The range of studies that has been conducted on the role of gossip in organizations suggests that gossip in the workplace plays a variety of important roles in organisational processes. However, relatively few studies have explored its role in intercultural situations. This is surprising given how organisations are becoming increasingly diverse. This paper addresses this gap in the literature. It reports on an exploratory project that sought to determine how perceptions of organisational gossip vary between members of different cultural groups. Using a sensemaking, interpretative approach, we showed two gossip scenarios to 8 Chinese, 8 German and 8 Dutch first year students, and conducted semi structured interviews, asking them how they perceived the nature of the gossip, the gossiper and the object of gossip (i.e., the person being gossiped about). After analysing the data with ATLAS.ti, we observed certain patterns emerging. For example, while all students condemned a manager’s bad behaviour, the Chinese students seemed to expect it more than did their Dutch or German counterparts. Moreover, we found that the relationship and amount of trust that exists between gossiper, listener and object of gossip greatly influenced how the gossiper and object of gossip were perceived. After reflecting on our research methodology, this study sets the stage for the next phase of our research on the role of gossip in intercultural situations. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dominiquedarmon/
In dit essay wordt een boek van B. Buunk besproken. Buunk betoogd dat gedrag in organisaties voorkomt uit de oerdriften die de mens in zijn evolutie als groepsdier ontwikkeld heeft. Emans bespreekt de betekenis van het werk van Buunk voor het vakgebied HRM. De conclusie is dat HRM de menselijke oerdriften en hun consequenties nog wel eens over het hoofd ziet; dit betekent dat HRM kansen laat liggen.
