Aim and method: To examine in obese people the potential effectiveness of a six-week, two times weekly aquajogging program on body composition, fitness, health-related quality of life and exercise beliefs. Fifteen otherwise healthy obese persons participated in a pilot study. Results: Total fat mass and waist circumference decreased 1.4 kg (p = .03) and 3.1 cm (p = .005) respectively. The distance in the Six-Minute Walk Test increased 41 meters (p = .001). Three scales of the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite questionnaire improved: physical function (p = .008), self-esteem (p = .004), and public distress (p = .04). Increased perceived exercise benefits (p = .02) and decreased embarrassment (p = .03) were observed. Conclusions: Aquajogging was associated with reduced body fat and waist circumference, and improved aerobic fitness and quality of life. These findings suggest the usefulness of conducting a randomized controlled trial with long-term outcome assessments.
DOCUMENT
Elk jaar keren in Nederland tienduizenden gedetineerde personen terug vanuit detentie in de samenleving. Eén van de leefgebieden waarop in de begeleiding tijdens detentie dient te worden gefocust, is schulden. Ondanks dat veel gedetineerde personen kampen met (complexe) schulden wordt hieraan in de praktijk echter relatief weinig aandacht besteed en is er nog weinig inzicht in hoe al tijdens detentie effectieve begeleiding bij schulden kan worden geboden aan gedetineerde personen. Dit onderzoek is een evaluatie van de pilot ‘Schuldenzorgvrij uit detentie’ van de gemeente Den Haag die heeft plaatsgevonden in PI Alphen aan den Rijn. In deze pilot is onderzocht wat de ervaringen zijn indien al tijdens detentie wordt beginnen met het regelen van schulden van gedetineerde personen en wat daarbij knelpunten en succesfactoren zijn. De volgende hoofdvraag stond daarbij centraal: Hoe wordt de uitvoer van de pilot ‘Schuldenzorgvrij uit detentie’ ervaren en wat zijn belangrijke succesfactoren en aandachtspunten bij de uitvoer van de pilot? Om deze hoofdvraag te beantwoorden zijn de volgende methoden gehanteerd: i) in totaal 23 halfgestructureerde individuele diepte-interviews met deelnemers aan de pilot (N=5), medewerkers van PI Alphen aan den Rijn (N=5), de gemeente Den Haag (N=10), de reclassering (N=2) en het ministerie van Justitie en Veiligheid (N=1); ii) observatie van 2 reflectiesessies; en iii) analyse van 159 D&R-plannen. Op basis van deze methoden is gekomen tot de volgende antwoorden op de deelvragen: 1. Wat is de aard en omvang van de schuldenproblematiek bij gedetineerde personen in PI Alphen aan den Rijn die uitstromen naar de gemeente Den Haag? Meer dan 80% van de gedetineerde personen in PI Alphen aan den Rijn die uitstromen naar de gemeente Den Haag geven aan schulden hebben. Het type schulden van de gedetineerde personen betreft het meest CJIB-schulden. De gevolgen van de schulden zijn groot: er wordt veel stress ervaren vanwege schulden en schulden hebben een negatieve uitwerking op het re-integratieproces. 2. Hoe wordt de ondersteuning bij schuldenproblematiek ervaren buiten/voorafgaand aan de pilot? Hoewel schuldenaanpak één van de vijf basisvoorwaarden voor re-integratie is waaraan tijdens detentie dient te worden gewerkt, ontbreekt volgens alle betrokkenen een goede, consistente aanpak die aansluit bij de complexe schuldensituaties waarmee gedetineerde personen vaak te maken hebben. Gedetineerde personen buiten de pilot worden gedurende de vrijheidsstraf wel gemotiveerd om aan de slag te gaan met de schulden en schulden worden bijvoorbeeld opgenomen in het D&R-plan, maar de ondersteuning is oppervlakkig. Er is met name te weinig specifieke kennis, expertise en tijd beschikbaar om de juiste ondersteuning te bieden bij de complexe schuldensituaties. 3. Wat is het succes- of vorderingspercentage van de pilot? In totaal zijn er 22 aanmeldingen geweest voor de pilot. Dit heeft bij 12 personen geleid tot een schuldregeling of werden zij nog ondersteund om tot een schuldregeling te komen. Bij zes deelnemers is tijdens de pilot een saneringskrediet verleend en konden zij aan het afbetalingstraject beginnen of zijn hier reeds mee begonnen. Bij de negen andere deelnemers verschilt het op welk punt van het proces de deelnemers zich bevinden, maar werd nog gewerkt aan het rondkrijgen van een saneringskrediet. Daarnaast zijn 39 adviesgesprekken gehouden met gedetineerde personen in PI Alphen aan den Rijn. 4. Hoe wordt de uitvoer van de pilot door de deelnemers en betrokken experts ervaren? De pilot wordt over het algemeen door alle betrokkenen, zowel door deelnemers als betrokken experts, als zeer positief ervaren. De aanpak en ondersteuning door de schuldregelaars en samenwerking met andere betrokkenen vanuit de PI, reclassering en gemeente wordt gewaardeerd en draagt bij aan het verminderen van de negatieve gevolgen van schuldenproblematiek. Medewerkers van de PI gaven aan dat zij zelf doorgaans niet de expertise in huis hebben om te ondersteunen bij complexe schuldensituaties en dat op deze manier veel uit handen kan worden genomen en er belangrijke stappen kunnen worden gezet bij het ondersteunen van schulden. Het starten met intensief schuldregelen tijdens detentie werd als zeer positief ervaren, onder meer vanwege de grote negatieve gevolgen van schulden en omdat gedetineerde personen tijdens detentie ‘toch in de wachtstand zitten’. Alleen al het (idee van het) niet meer hebben van schulden levert rust en minder stress op, wat bijdraagt aan een positiever toekomstperspectief. 5. Wat zijn de succesfactoren en aandachtspunten van de pilot? De belangrijkste succesfactoren zijn: i) de kennis, beschikbaarheid en tijd van schuldregelaars in detentie om zo de juist informatie en ondersteuning te kunnen bieden; ii) een goede samenwerking tussen betrokkenen; iii) de ervaren gedrevenheid van betrokkenen; iv) motivatie van- de deelnemers. Aandachtspunten zijn: i) het aantal deelnemers aan de pilot; ii) (samen)werken en hoge werkdruk in de PI kan uitdagend zijn indien het ondersteunen bij schuldenproblematiek veel extra werk vraagt van medewerkers in de PI; iii) hulp van familie en vrienden van deelnemers is vaak essentieel maar niet altijd mogelijk; iv) de informatievoorziening over de duur van het schuldregelen en het verloop van de pilot kan nog verbeterd worden. Op basis van deze conclusies zijn de volgende drie kernaanbevelingen gedaan: i) een verbreding van de pilot wordt door de betrokkenen als wenselijk ervaren; ii) aanstelling van een vaste schuldregelaar kan al veel ondersteuning bieden en werk uit handen nemen; iii) verdere definiëring van inzet schuldhulpverlening.
DOCUMENT
Abstract Aims The involvement of an inter-professional healthcare student team in the review of medications used by geriatric patients could not only provide patients with optimized therapy but also provide students with a valuable inter-professional learning experience. We describe and evaluate the clinical and learning outcomes of an inter-professional student-run mediation review program (ISP). Subject and method A variable team consisting of students in medicine, pharmacy, master advanced nursing practice, and master physician assistant reviewed the medication lists of patients attending a specialized geriatric outpatient clinic. Results During 32 outpatient visits, 188 medications were reviewed. The students identified 14 medication-related problems, of which 4 were not recognized by healthcare professionals. The ISP team advised 95 medication changes, of which 68 (71.6%) were directly implemented. Students evaluated this pilot program positively and considered it educational (median score 4 out of 5) and thought it would contribute to their future inter-professional relationships. Conclusion An inter-professional team of healthcare students is an innovative healthcare improvement for (academic) hospitals to increase medication safety. Most formulated advices were directly incorporated in daily practice and could prevent future medication-related harm. The ISP also offers students a first opportunity to work in an inter-professional manner and get insight into the perspectives and qualities of their future colleagues.
MULTIFILE
Background: Hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) are highly prevalent worldwide. The guidelines recommend physical activity and education as the core treatments for osteoarthritis. Digital health has the potential to engage people in physical activity and disease management. Therefore, we conducted a pilot trial to assess the usability and preliminary effectiveness of an app-based physical activity and education program (Join2Move) compared to usual care for people with hip and/or knee OA in Germany. Methods: A randomized controlled pilot study was conducted. Individuals with diagnosed or self-reported knee and hip OA were included. Allocation to the intervention or control group was randomized. The intervention group received the Join2Move program. The Join2Move program was previously developed as a website and evaluated in the Netherlands. For the current study, the program was translated and adapted to the German context and adjusted from a website to an app. The control group received usual care. The primary outcomes were usability and preliminary effectiveness (pain and physical functioning). Measurements were taken at baseline and at twelve weeks. The data analysis was performed using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0). Results: Sixty participants, with a mean age of 61.9 (SD ± 7.2) years, were allocated to the intervention (n = 32) or the control group (n = 28) and included in the analysis. The majority of participants had knee OA (68%), and 12% had hip and knee OA. The dropout rate was n = 11 (18%). No adverse events were reported. Usability was rated as acceptable (mean System Usability Scale = 71.3/100) with a wide range (32.5 to 100). Statistically significant between-group differences were found only for pain (mean difference 8.52 (95% CI 1.01 to 16.04), p = 0.027). Conclusions: Join2Move demonstrated acceptable usability. The preliminary results of the pilot trial indicate the potential of a stand-alone app for the treatment of patients with hip or knee OA. However, the acceptable usability of Join2Move limits its recommendation for everyone. There appears to be room for improvement in app usability and in identifying patients for whom the app is suitable and the right time to use a stand-alone app.
LINK
MULTIFILE
BACKGROUND: Combining increased dietary protein intake and resistance exercise training for elderly people is a promising strategy to prevent or counteract the loss of muscle mass and decrease the risk of disabilities. Using findings from controlled interventions in a real-life setting requires adaptations to the intervention and working procedures of healthcare professionals (HCPs). The aim of this study is to adapt an efficacious intervention for elderly people to a real-life setting (phase one) and test the feasibility and potential impact of this prototype intervention in practice in a pilot study (phase two).METHODS: The Intervention Mapping approach was used to guide the adaptation in phase one. Qualitative data were collected from the original researchers, target group, and HCPs, and information was used to decide whether and how specified intervention elements needed to be adapted. In phase two, a one-group pre-test post-test pilot study was conducted (n = 25 community-dwelling elderly), to elicit further improvements to the prototype intervention. The evaluation included participant questionnaires and measurements at baseline (T0) and follow-up (T1), registration forms, interviews, and focus group discussions (T1). Qualitative data for both phases were analysed using an inductive approach. Outcome measures included physical functioning, strength, body composition, and dietary intake. Change in outcomes was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.RESULTS: The most important adaptations to the original intervention were the design of HCP training and extending the original protein supplementation with a broader nutrition programme aimed at increasing protein intake, facilitated by a dietician. Although the prototype intervention was appreciated by participants and professionals, and perceived applicable for implementation, the pilot study process evaluation resulted in further adaptations, mostly concerning recruitment, training session guidance, and the nutrition programme. Pilot study outcome measures showed significant improvements in muscle strength and functioning, but no change in lean body mass.CONCLUSION: The combined nutrition and exercise intervention was successfully adapted to the real-life setting and seems to have included the most important effective intervention elements. After adaptation of the intervention using insights from the pilot study, a larger, controlled trial should be conducted to assess cost-effectiveness.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NL51834.081.14 (April 22, 2015).
DOCUMENT
BACKGROUND: An early return to normal intake and early mobilization enhances postoperative recovery. However, one out of six surgical patients is undernourished during hospitalization and approximately half of the patients eat 50% or less of the food provided to them. We assessed the use of newly introduced breakfast buffets in two wards for gastrointestinal and oncological surgery and determined the impact on postoperative protein and energy intake.METHODS: A prospective pilot cohort study was conducted to assess the impact of the introduction of breakfast buffets in two surgical wards. Adult patients had the opportunity to choose between an attractive breakfast buffet and regular bedside breakfast service. Primary outcomes were protein and energy intake during breakfast. We asked patients to report the type of breakfast service and breakfast intake in a diary over a seven-day period. Prognostic factors were used during multivariable regression analysis.RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were included. The median percentage of buffet use per patient during the seven-day study period was 50% (IQR 0-83). Mean protein intake was 14.7 g (SD 8.4) and mean energy intake 332.3 kcal (SD 156.9). Predictors for higher protein intake included the use of the breakfast buffet (β = 0.06, p = 0.01) and patient weight (β = 0.13, p = 0.01). Both use of the breakfast buffet (β = 1.00, p = 0.02) and Delirium Observation Scale scores (β = -246.29, p = 0.02) were related to higher energy intake.CONCLUSION: Introduction of a breakfast buffet on a surgical ward was associated with higher protein and energy intake and it could be a promising approach to optimizing such intake in surgical patients. Large, prospective and preferably randomized studies should confirm these findings.
DOCUMENT
PURPOSE: To test if a collaborative care program (CCP) with nurses in a coordinating position is beneficial for patients with severe personality disorders. DESIGN AND METHODS: A pilot study with a comparative multiple case study design using mixed methods investigating active ingredients and preliminary results. FINDINGS: Most patients, their informal caregivers, and nurses value (parts of) the CCP positively; preliminary results show a significant decrease in severity of borderline symptoms. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: With the CCP,we may expand the supply of available treatments for patients with (severe) personality disorders, but a larger randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirmour preliminary results.
DOCUMENT
Deteriorated functioning is a part of the clinical-high risk (CHR) criteria for psychosis. Diminished social, educational and occupational functioning in the phase of late adolescence and early adulthood are associated with long-term social, economic and health consequences, which stresses the importance of early intervention to stimulate functioning. This pilot study examines the effectiveness and feasibility of the choose-get-keep model of Supported Education and Supported Employment (SEE) to improve educational and occupational functioning of individuals at CHR for a psychosis. A single blind randomized controlled pilot study combined SEE with treatment as usual (TAU) versus TAU among adolescents and early adults at CHR. School performance and job status as well as global functioning scales were assessed at twelve months. Of the 78 eligible participants, 20 individuals consented to participate in this study. At follow-up, participants in the intervention condition (n = 9) did not start an education more often than the participants in the control condition (n = 11) and the school results for both conditions were similar. However, in the intervention condition there were no school dropouts, more participants gained a job and worked longer hours. Two participants quit the intervention. This pilot study provides preliminary evidence that a SEE intervention is effective and feasible in sustaining and improving the level of both educational and occupational functioning of individuals at CHR for psychosis by supporting them in attaining, keeping and elaborating of their education or employment.
DOCUMENT
Background: Changes in reimbursement have been compelling for Dutch primary care practices to apply a disease management approach for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This approach includes individual patient consultations with a practice nurse, who coaches patients in COPD management. The aim of this study was to gauge the feasibility of adding a web-based patient self-management support application, by assessing patients’ self-management, patients’ health status, the impact on the organization of care, and the level of application use and appreciation. Methods: The study employed a mixed methods design. Six practice nurses recruited COPD patients during a consultation. The e-Health application included a questionnaire that captured information on demographics, self-management related behaviors (smoking cessation, physical activity and medication adherence) and their determinants, and nurse recommendations. The application provided tailored feedback messages to patients and provided the nurse with reports. Data were collected through questionnaires and medical record abstractions at baseline and one year later. Semi-structured interviews with patients and nurses were conducted. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative data and content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. Results: Eleven patients, recruited by three nurses, used the application 1 to 7 times (median 4). Most patients thought that the application supported self-management, but their interest diminished after multiple uses. Impact on patients’ health could not be determined due to the small sample size. Nurses reported benefits for the organization of care and made suggestions to optimize the use of the reports. Conclusion: Results suggest that it is possible to integrate a web-based COPD self-management application into the current primary care disease management process. The pilot study also revealed opportunities to improve the application and reports, in order to increase technology use and appreciation.
DOCUMENT
