This paper presents three lesson activities for upper secondary and higher education that focus on learning by constructing an interactive qualitative representation. By constructing the representation learners learn domain knowledge as well as general system thinking skills. The learning goals and the pedagogical approach are described.
This doctoral dissertation aims to address the challenges faced by physical education (PE) teachers in building an inclusive learning environment that promotes a physically active lifestyle among secondary school students. Although existing research offers useful empirical insights into addressing this complexity, successfully implementing these insights in the dynamic PE context remains challenging. It is recommended to develop tools that bridge the gap between theory and practice and provide guidelines for teachers to effectively embrace the diverse needs of students. Advancements in technology have created new opportunities for developing digital tools for CPD. In the field of PE, a variety of technologies (e.g., exergames, wearables) have been developed and are currently used. However, there is a scarcity of studies focusing on technology that primarily supports teachers in enhancing skills, knowledge, and expertise (i.e., CPD) rather than improving student learning. While the potential benefits of technological tools in PE have been recognized, their successful implementation remains complex. Therefore, this doctoral dissertation, grounded in the fields of social psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and design research, aims to (i) gain insights into the motivational perceptions and needs of students within secondary school PE, (ii) examine how the teacher can meet these motivational needs and (iii) explore how technology can be better utilized to support teachers in building an optimal motivational PE class climate. Therefore, the following research questions were formulated: 1. What are the differences and similarities in students’ motivational perceptions and needs in secondary school PE? 2. How can PE teachers meet the motivational needs of all students in secondary school PE? 3. What is the affordance of technology in supporting teachers in the PE context? The first study (chapter 2) focused on identifying distinct motivational profiles among secondary school students based on their perceptions of the PE environment. Building upon the first study, the second study (chapter 3) qualitatively examined students preferred motivational teaching strategies in secondary school PE. In our third study (chapter 4) we investigated the impact of potential motivating teaching strategies on students’ motivation in a secondary school PE context. These three studies yielded valuable insights into the motivational perceptions and needs of students in secondary school PE. It was demonstrated that students exhibit varied perceptions of the motivational climate in PE. However, despite these differences, it was discovered that students across different motivational profiles share similar motivational needs. Several teaching strategies within the dimensions of the TARGET framework were identified which are potentially beneficial for all secondary school students’ motivation. Yet, the implementation of these motivating TARGET teaching strategies in PE is challenging for teachers. Therefore, in the last two studies, we explored the affordance of technology in supporting teachers in the PE context. Study four (chapter 5) aimed to examine how the evidence-based theoretical TARGET framework for creating a motivating PE learning climate might be embedded into a digital professional development tool for PE teachers. A multidisciplinary team of researchers, designers, and end-users iteratively went through several phases of need identification, idea generation, designing, development, and testing. By using a participatory approach, the TARGET-tool for PE teachers was developed. In the fifth study (chapter six) we explored the applicability of the completed TARGET-tool in a secondary school PE context. The perceived usability of the tool was examined and we gained insights into the process of teachers’ professional development as a result of using the tool. In the last chapter (chapter 7), the main findings of the dissertation are discussed thematically in light of the overarching research questions and their empirical, methodological, and artefactual contributions. The three research questions are addressed to provide a comprehensive understanding of how to effectively support teachers in optimizing the motivational learning climate in secondary school PE and the potential facilitative role of technology in this process.
LINK
Introduction: Youth activity guideline compliance is generally low across most western countries and Dutch youth are no exception to this. Thirty-two percent of 4-11 year old boys and girls, and 15% of 12-17 year olds are currently meeting the physical activity (PA) guideline recommendations of one hour of daily moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) (Hildebrandt, Ooijendijk, & Hopman Rock, 2008). Physical education (PE) has been attributed an important role in providing young people with physical activity (Kahn, et al., 2002). If sufficiently active, PE lessons could contribute to physical activity levels in youth. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the overall intensity of Dutch primary and secondary school physical education (PE) lessons and the influence of various lesson characteristics on these intensity levels. Methods: Heart rates were measured using the Polar Team System in a nationally distributed sample of 913 students in 40 schools (20 primary schools and 20 secondary schools) in the Netherlands. A total of 106 lessons were assessed, with 10 students per class (5 boys and 5 girls) wearing a heart rate monitor for the duration of their PE class. Teachers were asked not to deviate from their regular PE program and to carry out their lessons as they had planned. None of the lessons had a specifically planned physical activity intensity focus. Results: Overall percentages lesson time in MVPA were 46.7% and 40.1% during primary school and secondary school PE respectively. Primary school students engaged in significantly more MVPA than did secondary school students (t (890) = 4.635, p<.001). Furthermore, results indicated a sharp decline in girls' PE intensity levels in secondary school, where boys were more active than girls (F (1,912) = 9,58, p<.01). Subsequent analyses of lesson content in secondary school students indicated that girls were less active during teamgames, but not during individual activities or lessons with a mixed subject (both teamgames and individual activities) (45.7% vs. 34.7% F (3,451) = 16.31, p<.001, figure 1). Discussion: Our results show that one PE lesson roughly accounts for one-third of the daily amount of physical activity as prescribed by activity guidelines. Furthermore, previous research has shown that by including lesson intensity as an additional lesson goal it is relatively simple to increase lesson intensity (Verstraete, Cardon, De Clercq, & De Bourdeaudhuij, 2007). Therefore, increasing lesson intensity combined with increasing the number of weekly PE lessons seems an effective strategy to increase youth physical activity through PE. However, given the curricular and time constraints in most schools, PE should not be seen as a stand-alone solution for combating inactivity. Combined with other school-based PA opportunities (active transport, active breaks) however, PE could make a meaningful contribution to daily PA in youth. Finally, the high prevalence of coeducational teamgames (61% of all lessons) in the Dutch secondary school PE curricula might prevent girls from attaining similar physical activity levels to boys during PE. Therefore, more research is needed on maximising secondary school girls' participation during teamgames.
