Purpose: To evaluate the effects of a combination of wheelchair mobility skills (WMS) training and exercise training on physical activity (PA), WMS, confidence in wheelchair mobility, and physical fitness. Methods: Youth using a manual wheelchair (n = 60) participated in this practice-based intervention, with a waiting list period (16 weeks), exercise training (8 weeks), WMS training (8 weeks), and follow-up (16 weeks). Repeated measures included: PA (Activ8), WMS (Utrecht Pediatric Wheelchair Mobility Skills Test), confidence in wheelchair mobility (Wheelchair Mobility Confidence Scale), and physical fitness (cardiorespiratory fitness, (an)aerobic performance) and were analysed per outcome parameter using a multilevel model analyses. Differences between the waiting list and training period were determined with an unpaired sample t-test. Results: Multilevel model analysis showed significant positive effects for PA (p = 0.01), WMS (p < 0.001), confidence in wheelchair mobility (p < 0.001), aerobic (p < 0.001), and anaerobic performance (p < 0.001). Unpaired sample t-tests underscored these effects for PA (p < 0.01) and WMS (p < 0.001). There were no effects on cardiorespiratory fitness. The order of training (exercise before WMS) had a significant effect on confidence in wheelchair mobility. Conclusions: A combination of exercise and WMS training appears to have significant positive long-term effects on PA, WMS, confidence in wheelchair mobility, and (an)aerobic performance in youth using a manual wheelchair.Implications for rehabilitationExercise training and wheelchair mobility skills (WMS) training can lead to a sustained improvement in physical activity (PA) in youth using a manual wheelchair.These combined trainings can also lead to a sustained increase in WMS, confidence in wheelchair mobility, and (an)aerobic performance.More attention is needed in clinical practice and in research towards improving PA in youth using a manual wheelchair.
Background: A consistent finding in the literature is the decline in physical activity during adolescence, resulting in activity levels below the recommended guidelines. Therefore, promotion of physical activity is recommended specifically for prevocational students.Objective: This protocol paper describes the background and design of a physical activity promotion intervention study in which prevocational students are invited to participate in the design and implementation of an intervention mix. The intervention is expected to prevent a decline in physical activity in the target group.Methods: The effectiveness of the intervention was evaluated in a two-group cluster randomized controlled trial with assessments at baseline and 2-year follow-up. A simple randomization was applied, allocating 11 schools to the intervention group and 11 schools to the control group, which followed the regular school curriculum. The research population consisted of 3003 prevocational students, aged 13-15 years. The primary outcome measures were self-reported physical activity levels (screen time, active commuting, and physical activity). As a secondary outcome, direct assessment of physical fitness (leg strength, arm strength, hip flexibility, hand speed, abdominal muscle strength, BMI, and body composition) was included. An intervention-control group comparison was presented for the baseline results. The 2-year interventions began by mapping the assets of the prevocational adolescents of each intervention school using motivational interviewing in the structured interview matrix and the photovoice method. In addition, during focus group sessions, students, school employees, and researchers cocreated and implemented an intervention plan that optimally met the students’ assets and opportunities in the school context. The degree of student participation was evaluated through interviews and questionnaires.Results: Data collection of the SALVO (stimulating an active lifestyle in prevocational students) study began in October 2015 and was completed in December 2017. Data analyses will be completed in 2021. Baseline comparisons between the intervention and control groups were not significant for age (P=.12), screen time behavior (P=.53), nonschool active commuting (P=.26), total time spent on sports activities (P=.32), total physical activities (P=.11), hip flexibility (P=.22), maximum handgrip (P=.47), BMI (P=.44), and sum of skinfolds (P=.29). Significant differences between the intervention and control groups were found in ethnicity, gender, active commuting to school (P=.03), standing broad jump (P=.02), bent arm hang (P=.01), 10× 5-m sprint (P=.01), plate tapping (P=.01), sit-ups (P=.01), and 20-m shuttle run (P=.01).Conclusions: The SALVO study assesses the effects of a participatory intervention on physical activity and fitness levels in prevocational students. The results of this study may lead to a new understanding of the effectiveness of school-based physical activity interventions when students are invited to participate and cocreate an intervention. This process would provide structured health promotion for future public health.
MULTIFILE
Background The purpose of this study is to describe feasibility and test–retest reliability of the six-minute walking distance test (6MWD) and an adapted shuttle run test (aSRT) in persons with severe intellectual and sensory (multiple) disabilities. Materials and Methods Forty-seven persons with severe multiple disabilities, with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) grade I and II and wearing a heart rate monitor, performed the 6MWD and the aSRT twice. Results Ninety-six per cent of the participants completed both tests successfully. Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed no significant differences between test and retest (P < 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficients for all variables were ≥0.90. Limits of agreement for aSRT in GMFCS II subjects were insufficient. Conclusion Six-minute walking distance test is feasible and reliable for measuring functional exercise capacity in GMFCS I and II participants with severe multiple disabilities. aSRT is feasible and reliable for measuring aerobic capacity in GMFCS I participants. Compared with others, participants with severe multiple disabilities achieved poor results in 6MWD.
Een beroerte is de belangrijkste oorzaak van invaliditeit in Nederland. Revalidatie van mensen die een beroerte hebben gehad, is erop gericht hen zo zelfstandig mogelijk in hun eigen omgeving te laten functioneren. Vaak zijn er na de revalidatie nog altijd gevolgen van een beroerte, die het zelfstandig functioneren bemoeilijken. Mensen die een beroerte overleven houden er vaak chronische gevolgen aan over, zoals loop- en balansproblemen, verhoogd valrisico, vermoeidheid en depressie. Deze problemen bij thuiswonende mensen met een beroerte resulteren vaak in een inactieve leefstijl. Dit leidt tot een neerwaartse spiraal waarin de fysieke activiteit steeds verder afneemt, patiënten steeds verder deconditioneren, de verzorgingsbehoefte toe- en de mate van zelfstandigheid afneemt en het risico op een volgende beroerte toeneemt. Studies laten zien dat fysieke activiteit een positief effect op gezondheid heeft van patiënten na beroerte. De technologie om fysieke activiteit betrouwbaar en valide te meten is aanwezig en er is inzicht in belemmerende en faciliterende factoren voor fysieke activiteit. Er is echter nog geen bewezen effectieve interventie voor het aanleren en behouden van een fysiek actieve leefstijl voor patiënten na beroerte. Omdat alle richtlijnen voor beroerte aangeven dat het belangrijk is dat patiënten na beroerte fysiek actief zijn, vragen fysiotherapeuten zich af hoe krijgen en houden wij patiënten na een beroerte actief, dus hoe krijgen wij een actieve leefstijl bij een patiënt? Deze praktijkvraag is “vertaald” naar de volgende onderzoeksvraag: Wat is het effect van een beweegstimuleringsinterventie bij thuiswonende patiënten na beroerte op fysieke activiteit en aerobe capaciteit? Deze onderzoeksvraag wordt in drie stappen uitgewerkt: 1. Het ontwikkelen van een veldtest om aerobe capaciteit te meten in de praktijk, 2 Het ontwikkelen van een interventie gericht op het (langdurig) bevorderen van een fysiek actieve leefstijl; 3. Het testen van de feasibility van de interventie in een pilot studie.