The past decades have shown an accelerated development of technology-enhanced or digital education. Although an important and recognized precondition for study success, still little attention has been paid to examining how an affective learning climate can be fostered in online training programs. Besides gaining insight into the dynamics of affective learning itself it is of vital importance to know what predicts trainees’ intention to transfer new knowledge and skills to other contexts. The present study investigated the influence of five affective learner characteristics from the transfer literature (learner readiness, motivation to learn, expected positive outcomes, expected negative outcomes, personal capacity) on trainees’ pre-training transfer intention. Participants were 366 adult students enrolled in an online course in information literacy in a distance learning environment. As information literacy is a generic competence, applicable in various contexts, we developed a novel multicontextual transfer perspective and investigated within one single study the influence of the abovementioned variables on pre-training transfer intention for both the students’ Study and Work contexts. The hypothesized model has been tested using structural equation modeling. The results showed that motivation to learn, expected positive personal outcomes, and learner readiness were the strongest predictors. Results also indicated the benefits of gaining pre-training insight into the specific characteristics of multiple transfer contexts, especially when education in generic competences is involved. Instructional designers might enhance study success by taking affective transfer elements and multicontextuality into account when designing digital education.
MULTIFILE
Background: The aim of this study is to validate a newly developed nurses' self-efficacy sources inventory. We test the validity of a five-dimensional model of sources of self-efficacy, which we contrast with the traditional four-dimensional model based on Bandura's theoretical concepts. Methods: Confirmatory factor analysis was used in the development of the newly developed self-efficacy measure. Model fit was evaluated based upon commonly recommended goodness-of-fit indices, including the χ2 of the model fit, the Root Mean Square Error of approximation (RMSEA), the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR), and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Results: All 22 items of the newly developed five-factor sources of self-efficacy have high factor loadings (range .40-.80). Structural equation modeling showed that a five-factor model is favoured over the four-factor model. Conclusions and implications: Results of this study show that differentiation of the vicarious experience source into a peer- and expert based source reflects better how nursing students develop self-efficacy beliefs. This has implications for clinical learning environments: a better and differentiated use of self-efficacy sources can stimulate the professional development of nursing students.
De analyse van data over het leren van studenten kan waardevol zijn. 'Learning analytics' gebruikt studentdata om het leerproces te verbeteren. Welke organisatorische vaardigheden hebben Nederlandse instellingen voor hoger onderwijs nodig om learning analytics succesvol in te zetten?Doel We onderzoeken welke organisatievaardigheden er nodig zijn om in het hoger onderwijs met 'learning analytics' te werken. Met learning analytics krijgen studenten, docenten en studiebegeleiders inzicht in het leerproces. Dit doen ze door data van studenten te analyseren. In de praktijk blijkt het lastig voor onderwijsinstellingen om hier over de hele breedte van de organisatie mee te gaan werken. We kijken in dit onderzoek welke vaardigheden er nodig zijn binnen een organisatie om 'learning analytics' slim in te zetten. Resultaten Dit onderzoek loopt. Tot nu toe hebben we drie wetenschappelijke artikelen gepubliceerd: A First Step Towards Learning Analytics: Implementing an Experimental Learning Analytics Tool Where is the learning in learning analytics? A systematic literature review to identify measures of affected learning From Dirty Data to Multiple Versions of Truth: How Different Choices in Data Cleaning Lead to Different Learning Analytics Outcomes Looptijd 01 december 2016 - 01 december 2020 Aanpak Het onderzoek bestaat uit literatuuronderzoek, een case study bij Nederlandse onderwijsinstellingen en een validatieproject. Dit leidt tot de ontwikkeling van een Learning Analytics Capability Model (LACM): een model dat beschrijft welke organisatorische vaardigheden nodig zijn om learning analytics in de praktijk toe te passen.