Citizen participation in local renewable energy projects is often promoted as many suppose it to be a panacea for the difficulties that are involved in the energy transition process. Quite evidently, it is not; there is a wide variety of visions, ideologies and interests related to an ‘energy transition’. Such a variety is actually a precondition for a stakeholder participation process, as stakeholder participation only makes sense if there is ‘something at stake’. Conflicting viewpoints, interests and debates are the essence of participation. The success of stakeholder participation implies that these differences are acknowledged, and discussed, and that this has created mutual understanding among stakeholders. It does not necessarily create ‘acceptance’. Renewable energy projects often give rise to local conflict. The successful implementation of local renewable energy systems depends on the support of the local social fabric. While at one hand decisions to construct wind turbines in specific regions trigger local resistance, the opposite also occurs! Solar parks sometimes create a similar variation: Various communities try to prevent the construction of solar parks in their vicinity, while other communities proudly present their parks. Altogether, local renewable energy initiatives create a rather chaotic picture, if regarded from the perspective of government planning. However, if we regard the successes, it appears the top down initiatives are most successful in areas with a weak social fabric, like industrial areas, or rather recently reclaimed land. Deeply rooted communities, virtually only have successful renewable energy projects that are more or less bottom up initiatives. This paper will first sketch why participation is important, and present a categorisation of processes and procedures that could be applied. It also sketches a number of myths and paradoxes that might occur in participation processes. ‘Compensating’ individuals and/or communities to accept wind turbines or solar parks is not sufficient to gain ‘acceptance’. A basic feature of many debates on local renewable energy projects is about ‘fairness’. The implication is that decision-making is neither on pros and cons of various renewable energy technologies as such, nor on what citizens are obliged to accept, but on a fair distribution of costs and benefits. Such discussions on fairness cannot be short cut by referring to legal rules, scientific evidence, or to standard financial compensations. History plays a role as old feelings of being disadvantaged, both at individual and at group level, might re-emerge in such debates. The paper will provide an overview of various local controversies on renewable energy initiatives in the Netherlands. It will argue that an open citizen participation process can be organized to work towards fair decisions, and that citizens should not be addressed as greedy subjects, trying to optimise their own private interests, but as responsible persons.
DOCUMENT
Om de onderzoeksvraag “Waar kan Rijkswaterstaat verantwoord doorgroeibare verhardingen toepassen op verzorgingsplaatsen?” te beantwoorden zijn de volgende methoden gebruikt: literatuuronderzoek, interviews met RWS-medewerkers, inventarisatie van voorbeelden uit praktijk met behulp van ClimateScan.nl.
LINK
In opdracht van de Dienst Stedelijke Ontwikkeling en Beheer gemaakte sociale analyse van de wijk Lakerlopen in Eindhoven in het kader van de integrale wijkvernieuwing. Lakerlopen is statistisch gezien een van de 'slechtse'wijken van Eindhoven. Dit onderzoek heeft als insteek de sociale relaties tussen bewoners onderzocht. In de wijk worden bijna 30 leefgebieden onderscheiden. Leefgebieden zijn die pleintjes, straten, flats e.d. wat bewoners tot hun directe woonomgeving rekenen, en waarbij zij zich erg betrokken voelen. Dit onderzoek toont aan dat het niveau van de sociale relaties in de leefgebieden voornamelijk op of boven de gestelde norm zit. Voor vele betrokkenen, van actieve bewoner tot stedebouwkundige, was dit een verrassende uitkomst; het zorgde voor nieuw elan in de wijkvernieuwing, en een andere kijk op aandachtswijken in Eindhoven.
DOCUMENT
