This video presents BiebBeep, an interactive touchscreen system that has been developed with the aim to support information and social services for the New Library in Almere, The Netherlands. The constantly updated information displayed on the interactive screen concerns not only the library itself, but also features happenings in the local area. The system's distinctive feature is that people can add information to the screen themselves, such as tweets, photos, local and cultural news announcements, so that the library and its visitors can inform and connect with each other. Over the course of almost one year, several studies were conducted, including focus group, interview- and observation-based studies that have motivated the functionality, and particularly the user-generated and localized content the system supports. Consequently, the services and functionality the system offers are aimed towards supporting Library 2.0, the next generation library.
MULTIFILE
In dit artikel wordt ingegaan op de snel veranderende digitale wereld. Want het stof rondom de term 'web 2.0' mag zo langzamerhand dan wel opgetrokken zijn, vragen blijven er genoeg. Welke impact hebben al die elkaar steeds sneller opvolgende ontwikkelingen nu eigenlijk op bibliotheken? In hoeverre dringt web 2.0 al door in de organisatie, in de werkprocessen, de klantbenadering en in de digitale bibliotheek? Vergt het wellicht ook een andere attitude van de bibliotheekmanager? En welke gevolgen heeft web 2.0 voor het functieprofiel van de informatiespecialist? Vragen als deze en nog meer, worden in dit artikel verder uitgediept.
DOCUMENT
Over the past 15 years the Web has transformed the ways in which we search for information and use it. In more recent years, we have seen the emergence of a new array of innovative tools that collectively go under the name of 'Web 2.0', in which the information user is also increasingly an information producer (i.e., prosumer), by sharing or creating content. The success of Web 2.0 tools for personal use is only partially replicated in the professional sphere and, particularly, in the academic environment in relation with research and teaching. To date, very few studies have explored the level of adoption of Web 2.0 among academic researchers in their research and teaching activity. It is not known in what way how and how much Web 2.0 is currently used within research communities, and we are not aware of the drivers and the drawbacks of the use of Web 2.0 tools in academia, where the majority of people is focused either on research or on teaching activities. To analyse these issues, i.e. the combined adoption of Web 2.0 tools in teaching and research, the authors carried out a survey among teaching and researching staff of the University of Breda in The Netherlands. This country was chosen mainly because it is on the cutting edge as far as innovation is concerned. An important driver in choosing the Breda University's academic community was the fact that one of the two authors of this survey works as senior researcher at this university. The purpose of our survey was to explore the level of adoption of Web 2.0 tools among the academic communities. We were interested in investigating how they were using these tools in the creation of scientific knowledge both in their research and teaching activity. We were also interested in analysing differences in the level of adoption of Web 2.0 tools with regard to researchers' position, age, gender, and research field. Finally, in our study we explored the issue of peer reviewing in the Web 2.0 setting. In particular, we investigated whether social peer review is regarded by researchers as a viable alternative to the current closed peer review system (single-blind or double blind). We approached about 60 staff members, but only 12 faculty members completed the survey fully. This means that our results can only be regarded as exploratory, but we still believe that they represent a complementary perspective with respect to previous studies.
LINK
This paper presents the design and long-term study of BiebBeep, a large interactive touchscreen that has been developed with the aim to augment the information and social function of a library. BiebBeep displays user-generated and context-relevant content, such as information about local events and book trailers. The system’s distinctive feature is that people can add information to the screen themselves, such as tweets and Flickr photos, so that the library and its visitors can inform and connect with each other. For more than a year, the BiebBeep system has been iterated and studied in the library. The research approach presented is an exemplar of the study of a public screen in situ for long-term to best meet the demands for its actual use in present and future.
DOCUMENT
This speech discusses how the professorship intends to support practitioners in the nursing domain and contribute to shaping nursing leadership and each person's professional individuality. The title of the speech, “Notes on Nursing 2.0,” is particularly intended to emphasize the need for these changes in the nursing domain. Not by assuming that nothing has changed in care and nursing since Nightingale's time. There has. Being educated in the professional domain is not only a given but a requirement. The knowledge domain of care and nursing has developed far and wide in nursing diagnostics and standards. Nursing science research, which Nightingale once started as the first female statistician in the British Kingdom, has firmly established itself in education and practice. Wanting to be of significance to others out of compassion is still the professional motivation, but there is no longer a subservient servitude (Cingel van der, 2012). At the same time, wholehearted leadership is not yet taken for granted in daily practice and optimal professional practice falters due to an equality principle of differently educated caregivers and nurses that has been held for too long. That is the need for change to which this 2.0 version “Notes on Nursing” and the lectorate want to contribute in the coming years. Chapter 1, through the metaphors in the story “The Cat Who Looked at the King,” describes the vision of emancipatory action research and the change principles that the lectorate will deploy. Chapter 2 contains the reason, mission and lines of research that are interrelated within the lectorate. Chapters 3 and 4 address the themes of identity and leadership, discussing their interrelationship with professional practice and developing a research culture. In addition, specific aspects that influence practice and work culture today are addressed, and how the lectorate contributes specifically to the development of nursing leadership and the formation of professional identity in the relevant domain is described. Chapter 5 contains a summary of the principles on which the research program is based, as well as information on current and future projects. Chapter 6 provides background information on the lector and the members of the knowledge circle.
DOCUMENT
Voor je ligt het resultaat: Zo Smaakt de Toekomst 2.0, met daarin aandacht voor Polderen 3.0 en voor Circulair. Twee heel verschillende paden naar een duurzame voedseltoekomst, die, samen met ons eerste Zo Smaakt de Toekomst, een beeld geven van de diversiteit van de Zuid-Hollandse voedseltransitie. Met daarin ruimte voor verschillende visies, waarin het ook mag schuren, waarin je je kunt herkennen en waardoor je je kunt laten inspireren – zodat jij, net als vele andere pioniers, beleidsmakers, onderzoekers, burgers en enthousiastelingen, kunt bijdragen aan een duurzaam en eerlijk landbouw- en voedselsysteem. We bespreken eerst “Polderen 3.0” en daarna “Circulair.” We sluiten af met een aantal geleerde lessen en aanbevelingen.
MULTIFILE
Wat gebeurt er als medewerkers van erfgoedinstellingen de wereld in trekken en hun publiek opzoeken, soms letterlijk op straat? Raken ze het spoor bijster of vinden ze juist nieuwe wegen in onze chaotische netwerksamenleving? Dit woudlopershandboek is vooral het verslag van een dergelijk avontuur in Gouda in 2007 en 2008. Burgers worden mondiger en maken dankbaar gebruik van nieuwe media. Klassieke culturele instellingen als musea, archieven of bibliotheken vragen zich af hoe ze zich tot deze ontwikkelingen moeten verhouden. Zo ook in Gouda... en daar gaan ze dan soep koken op de markt. Waarom ze dat doen, en waarom dat een goed idee is, komt in dit woudlopershandboek aan de orde. Dit is het verslag van hun zoektocht naar een nieuwe plek in onze gemedialiseerde samenleving. En net als 'Scouting for boys' van Robert Baden-Powell staat het vol met sterke verhalen, tips en trucs, vaardigheden en harde lessen voor onderzoeker en hun begeleiders. Het avontuur speelde zich af in Gouda, maar we hopen dat onze ervaringen ook elders een bron van inspiratie kunnen zijn.
DOCUMENT
Gaan rendabele teelt én natuurontwikkeling samen? Een 7-jarig samenwerkingsproject vanuit de keten met strokenteelt.
LINK
