Background: The maternity care system in the Netherlands is well known for its support of community-based midwifery. However, regular midwifery practices typically do not offer caseload midwifery care – one-to-one continuity of care throughout pregnancy and birth. Because we know very little about the outcomes for women receiving caseload care in the Netherlands, we compared caseload care with regular midwife-led care, looking at maternal and perinatal outcomes, including antenatal and intrapartum referrals to secondary (i.e., obstetrician-led) care. Methods: We selected 657 women in caseload care and 1954 matched controls (women in regular midwife-led care) from all women registered in the Dutch Perinatal Registry (Perined) who gave birth in 2015. To be eligible for selection the women had to be in midwife-led antenatal care beyond 28 gestational weeks. Each woman in caseload care was matched with three women in regular midwife-led care, using parity, maternal age, background (Dutch or non-Dutch) and region. These two cohorts were compared for referral rates, mode of birth, and other maternal and perinatal outcomes. Results: In caseload midwifery care, 46.9% of women were referred to obstetrician-led care (24.2% antenatally and 22.8% in the intrapartum period). In the matched cohort, 65.7% were referred (37.4% antenatally and 28.3% in the intrapartum period). In caseload care, 84.0% experienced a spontaneous vaginal birth versus 77.0% in regular midwife-led care. These patterns were observed for both nulliparous and multiparous women. Women in caseload care had fewer inductions of labour (13.2% vs 21.0%), more homebirths (39.4% vs 16.1%) and less perineal damage (intact perineum: 41.3% vs 28.2%). The incidence of perinatal mortality and a low Apgar score was low in both groups. Conclusions: We found that when compared to regular midwife-led care, caseload midwifery care in the Netherlands is associated with a lower referral rate to obstetrician-led care – both antenatally and in the intrapartum period – and a higher spontaneous vaginal birth rate, with similar perinatal safety. The challenge is to include this model as part of the current effort to improve the quality of Dutch maternity care, making caseload care available and affordable for more women.
In most countries, maternal and newborn care is fragmented and focused on identification and treatment of pathology that affects only the minority of women and babies. Recently, a framework for quality maternal and newborn care was developed, which encourages a system-level shift to provide skilled care for all.This care includes preventive and supportive care that works to strengthen women’s capabilities and focuses on promotion of normal reproductive processes while ensuring access to emergency treatment when needed. Midwifery care is pivotal in this framework, which contains several elements that resonate with the main dimensions of primary care. Primary health care is the first level of contact with the health system where most of the population’s curative and preventive health needs can be fulfilled as close as possible to where people live and work. In this paper, we argue that midwifery as described in the framework requires the application of a primary care philosophy for all childbearing women and infants. Evaluation of the implementation of the framework should therefore include tools to monitor the performance of primary midwifery care.
MULTIFILE
Zorgcapaciteit kan een belangrijke schakel zijn tussen multi-probleem omstandigheden en ongunstige ontwikkeling van kinderen. Deze studie heeft als doel om de zorgcapaciteit en de correlaties daartussen te onderzoeken in zeer kwetsbare multiprobleemgezinnen in Rotterdam, Nederland. Zorgcapaciteit (algemeen, emotioneel en instrumenteel) werd prospectief beoordeeld bij 83 zeer kwetsbare vrouwen met behulp van video-observaties van dagelijkse zorgtaken, zes weken postpartum. Ondersteunende gegevens werden verzameld op drie tijdstippen: bij inclusie, zes weken na inclusie en zes weken postpartum, en deze omvatten psychologische symptomen, zelfredzaamheid, problematische levensdomeinen, thuisomgeving, inkomen, depressie, angst en stress. Zwangerschaps- en bevallingsgerelateerde informatie werd verzameld bij verloskundigen. De scores voor zorgverlening door de moeder waren gemiddeld van onvoldoende kwaliteit. Moeders die in een onveilige thuisomgeving leefden (B = 0,62) en moeders met meer problematische levensdomeinen (≤3 domeinen, B = 0,32) vertoonden significant hogere instrumentele zorgcapaciteiten. Andere variabelen waren niet gerelateerd aan zorgcapaciteit. De zorgcapaciteit in deze zeer kwetsbare populatie was van onvoldoende kwaliteit. In de meeste gevallen was er echter geen significant verband tussen zorgzaamheid en de variabelen die gerelateerd zijn aan kwetsbaarheid. Dit betekent dat een mogelijk verband tussen kwetsbaarheid en zorgcapaciteit kan worden veroorzaakt door de interactie tussen verschillende problemen, in plaats van door het type of de omvang van de zorg.
MULTIFILE
