Purpose / objective: Head and neck cancer patients treated with chemoradiation are at risk for developing trismus (reduced mouth opening). Trismus is often a persisting side-effect and difficult to manage. It impairs eating, speech and oral hygiene, affecting quality of life. Although several studies identified the masseter muscle (MM) as one of the main organs at risk, currently this structure is rarely considered during treatment planning. Prospective studies for chemoradiation are lacking. The aim of our study was to quantify the relationship between radiation dose to the MM and development of radiation-induced trismus in an IMRT-VMAT population. Results: At the first evaluation, 6-12 weeks post-treatment, fourteen patients had developed radiation-induced trismus (15%). On average, mouth opening decreased with 4.1 mm, or 8.2 % relative to baseline. Mean dose to the ipsilateral MM was a stronger predictor for trismus than mean dose to the contralateral MM, as indicated by the lowest -2 log likelihood (Table 1). Figure 1A shows the correlation between the ipsilateral mean masseter dose and the relative decrease in mouth opening, with trismus cases indicated in red. No trismus cases were observed in 33 patients (35%) with a mean dose to the ipsilateral MM < 20 Gy. The risk of trismus in the other 60 patients (65%) increased with higher mean doses to the ipsilateral MM. Figure 1B shows the fitted NTCP curve as a function of the mean dose, with a TD50 of 55 Gy. The actual incidence (with 1 SE) of trismus cases within 5 dose bins is indicated as well, showing a good correspondence with the NTCP fit with a relatively large uncertainty in the dose area > 50 Gy. Patients with tumors located in the oropharynx were at highest risk.
Background Providing individualized care based on the context and preferences of the patient is important. Knowledge on both prognostic risk stratification and blended eHealth care in musculoskeletal conditions is increasing and seems promising. Stratification can be used to match patients to the most optimal content and intensity of treatment as well as mode of treatment delivery (i.e. face-to-face or blended with eHealth). However, research on the integration of stratified and blended eHealth care with corresponding matched treatment options for patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints is lacking. Methods This study was a mixed methods study comprising the development of matched treatment options, followed by an evaluation of the feasibility of the developed Stratified Blended Physiotherapy approach. In the first phase, three focus groups with physiotherapists and physiotherapy experts were conducted. The second phase investigated the feasibility (i.e. satisfaction, usability and experiences) of the Stratified Blended Physiotherapy approach for both physiotherapists and patients in a multicenter single-arm convergent parallel mixed methods feasibility study. Results In the first phase, matched treatment options were developed for six patient subgroups. Recommendations for content and intensity of physiotherapy were matched to the patient’s risk of persistent disabling pain (using the Keele STarT MSK Tool: low/medium/high risk). In addition, selection of mode of treatment delivery was matched to the patient’s suitability for blended care (using the Dutch Blended Physiotherapy Checklist: yes/no). A paperbased workbook and e-Exercise app modules were developed as two different mode of treatment delivery options, to support physiotherapists. Feasibility was evaluated in the second phase. Physiotherapists and patients were mildly satisfied with the new approach. Usability of the physiotherapist dashboard to set up the e-Exercise app was considered ‘OK’ by physiotherapists. Patients considered the e-Exercise app to be of ‘best imaginable’ usability. The paper-based workbook was not used. Conclusion Results of the focus groups led to the development of matched treatment options. Results of the feasibility study showed experiences with integrating stratified and blended eHealth care and have informed amendments to the Stratified Blended Physiotherapy approach for patients with neck and/or shoulder complaints ready to use within a future cluster randomized trial.
The general aim of this dissertation is to gain insight into the physiotherapeutic validity of physiotherapy research in subjects with non-specific neck pain. Chapter 1 describes the background of the research and the research questions and gives an overview of the studies performed. Chapter 2 presents the results of a systematic review (SR) of the completeness of the clinical reasoning process within the methodology of the RCT in patients with non-specific neck pain. For the SR analysis 122 studies were included. In the majority of studies (70%) the described clinical reasoning process was incomplete. There was scarcely any association between the degree of risk of bias and the completeness of the clinical reasoning process, indicating that better methodological quality does not necessarily imply a better description of clinical reasoning process. Chapter 3 presents the results of a SR in which we sought to identify published classification systems with a targeted treatment approach (treatment-based classification systems (TBCSs)) for patients with non-specific neck pain. Thirteen TBCSs were identified. In conclusion, existing treatment-based classification systems are of moderate quality at best. Moreover, these systems were not more effective than alternative treatments. Therefore, we do not recommend the use of these systems in daily physiotherapy practice. Chapter 4 describes a Delphi study of the clinical reasoning process of physiotherapy experts in unimodal interventions in patients with non-specific neck pain. This study had three goals. First, we aimed explore the expert opinions on the indication for physiotherapy when, other than neck pain, there are no positive signs and symptoms, no positive diagnostic tests or complaints of limitations in functioning or restrictions in participation. Second, we focused on the experts' use of measurement tools and when they are used to support and objectify the clinical reasoning process. Finally, we wanted to reach consensus among experts on the use of unimodal interventions in patients with non-specific neck pain. According to all experts, pain alone was not considered to be an indication for physiotherapy. Patient reported outcome measures were mainly used for evaluative purposes and physical tests for diagnostic and evaluative purposes. Only 6 of the 18 variants of sequential linear clinical reasoning reached a consensus of more than 50%. Chapter 5 describes a review that examined the completeness of the description of manipulation and mobilization interventions in randomized controlled trials of subjects with non-specific neck pain. In conclusion, mobilization or manipulation interventions are poorly reported in RCTs, compromising the external validity of RCTs, making it difficult for clinicians and researchers to replicate these interventions. Chapter 6 investigated the diagnostic physiotherapeutic process regarding limited ROM of the neck. It can be concluded that the overall diagnostic accuracy of physical examination is limited (compared to the CROM measurement). Therefore, a measurement device should be used in daily physical therapy practice to assess if a movement direction is restricted. Chapter 7 describes an exploratory, practice-oriented study into matched treatments in patients with non-specific neck pain. The objective of this study was 1) to establish the measurement error of the used accelerometer; 2) To determine which different treatments are used; 3) To explore if the cervical ROM, pain, (perceived) disability and motor control improved after one treatment. The SCT is a reliable accelerometer for measuring neck ROM, with a small measurement error. Eight different treatments were carried out. Pain, disability and left and right rotation showed a clinically relevant improvements (exceeded the measurement error). Chapter 8 comprises the general discussion. The general discussion presents an overview of this dissertation and discusses the strengths and limitations of the studies and possible implications of the results and recommendations for future research.
LINK
Betonprinten biedt veel nieuwe mogelijkheden op het gebied van productie en materiaal, maar vraagt van het MKB en startups flinke investeringen in kennis en middelen om er mee aan de slag te gaan. Met name slicer software, dat 3D modellen omzet naar printercode, vormt een bottleneck omdat deze alleen commercieel en printer-specifiek verkrijgbaar zijn. Saxion, Vertico en White Lioness willen in dit project de haalbaarheid van gratis open source slicer software die als cloud dienst wordt aangeboden onderzoeken. Deze oplossing maakt betonprinten bereikbaar voor meer innovatieve toepassingen vanuit MKB en startups, en vormt een platform voor het verzamelen en delen van kennis op het gebied van betonprinten.
3D-printen is inmiddels een volwassen productietechniek en wordt ook steeds meer ingezet voor medische toepassingen, omdat het voor medisch specialisten steeds meer vanzelfsprekend wordt dat zorg wordt afgestemd op de behoeften en wensen van de patiënt. Ook de therapeutische wereld volgt deze ontwikkelingen en willen hier meer mee doen, om zo hun patiënten optimaal te kunnen helpen. De bottlenecks voor het daadwerkelijk implementeren van 3D-printen in het alledaagse proces van de podotherapeut zitten voornamelijk in de kostprijs, snelheid van produceren, beperking aan goede materialen en de onmogelijkheid om de geprinte zool nadien aan te passen. Daarnaast zorgt de diversiteit aan mogelijkheden voor een diffuus beeld voor de podotherapeutische bedrijven omtrent wat nu de juiste productietechniek en het juiste materiaal is om te gebruiken. De praktijkvraag die in dit project beantwoord wordt is: In welke situatie is welke materiaal-productieproces combinatie van de 3D-printtechniek geschikt voor podotherapeutische zolen? Middels gebruiksonderzoek en scenario’s worden de eisen en wensen van de podotherapeuten achterhaald, welke worden gekoppeld aan de uitkomsten van het literatuuronderzoek. Deze ontwerp-proces-materiaal-combinaties worden experimenteel getest en verbeterd. Aan de hand van de uitkomsten worden ontwerp-afhankelijke richtlijnen opgesteld voor de podotherapeuten om zo een goede materiaal-proces selectie te kunnen maken voor het gebruik van 3D-printen voor podotherapeutische zolen.
Relatie tussen spiermassa en vroegtijdig stoppen van chemotherapie bij patienten met hoofd-halskankerIn this study, we aim to assess whether low pre-treatment muscle mass, measured with CT at thoracic (T4) or lumbar level (L3) is associated with early termination of chemotherapy related to toxicity in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.
