Introduction In 2016 a new form of integrated community treatment for patients with serious mental illnesses was implemented in two neighborhoods in the city of Utrecht (335000 inhabitants) in the Netherlands. Treatment is characterized by close collaboration of psychiatric care, somatic care (i.e. general practitioner, nurse practitioner), supported housing and other facilities, i.e. the police officer, and is provided in the direct neighborhood of the patients. This ‘neighborhood based integrated mental health care’ should not contribute solely to clinical recovery, but also specifically to social and personal recovery. Objectives The aim of this research was to investigate the experience of patients with serious mental illnesses themselves receiving this new form of neighborhood-based integrated mental health care. More specific the question is studied if and how neighborhood-based integrated mental health care supports personal and social recovery. Methods To assess the experience of patients in depth qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 patients. Patients were asked to participate in interviews directly by the researchers, by their case managers and by experts by experience. Interview topics included personal and social recovery, resilience and self-efficacy related to the collective effort of caregivers. Qualitative data was analyzed by three independent researches with the qualitative computer program Tarzan. Strategies to enhance quality of data analysis (respondent validation) and validity (attention to negative cases) were used. Results The study will be finished in January 2019. Conclusions The results, a brief description of the collaborative care methodology offered and experiences of patients, and conclusions will be presented at the ENMESH conference.
Introduction: Over the past decade, frequent use of large quantities of nitrous oxide (N2O) has become more common in the Netherlands. Although N2O poses several negative health consequences for a subgroup of problematic N2O users, there is a lack of knowledge on what characterizes these intensive users. This study therefore aims to provide the demographic and substance use characteristics and experiences during treatment of treatment seeking problematic N2O users and to compare this with a matched group of treatment-seeking problematic cocaine users. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who were referred for treatment of problematic N2O use at a large Dutch addiction care facility from January 2020 to September 2022, extracting demographics, pattern of use and follow-up data. Additionally, a subgroup of N2O users was propensity-score matched (1:1) with a subgroup of treatment seeking problematic cocaine users, both groups excluding users with substance use disorders or frequent use of substances other than N2O and cocaine, respectively. Results: 128 patients with a N2O use disorder were included in the total sample and a subgroup of 77 N2O-only users was propensity-score matched on age and sex to 77 cocaine-only users. N2O users were typically young (mean age 26.2 years), male (66.4%), unmarried (82.9%), with a low education level (59.0%) and born in the Netherlands (88.2%), with parents born in Morocco (45.3%). N2O was used intermittently (median 10 days/month, IQR 4.0–17.5 days) and often in very large quantities (median 5 kg [ca. 750 balloons] per average using day, IQR 2–10 kg). Compared to the patients with a cocaine use disorder, matched N2O users were lower educated, more often from Moroccan descent, and less likely to be alcohol or polysubstance users. Despite receiving similar treatments, N2O users were twice as likely to discontinue treatment before completion compared to cocaine users (63 vs. 35%, p = 0.004). Conclusion: Treatment-seeking problematic N2O users are demographically different from treatment-seeking problematic cocaine users and are much more likely to dropout from psychological treatment. Further research is needed into the needs and other factors of problematic N2O users that relate to poor treatment adherence in problematic N2O users.
This study explores variables that predict physical violence in 614 (forensic) psychiatric inpatients. All violent incidents that occurred in a Dutch forensic psychiatric hospital between 2014 and 2019 (N = 3,713) were coded with the Modified Overt Aggression Scale+ based on daily hospital reports and patients’ medical records. Binary logistic regression analyses examined which patient variables could differentiate between patients with and without physical violence during treatment and between patients with single and multiple incidents of physical violence. Variables included in the analyses were gender, legal status, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, schizophrenia spectrum disorder, psychopathy (Psychopathy Checklist–Revised [PCL-R] score), self-harm during treatment, impulsivity, intellectual disability, and length of stay. A clear association was found between self-harm and inpatient physical violence on all outcome measures and in all analyses. Adequate monitoring of self-harm is advised as a strategy to early identify patients with a high risk to threaten ward safety.
MULTIFILE
