot stand gaat komen. In grote lijnen zal het onderzoek bestaan uit een literatuurstudie en een studie in de praktijk naar het gebruik en ervaringen van telehealth in de palliatieve terminale zorg. Vervolgens zal nader onderzoek zich richten op het ontwerp van een testopstelling voor de toepassing van telehealth in de praktijk van palliatieve terminale zorg. De postdoc zal zorgdragen dat studentopdrachten worden uitgezet bij diverse opleidingen opdat studenten kennis maken met het doen van onderzoek, en dat inspirerende colleges worden ontwikkeld, ingebed en verzorgd in diverse curricula. Daar waar mogelijk gaan studenten en docenten van verschillende opleidingen samenwerken om de gewenste interdisciplinariteit vorm te geven. Tot slot zal de postdoc in het kader van professionalisering zorgdragen voor kennisoverdracht naar docenten.
