When teaching grammar, one of the biggest challenges teachers face is how to make their students achieve conceptual understanding. Some scholars have argued that metaconcepts from theoretical linguistics should be used to pedagogically and conceptually enrich traditional L1 grammar teaching, generating more opportunities for conceptual understanding. However, no empirical evidence exists to support this theoretical position. The current study is the first to explore the role of linguistic metaconcepts in the grammatical reasoning of university students of Dutch Language and Literature. Its goal was to gain a better understanding of the characteristics of students’ grammatical conceptual knowledge and reasoning and to investigate whether students’ reasoning benefits from an intervention that related linguistic metaconcepts to concepts from traditional grammar. Results indicate, among other things, that using explicit linguistic metaconcepts and explicit concepts from traditional grammar is a powerful contributor to the quality of students’ grammatical reasoning. Moreover, the intervention significantly improved students’ use of linguistic metaconcepts.
Leren is een actief proces waarin kennis wordt geconstrueerd. Dit proces is voor iedere leerling anders en vraagt individuele ondersteuning. Onderwijsmaterialen en werkvormen zouden zich gedurende het leerproces steeds moeten aanpassen aan de specifieke behoefte van elke leerling. Ontwikkelingen in het veld van de Kunstmatige Intelligentie & Onderwijs zijn ondertussen zodanig vergevorderd dat interactieve software deze kennisconstructie van leerlingen inderdaad individueel en adequaat kan ondersteunen. Lector Didactiek van de Bètavakken dr. Bert Bredeweg bespreekt in zijn rede de kracht van interactieve kennisrepresentaties als medium voor kennisconstructie. Als voorbeeld zal hij ingaan op conceptueel modelleren als didactische vorm voor het creëren van kennis over het gedrag van dynamische systemen. Hij zal ook illustreren hoe slimme softwarecomponenten individuele leerlingen naar behoefte kunnen ondersteunen bij dit leerproces.
L1 grammar teaching worldwide often takes the form of traditional grammar teaching with decontextualized parsing exercises and rules of thumb. Some researchers have proposed enriching such forms of grammar teaching by relating traditional grammatical concepts to underlying metaconcepts from linguistic theory. The merits of such an approach have become apparent in recent intervention studies, but the question remains how teachers perceive such forms of grammar teaching, which is of particular importance for curriculum development. The present study investigated Dutch teachers’ beliefs in focus groups and a national survey (N = 127). It is found that Dutch language teachers see important benefits of a metaconceptual approach to grammar teaching, particularly as a means to improve students’ grammatical understanding. However, results also indicate that while teachers may see clear pedagogical and conceptual advantages of working based on underlying metaconcepts, their own teaching practice appears to be much more traditional. This discrepancy is explained by assuming that contextual factors have a restraining effect on what teachers can or want to do in reality. Once such contextual factors no longer play a part, teachers’ views tend to be much more geared towards a metaconceptual approach. The paper concludes with some implications for future research.
