In the era of social media, online reviews have become a crucial factor influencing the exposure of tourist destinations and the decision-making of potential tourists, exerting a profound impact on the sustainable development of these destinations. However, the influence of review valence on visit intention, especially the role of affective commitment and reputation (ability vs. responsibility), remains unclear. Drawing on emotion as a social information theory, this paper aims to elucidate the direct impact of different review valences on tourists’ visit intentions, as well as mediating mechanisms and boundary conditions. Three experiments indicate that positive (vs. negative) reviews can activate stronger affective commitment and visit intention, with affective commitment also playing a mediating role. Additionally, destination reputation significantly moderates the after-effects of review valences. More specifically, a responsibility reputation (compared with an ability reputation) weakens the effect of negative valence on affective commitment and visit intention. This study provides valuable theoretical insights into how emotional elements in online reviews influence the emotions and attitudes of potential tourists. Particularly for tourism managers, review valence and responsibility reputation hold practical significance in destination marketing.
MULTIFILE
Background The number of caesarean sections (CS) is increasing globally, and repeat CS after a previous CS is a significant contributor to the overall CS rate. Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) can be seen as a real and viable option for most women with previous CS. To achieve success, however, women need the support of their clinicians (obstetricians and midwives). The aim of this study was to evaluate clinician-centred interventions designed to increase the rate of VBAC. Methods The bibliographic databases of The Cochrane Library, PubMed, PsychINFO and CINAHL were searched for randomised controlled trials, including cluster randomised trials that evaluated the effectiveness of any intervention targeted directly at clinicians aimed at increasing VBAC rates. Included studies were appraised independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted independently by three reviewers. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool, ‘Effective Public Health Practice Project’. The primary outcome measure was VBAC rates. Results 238 citations were screened, 255 were excluded by title and abstract. 11 full-text papers were reviewed; eight were excluded, resulting in three included papers. One study evaluated the effectiveness of antepartum x-ray pelvimetry (XRP) in 306 women with one previous CS. One study evaluated the effects of external peer review on CS birth in 45 hospitals, and the third evaluated opinion leader education and audit and feedback in 16 hospitals. The use of external peer review, audit and feedback had no significant effect on VBAC rates. An educational strategy delivered by an opinion leader significantly increased VBAC rates. The use of XRP significantly increased CS rates. Conclusions This systematic review indicates that few studies have evaluated the effects of clinician-centred interventions on VBAC rates, and interventions are of varying types which limited the ability to meta-analyse data. A further limitation is that the included studies were performed during the late 1980s-1990s. An opinion leader educational strategy confers benefit for increasing VBAC rates. This strategy should be further studied in different maternity care settings and with professionals other than physicians only.
MULTIFILE
Background: The number of people suffering from one or more chronic conditions is rising, resulting in an increase in patients with complex health care demands. Interprofessional collaboration and the use of shared care plans support the management of complex health care demands of patients with chronic illnesses. This study aims to get an overview of the scientific literature on developing interprofessional shared care plans. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of the scientific literature regarding the development of interprofessional shared care plans. A systematic database search resulted in 45 articles being included, 5 of which were empirical studies concentrating purely on the care plan. Findings were synthesised using directed content analysis. Results: This review revealed three themes. The first theme was the format of the shared care plan, with the following elements: patient’s current state; goals and concerns; actions and interventions; and evaluation. The second theme concerned the development of shared care plans, and can be categorised as interpersonal, organisational and patient-related factors. The third theme covered tools, whose main function is to support professionals in sharing patient information without personal contact. Such tools relate to documentation of and communication about patient information. Conclusion: Care plan development is not a free-standing concept, but should be seen as the result of an underlying process of interprofessional collaboration between team members, including the patient. To integrate the patients’ perspectives into the care plans, their needs and values need careful consideration. This review indicates a need for new empirical studies examining the development and use of shared care plans and evaluating their effects.
Ruim 10% van de Nederlandse bevolking heeft chronische nierschade. Jaarlijks komen er zo’n 2.000 patiënten met nierfalen bij. Bij terminaal nierfalen is uiteindelijk nierfunctie vervangende therapie noodzakelijk (1, 2). Nierfalen en nierfunctievervangende therapie hebben grote invloed op de voedingstoestand van de patiënt wat leidt tot ondervoeding wat zich uit in verlies van spiermassa, spierkracht, verminderde zelfredzaamheid, verminderd fysiek functioneren, hogere mortaliteit, meer ziekenhuis opnames en een lagere kwaliteit van leven (3). Gezien deze associatie kan een interventie die het verlies van spiermassa kan voorkomen, grote impact hebben voor nierpatiënten. Echter is er nog geen informatie over de voedselinname van de Nederlandse hemodialysepatiënt. Dit belemmert de diëtetiek in het optimaal behandelen van hemodialysepatiënten. In samenwerking met het kennisnetwerk Diëtisten Nierziekten Nederland (DNN) en MKB hebben wij de volgende vragen gedefinieerd: 1) Wat is de huidige dagelijkse inname van macro- en micronutriënten van hemodialysepatiënten en 2) Bestaan er effectieve interventies op het gebeid van voeding en beweging om spiermassa verlies te voorkomen en/of te behandelen? Samenvattend bestaat dit voorstel uit de volgende activiteiten: Werkpakket 1: Landelijk multicenter studie naar de huidige inname van macro- en micronutriënten van hemodialysepatiënten, Werkpakket 2: Formeren van (inter)nationaal netwerk van professionals en wetenschappers die zich focussen op de rol van voeding en beweging bij nierziekten aangevuld met patiënten perspectief vanuit de patiëntenverenigingen, Werkpakket 3: Systematic review naar effectieve voedings- en beweeginterventies bij patiënten met nierfalen en Werkpakket 4: Het schrijven van een projectvoorstel dat de behoefte, rol en implementatie van eiwitrijke voeding en beweging onderzoekt op het behoud en/of verbeteren van spiermassa, fysiek functioneren en kwaliteit van leven van mensen met een nierziekte.
