Abstract Background Clients with severe mental illness (SMI) have overall poor physical health. SMI reduces life expectancy by 5–17 years, primarily due to physical comorbidity linked to cardiometabolic risks that are mainly driven by unhealthy lifestyle behaviours. To improve physical health in clients with SMI, key elements are systematic somatic screening and lifestyle promotion. The nurse-led GILL eHealth was developed for somatic screening and the imple‑ mentation of lifestyle activities in clients with SMI. Aims of this study are to evaluate the efectiveness of the GILL eHealth intervention in clients with SMI compared to usual care, and to evaluate the implementation process, and the experiences of clients and healthcare providers with GILL eHealth. Methods The GILL study encompasses a cluster-randomised controlled trial in approximately 20 mental health care facilities in the Netherlands. The randomisation takes place at the team level, assigning clients to the eHealth inter‑ vention or the usual care group. The GILL eHealth intervention consists of two complementary modules for somatic screening and lifestyle promotion, resulting in personalised somatic treatment and lifestyle plans. Trained mental health nurses and nurse practitioners will implement the intervention within the multidisciplinary treatment context, and will guide and support the participants in promoting their physical health, including cardiometabolic risk management. Usual care includes treatment as currently delivered, with national guidelines as frame of reference. We aim to include 258 clients with SMI and a BMI of 27 or higher. Primary outcome is the metabolic syndrome severity score. Secondary outcomes are physical health measurements and participants’ reports on physical activity, perceived lifestyle behaviours, quality of life, recovery, psychosocial functioning, and health-related self-efcacy. Measurements will be completed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. A qualitative process evaluation will be conducted alongside, to evaluate the process of implementation and the experiences of clients and healthcare professionals with GILL eHealth. Discussion The GILL eHealth intervention is expected to be more efective than usual care in improving physical health and lifestyle behaviours among clients with SMI. It will also provide important information on implementation of GILL eHealth in mental health care. If proven efective, GILL eHealth ofers a clinically useful tool to improve physical health and lifestyle behaviours.
DOCUMENT
SAMENVATTING Mensen met een ernstige psychiatrische aandoening (EPA) hebben een sterk verminderde levensverwachting in vergelijking met de algemene populatie, vooral veroorzaakt door fysieke aandoeningen. Een ongezonde leefstijl speelt een belangrijke rol in de verminderde levensverwachting bij mensen met EPA. Ter bevordering van de fysieke gezondheid van deze doelgroep is de nurse-led e-health-interventie GILL (Gezondheid in Lichaam en Leefstijl) ontwikkeld voor somatische screening en het stimuleren van een gezonde(re) leefstijl. Door het uitvoeren van een cluster-gerandomiseerde studie (RCT) wordt onderzocht of de GILL e-health-interventie effectiever is dan de standaardzorg in het verbeteren van de fysieke gezondheid en leefstijl van mensen met EPA. De primaire uitkomstmaat van deze studie is de score voor de ernst van het metabool syndroom. Naast de RCT wordt een procesevaluatie uitgevoerd om de implementatie en de ervaringen van zowel de deelnemende cliënten als de hulpverleners met de GILLinterventie systematisch te evalueren.
DOCUMENT
Background In a large randomized trial, Utrecht PROactive Frailty Intervention Trial (U‐PROFIT), we evaluated the effectiveness of an integrated program on the preservation of daily functioning in older people in primary care that consisted of a frailty identification tool and a multicomponent nurse‐led care program. Examination of treatment fidelity is critical to successful translation of evidence‐based interventions into practice. Aims To assess treatment delivery, dose and content of nursing care delivered within the nurse‐led care program, and to explore if the delivery may have influenced the trial results. Methods A mixed‐methods study was conducted. Type and dose of nursing care were collected during the trial. Shortly after the trial, a focus group with nurses was conducted to explore reasons for the observed differences between the type and dose of nursing care delivered. Results A total of 835 older persons were included in the nurse‐led care program. The mean age was 75 years, 64% were female and 53.5% were living alone. The most frequent self‐reported conditions were loneliness (60.8%) and cognitive problems (59.4%). One‐third of the patients with a geriatric condition received an additional assessment (e.g., Mini‐Mental State Examination), and the majority of these patients received at least one nurse intervention (>85%). Most nursing care was delivered to patients at risk of falling and to those with urinary incontinence. Patients with nutrition problems seldom received nursing interventions. The nurses explained that differences in type and dose were influenced by the preference of the patient, the type of geriatric problem, and the time required to apply a nurse intervention. Linking Evidence to Action All intervention components were delivered; however, differences were observed in the type and dose of nursing care delivered across geriatric conditions. The findings better explain the treatment fidelity and suggest that there is room for improvement that may result in more beneficial patient outcomes.
LINK
