Verifying information is one of the core activities of journalism. However, recent research shows that many stories derive from unchecked information from news agencies and PR material. That being said, reporters who do not use this pre-packaged material, but who instead produce original stories based on independent research, might be journalists who stay devoted to the verification of information. Therefore, this study focuses on in-depth stories that originated inside the newsroom. We expected that these kinds of stories would be checked and double-checked, because time constraints are less important and these stories are characteristic of independent, quality journalism. Contrary to this expectation, the results show that even these kinds of stories are not always vetted. The lack of time was seldom mentioned as an excuse. Our research points to avoidance mechanisms which inhibit journalists from verifying their information.
With the rise of innovation and entrepreneurship as avenues for journalists to take in their search for journalistic work, we need to critically interrogate how these terms are understood. Various journalism institutions are pushing a particular understanding of journalism, and of what constitutes meaningful and innovative journalism. In this paper, we review the literature on these themes and draw on experimental research done by one of the authors to argue for a more process-oriented approach to journalistic innovation and entrepreneurship. As a researcher-maker, one of the authors created an innovative journalistic project and tried to develop a business model for this project. She participated in an accelerator process organised by one of the main funds aimed at journalism innovation in the Netherlands. We show that one existing, and prevalent, understanding of innovation in journalism is one that is linear, rational and outcome-oriented. We challenge this understanding and draw on process-oriented theories of innovation to introduce the concepts of effectuation, improvisation and becoming as new lenses to reconsider these phenomena. These concepts provide clearer insight into the passionate and improvisational nature of doing innovative journalistic work.
Worden echte journalisten overbodig? Kunnen hun taken niet net zo goed vervuld worden door bloggers of lezers die usergenerated content aanleveren: tekst, filmpjes, fotos iedereen loopt immers met een volledig uitgeruste smartphone rond? We hebben toch 16 miljoen reporters volgens Skoeps (2008) en iedereen is toch journalist (Deuze, 2006)? Daarnaast maken media gebruik van wat onnozele gebruikers achterlaten op Facebook, Hyves of MySpace. Er is zoveel nieuws dat je alleen maar iemand nodig hebt om te knippen en te plakken: cut n paste journalism. Dat nieuws duikt overal op, Britney Spears en Paris Hilton vinden we net zo makkelijk bij nrc.nl als bij nu.nl, een website waar de journalisten alle vier zich uitsluitend bezighouden met het online zetten van nieuws van anderen: shovelware. De traditionele journalistieke poortwachter die op basis van strenge criteria selecteert, kan vervangen worden door de administratieve gatewatcher.
