This thesis focuses on topics such as preterm birth, variation in gross motor development, factors that influence (premature) infant gross motor development, and parental beliefs and practices. By gaining insight into these topics, this thesis aims to contribute to clinical decision-making of paediatric physiotherapists together with parents, and with that shape early intervention.
DOCUMENT
The studies reported on in this thesis addressed the development of suckingpatterns in preterm newborns. Preterm infants often have problems learningto suckle at the breast or to drink from a bottle. It is unclear whether this isdue to their preterm birth or whether it is the consequence of neurologicaldamage. From the literature, as well as from daily practice, we know thatthere is much variation in the time and in the way children start suckingnormally. Factors such as birth weight and gestational age may indeed berisk factors but they do not explain the differences in development. A smallspot-check proved that most hospitals in the Netherlands start infants onoral feeding by 34 weeks’ post-menstrual age (pma). By and large the policyis aimed at getting the infant to rely on oral feeding entirely as soon aspossible. The underlying rationale is to reduce the stay in hospital, and theidea that prolonged tube-feeding delays or even hampers the development ofsucking.
DOCUMENT
Aim The aim of this study is to gain more insight into child and environmental factors that influence gross motor development (GMD) of healthy infants from birth until reaching the milestone of independent walking, based on longitudinal research. Background A systematic search was conducted using Scopus, PsycINFO, MEDLINE and CINAHL to identify studies from inception to February 2020. Studies that investigated the association between child or environmental factors and infant GMD using longitudinal measurements of infant GMD were eligible. Two independent reviewers extracted key information and assessed risk of bias of the selected studies, using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool (QUIPS). Strength of evidence (strong, moderate, limited, conflicting and no evidence) for the factors identified was described according to a previously established classification. Results In 36 studies, six children and 11 environmental factors were identified. Five studies were categorized as having low risk of bias. Strong evidence was found for the association between birthweight and GMD in healthy full-term and preterm infants. Moderate evidence was found for associations between gestational age and GMD, and sleeping position and GMD. There was conflicting evidence for associations between twinning and GMD, and breastfeeding and GMD. No evidence was found for an association between maternal postpartum depression and GMD. Evidence for the association of other factors with GMD was classified as ‘limited’ because each of these factors was examined in only one longitudinal study. Conclusion Infant GMD appears associated with two child factors (birthweight and gestational age) and one environmental factor (sleeping position). For the other factors identified in this review, insufficient evidence for an association with GMD was found. For those factors that were examined in only one longitudinal study, and are therefore classified as having limited evidence, more research would be needed to reach a conclusion.
DOCUMENT
