Background Providing individualized care based on the context and preferences of the patient is important. Knowledge on both prognostic risk stratification and blended eHealth care in musculoskeletal conditions is increasing and seems promising. Stratification can be used to match patients to the most optimal content and intensity of treatment as well as mode of treatment delivery (i.e. face-to-face or blended with eHealth). However, research on the integration of stratified and blended eHealth care with corresponding matched treatment options for patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints is lacking. Methods This study was a mixed methods study comprising the development of matched treatment options, followed by an evaluation of the feasibility of the developed Stratified Blended Physiotherapy approach. In the first phase, three focus groups with physiotherapists and physiotherapy experts were conducted. The second phase investigated the feasibility (i.e. satisfaction, usability and experiences) of the Stratified Blended Physiotherapy approach for both physiotherapists and patients in a multicenter single-arm convergent parallel mixed methods feasibility study. Results In the first phase, matched treatment options were developed for six patient subgroups. Recommendations for content and intensity of physiotherapy were matched to the patient’s risk of persistent disabling pain (using the Keele STarT MSK Tool: low/medium/high risk). In addition, selection of mode of treatment delivery was matched to the patient’s suitability for blended care (using the Dutch Blended Physiotherapy Checklist: yes/no). A paperbased workbook and e-Exercise app modules were developed as two different mode of treatment delivery options, to support physiotherapists. Feasibility was evaluated in the second phase. Physiotherapists and patients were mildly satisfied with the new approach. Usability of the physiotherapist dashboard to set up the e-Exercise app was considered ‘OK’ by physiotherapists. Patients considered the e-Exercise app to be of ‘best imaginable’ usability. The paper-based workbook was not used. Conclusion Results of the focus groups led to the development of matched treatment options. Results of the feasibility study showed experiences with integrating stratified and blended eHealth care and have informed amendments to the Stratified Blended Physiotherapy approach for patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints ready to use within a future cluster randomized trial.
Malnutrition is a frequent problem in patients with head and neck cancer. Prevention or timely treatment of malnutrition isof great importance because deteriorated nutritional status can have a negative effect on clinical outcome in head andneck cancer patients.Malnutrition is a multidimensional problem, in which a nutritional disbalance causes loss of weight and muscle mass, eitheror not accompanied by inflammatory activity, resulting in functional decline.Thus far, little is known about the role of physical activity in both the development and treatment of malnutrition in cancerpatients. Although positive effects of exercise on fatigue and quality of life have been reported, the relationship betweenphysical activity and prevention and treatment of malnutrition needs to be further elucidated.In this presentation, current insights and hypotheses on the relationship between physical activity and nutritional status inpatients with cancer will be discussed.
Background: Neck and shoulder complaints are common in primary care physiotherapy. These patients experience pain and disability, resulting in high societal costs due to, for example, healthcare use and work absence. Content and intensity of physiotherapy care can be matched to a patient’s risk of persistent disabling pain. Mode of care delivery can be matched to the patient’s suitability for blended care (integrating eHealth with physiotherapy sessions). It is hypothesized that combining these two approaches to stratified care (referred to from this point as Stratified Blended Approach) will improve the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy for patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints compared to usual physiotherapy. Methods: This paper presents the protocol of a multicenter, pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group, cluster randomized controlled trial. A total of 92 physiotherapists will be recruited from Dutch primary care physiotherapy practices. Physiotherapy practices will be randomized to the Stratified Blended Approach arm or usual physiotherapy arm by a computer-generated random sequence table using SPSS (1:1 allocation). Number of physiotherapists (1 or > 1) will be used as a stratification variable. A total of 238 adults consulting with neck and/or shoulder complaints will be recruited to the trial by the physiotherapy practices. In the Stratified Blended Approach arm, physiotherapists will match I) the content and intensity of physiotherapy care to the patient’s risk of persistent disabling pain, categorized as low, medium or high (using the Keele STarT MSK Tool) and II) the mode of care delivery to the patient’s suitability and willingness to receive blended care. The control arm will receive physiotherapy as usual. Neither physiotherapists nor patients in the control arm will be informed about the Stratified Blended Approach arm. The primary outcome is region-specific pain and disability (combined score of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index & Neck Pain and Disability Scale) over 9 months. Effectiveness will be compared using linear mixed models. An economic evaluation will be performed from the societal and healthcare perspective. Discussion: The trial will be the first to provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Stratified Blended Approach compared with usual physiotherapy in patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints.
Betonprinten biedt veel nieuwe mogelijkheden op het gebied van productie en materiaal, maar vraagt van het MKB en startups flinke investeringen in kennis en middelen om er mee aan de slag te gaan. Met name slicer software, dat 3D modellen omzet naar printercode, vormt een bottleneck omdat deze alleen commercieel en printer-specifiek verkrijgbaar zijn. Saxion, Vertico en White Lioness willen in dit project de haalbaarheid van gratis open source slicer software die als cloud dienst wordt aangeboden onderzoeken. Deze oplossing maakt betonprinten bereikbaar voor meer innovatieve toepassingen vanuit MKB en startups, en vormt een platform voor het verzamelen en delen van kennis op het gebied van betonprinten.
3D-printen is inmiddels een volwassen productietechniek en wordt ook steeds meer ingezet voor medische toepassingen, omdat het voor medisch specialisten steeds meer vanzelfsprekend wordt dat zorg wordt afgestemd op de behoeften en wensen van de patiënt. Ook de therapeutische wereld volgt deze ontwikkelingen en willen hier meer mee doen, om zo hun patiënten optimaal te kunnen helpen. De bottlenecks voor het daadwerkelijk implementeren van 3D-printen in het alledaagse proces van de podotherapeut zitten voornamelijk in de kostprijs, snelheid van produceren, beperking aan goede materialen en de onmogelijkheid om de geprinte zool nadien aan te passen. Daarnaast zorgt de diversiteit aan mogelijkheden voor een diffuus beeld voor de podotherapeutische bedrijven omtrent wat nu de juiste productietechniek en het juiste materiaal is om te gebruiken. De praktijkvraag die in dit project beantwoord wordt is: In welke situatie is welke materiaal-productieproces combinatie van de 3D-printtechniek geschikt voor podotherapeutische zolen? Middels gebruiksonderzoek en scenario’s worden de eisen en wensen van de podotherapeuten achterhaald, welke worden gekoppeld aan de uitkomsten van het literatuuronderzoek. Deze ontwerp-proces-materiaal-combinaties worden experimenteel getest en verbeterd. Aan de hand van de uitkomsten worden ontwerp-afhankelijke richtlijnen opgesteld voor de podotherapeuten om zo een goede materiaal-proces selectie te kunnen maken voor het gebruik van 3D-printen voor podotherapeutische zolen.
Relatie tussen spiermassa en vroegtijdig stoppen van chemotherapie bij patienten met hoofd-halskankerIn this study, we aim to assess whether low pre-treatment muscle mass, measured with CT at thoracic (T4) or lumbar level (L3) is associated with early termination of chemotherapy related to toxicity in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.
