PowerPoint presentation used at the 6th International Conference of Indonesia Forestry Researchers - Stream 2 Managing Forest and Natural Resources, Meeting Sustainable and Friendly Use 7-8 September 2021, Bogor, Indonesia.
MULTIFILE
The conservation of our heritage buildings is a European wide policy objective. Historical buildings are not only works of art, but embody an important source of local identity and form a connection to our past. Protection agencies aim to preserve historical qualities for future generations. Their work is guided by restoration theory, a philosophy developed and codified in the course of the 19th and 20th century. European covenants, such as the Venice Charter, express shared views on the conservation and restoration of built heritage. Today, many users expect a building with modern comfort as well as a historical appearance. Moreover, new functionality is needed for building types that have outlived their original function. For example, how to reuse buildings such as old prisons, military barracks, factories, or railway stations? These new functions and new demands pose a challenge to restoration design and practices. Another, perhaps conflicting EU policy objective is the reduction of energy use in the built environment, in order to reach climate policy goals. Roughly 40% of the consumption of energy takes place in buildings, either in the production or consumption phase. However, energy efficiency is especially difficult to achieve in the case of historical buildings, because of strict regulations aimed at protecting historical values. Recently, there has been growing interest in energy efficient restoration practices in the Netherlands, as is shown by the 'energy-neutral' restoration of Villa Diederichs in Utrecht, the 'Boostencomplex' in Maastricht and De Tempel in The Hague. Although restoration of listed buildings is obviously focused on the preservation of historical values, with the pressing demands from EU climate policy the energy efficiency of historical building
MULTIFILE
Worldwide, coral reefs are rapidly declining due to increased sea water temperatures and other environmental stresses (Figure 1). To counter the extinction of major coral reef building species on the island of Bonaire, the non-profit organization Reef Renewal Foundation Bonaire is restoring degraded reef sites using corals that are grown in local nurseries. In these nurseries, corals are propagated on artificial trees using fragmentation. After 6-8 months of growth in the nursery, the corals are transplanted to degraded reef sites around the island. Over the years more than 21.000 corals have been outplanted to reef restoration sites in this way. These corals show high survivorship under natural reef conditions but remain under threat by environmental disturbances, such as increased water temperatures, diseases, and competition with macroalgae. A promising intervention to increase reef persistence and resilience is to manipulate the coral-associated microbiome. At present, the composition of the microbiome in nursery-reared and outplanted corals on Bonaire is unknown. The aim of the current project is to identify and isolate naturally occurring beneficial bacteria that may stimulate the resilience of these corals. Our key objectives are: 1) to assess the presence of functionally beneficial bacteria in corals in nursery and restoration sites on Bonaire using metagenomic screening. 2) to design culture strategies to isolate these functionally beneficial bacteria. In the future, a selection of these beneficial bacteria can be applied to the corals to increase their resilience against environmental disturbances.
De koraalriffen van de Caribisch Nederlandse eilanden St. Eustatius en Saba zijn van groot ecologisch en economisch belang. Door een opeenstapeling van bedreigingen is de hoeveelheid driedimensionale structuur op het rif afgenomen en zijn herbivore sleutelsoorten verdwenen. Het rif wordt overwoekerd met algen, die nieuwe koraalaanwas bemoeilijken. Lokale natuurbeheerorganisaties STENAPA en SCF willen artificiële riffen inzetten, om het ecosysteem door middel van “Building with Nature” te herstellen. Artificiële riffen worden wereldwijd in toenemende mate gebruikt, maar de doeltreffendheid hangt in sterke mate af van hoe er rekening is gehouden met de lokale omstandigheden en doelstellingen. Als de riffen goed functioneren kunnen sleutelsoorten herstellen en kan koraal zich weer vestigen. De natuurbeheerorganisaties willen weten hoe artificiële riffen optimaal bij kunnen dragen aan het herstel van het koraalrif ecosysteem bij St. Eustatius en op de Saba bank. Van Hall Larenstein, STENAPA, SCF, IMARES, CNSI en Golden Rock Dive Centre werken samen in het AROSSTA (Artificial Reefs on Saba and Statia) project om deze vraag te beantwoorden. Hiervoor worden verschillende soorten artificiële riffen gebouwd van lokaal natuursteen en van veelgebruikte “reef balls”. De functionaliteit van de verschillende soorten artificiële riffen wordt bepaald door gedurende 1,5 jaar de vestiging van zee-egels, vissen en koraal te onderzoeken. Na afloop van dit project zal duidelijk zijn welk type artificieel rif het meest geschikt is voor beide onderzoeklocaties. Daarnaast is bekend wat het effect is van het gebruikte materiaal en het aanbrengen van extra schuilplaatsen op de functie van artificiële riffen. Tenslotte wordt inzicht gegeven in hoeverre artificiële riffen een bijdrage leveren aan het herstel van aangrenzende gebieden. Omdat het onderzoek uitgevoerd wordt op twee locaties, met contrasterende omstandigheden, zullen de resultaten van regionaal belang zijn om bestaande en toekomstige artificiële riffen optimaal te laten functioneren.
The Dutch main water systems face pressing environmental, economic and societal challenges due to climatic changes and increased human pressure. There is a growing awareness that nature-based solutions (NBS) provide cost-effective solutions that simultaneously provide environmental, social and economic benefits and help building resilience. In spite of being carefully designed and tested, many projects tend to fail along the way or never get implemented in the first place, wasting resources and undermining trust and confidence of practitioners in NBS. Why do so many projects lose momentum even after a proof of concept is delivered? Usually, failure can be attributed to a combination of eroding political will, societal opposition and economic uncertainties. While ecological and geological processes are often well understood, there is almost no understanding around societal and economic processes related to NBS. Therefore, there is an urgent need to carefully evaluate the societal, economic, and ecological impacts and to identify design principles fostering societal support and economic viability of NBS. We address these critical knowledge gaps in this research proposal, using the largest river restoration project of the Netherlands, the Border Meuse (Grensmaas), as a Living Lab. With a transdisciplinary consortium, stakeholders have a key role a recipient and provider of information, where the broader public is involved through citizen science. Our research is scientifically innovative by using mixed methods, combining novel qualitative methods (e.g. continuous participatory narrative inquiry) and quantitative methods (e.g. economic choice experiments to elicit tradeoffs and risk preferences, agent-based modeling). The ultimate aim is to create an integral learning environment (workbench) as a decision support tool for NBS. The workbench gathers data, prepares and verifies data sets, to help stakeholders (companies, government agencies, NGOs) to quantify impacts and visualize tradeoffs of decisions regarding NBS.
