Literatuur-/praktijkoverzicht waarin een korte indruk wordt gegeven van de state-of-the-art op de vlakken: computational thinking, Lego WeDo en adaptieve technologie.
DOCUMENT
The methodology of biomimicry design thinking is based on and builds upon the overarching patterns that all life abides by. “Cultivating cooperative relationships” within an ecosystem is one such pattern we as humans can learn from to nurture our own mutualistic and symbiotic relationships. While form and process translations from biology to design have proven accessible by students learning biomimicry, the realm of translating biological functions in a systematic approach has proven to be more difficult. This study examines how higher education students can approach the gap that many companies in transition are struggling with today; that of thinking within the closed loops of their own ecosystem, to do good without damaging the system itself. Design students should be able to assess and advise on product design choices within such systems after graduation. We know when tackling a design challenge, teams have difficulties sifting through the mass of information they encounter, and many obstacles are encountered by students and their professional clients when trying to implement systems thinking into their design process. While biomimicry offers guidelines and methodology, there is insufficient research on complex, systems-level problem solving that systems thinking biomimicry requires. This study looks at factors found in course exercises, through student surveys and interviews that helped (novice) professionals initiate systems thinking methods as part of their strategy. The steps found in this research show characteristics from student responses and matching educational steps which enabled them to develop their own approach to challenges in a systems thinking manner. Experiences from the 2022 cohort of the semester “Design with Nature” within the Industrial Design Engineering program at The Hague University of Applied Sciences in the Netherlands have shown that the mixing and matching of connected biological design strategies to understand integrating functions and relationships within a human system is a promising first step. Stevens LL, Whitehead C, Singhal A. Cultivating Cooperative Relationships: Identifying Learning Gaps When Teaching Students Systems Thinking Biomimicry. Biomimetics. 2022; 7(4):184. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7040184
DOCUMENT
Toekomstige professionals moeten complexe problemen kunnen oplossen. Hoeleren we dit hbo-studenten? Design thinking en ontwerpgericht onderzoek bieden beiden dezelfde logica voor het ontwerpen van onderbouwde oplossingenvoor complexe problemen. Ze verschillen in accent, met name in inhoudelijke uitgangspunten en de organisatie van het ontwerpproces. Zowel design thinkingals ontwerpgericht onderzoek zijn geschikt voor het oplossen van complexeproblemen, zeker als hun sterke punten in opeenvolgende ontwerpcycli wordengecombineerd.
DOCUMENT
Preliminary empirical research conducted by the leading author has shown that design students using biological analogies, or models across different contexts, often misinterpreted these, intentionally or unintentionally, during design. By copying shape or form without integrating the main function of the mimicked biological model, students failed to consider the process or system directing that function when attempting to solve the design need. This article considers the first step in the development of an applicable educational model using distant analogies from nature, by means of biomimicry thinking methodology. The analysis examines results from a base-line exercise taken by students in the Minor Design with Nature during the Spring semester of Industrial Design Engineering at The Hague University of Applied Sciences in 2019, verifying that students without biomimicry training use this hollow approach automatically. This research confirms the gap between where students are at the beginning of the semester and where they need to be as expert sustainable designers when they graduate. These findings provide a starting point for future interventions in biomimicry workshops to improve systematic design thinking through structural and scientifically based iterations of analogical reasoning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09574-1 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/helenkopnina/
MULTIFILE
Societal transitions require activities of multiple stakeholders on different systemic levels. Designers and design researchers are often involved in supporting specific interventions and sometimes in enabling and facilitating entire processes. Practices and literature in ‘co-creation ecosystems’ are a developing field for them to discuss differences and relatedness of micro-, meso- and macro perspectives. Using the case of a three-year multi-stakeholder co-creation project in the retail industry, the paper analyses processes and principles for making impact in design-led transition projects. A transition process with three phases is constructed and four principles for making impact at the various levels were found. Comparing findings with the UK Design Council’s ‘Systemic Design Framework’, the paper suggests process adaptations to scale between the local and the sector/national level. It also contributes to a better understanding of systemic design principles like Leadership, Storytelling and Systems Thinking. LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/christine-de-lille-8039372/?originalSubdomain=nl https://www.linkedin.com/in/overdiek12345/
DOCUMENT
Business model innovation is essential to drive the systemic change required for a new economy. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide focus and direction towards this transition. For companies in the agriculture and horticulture sectors, SDG 12, Responsible Consumption and Production, is particularly relevant. Designing, renewing, and innovating business models requires courageous and creative leadership. A new business model involves more than just analyzing problems and making well-considered decisions. It’s about creating something new, discovering innovative solutions, and testing them in practice. Design thinking is a method well-suited to addressing complex challenges that do not yet have clear solutions, such as the societal issues that characterize this era of transition. In this publication, the method is applied to real-world challenges faced by entrepreneurs in the agricultural and horticultural value chain. The iterative nature of design thinking leads to unexpected and innovative outcomes. This creative approach makes a valuable contribution to the realization of SDG 12.
MULTIFILE
In many schools teaching learners is conducted in isolation, and often, so is teachers’ learning. Isolation hinders shared practices; it creates a key challenge for those in middle leadership roles who must foster collaborative professional development. This study examines how a system perspective empowers aspiring middle leaders to develop their capacity for teacher leadership – leading instructional improvement through expertise and collaboration rather than formal authority. Participants (n = 10), all experienced teachers in a Dutch master’s programme preparing them for middle leadership positions, engaged with two tools: causal loop diagrams (CLDs) to map systemic interactions, and the ‘Colours of Change’ model to strategize interventions. Findings indicate that adopting a system perspective enhanced participants’ diagnostic capability, strategic thinking, and confidence as change agents. This study positions systems thinking tools as practical means to develop the teacher leadership capacities essential for middle leaders to navigate complex educational environments and drive sustainable improvement.
DOCUMENT
We developed an application which allows learners to construct qualitative representations of dynamic systems to aid them in learning subject content knowledge and system thinking skills simultaneously. Within this application, we implemented a lightweight support function which automatically generates help from a norm-representation to aid learners as they construct these qualitative representations. This support can be expected to improve learning. Using this function it is not necessary to define in advance possible errors that learners may make and the subsequent feedback. Also, no data from (previous) learners is required. Such a lightweight support function is ideal for situations where lessons are designed for a wide variety of topics for small groups of learners. Here, we report on the use and impact of this support function in two lessons: Star Formation and Neolithic Age. A total of 63 ninth-grade learners from secondary school participated. The study used a pretest/intervention/post-test design with two conditions (no support vs. support) for both lessons. Learners with access to the support create better representations, learn more subject content knowledge, and improve their system thinking skills. Learners use the support throughout the lessons, more often than they would use support from the teacher. We also found no evidence for misuse, i.e., 'gaming the system', of the support function.
DOCUMENT
Biomimicry education is grounded in a set of natural design principles common to every known lifeform on Earth. These Life’s Principles (LPs) (cc Biomimicry 3.8), provide guidelines for emulating sustainable strategies that are field-tested over nearly four billion years of evolution. This study evaluates an exercise for teaching LPs to interdisciplinary students at three universities, Arizona State University (ASU) in Phoenix, Arizona (USA), College of Charleston (CofC) in Charleston, South Carolina (USA) and The Hague University of Applied Sciences (THUAS) in The Hague (The Netherlands) during the spring 2021 semester. Students researched examples of both biological organisms and human designs exhibiting the LPs. We gauged the effectiveness of the exercise through a common rubric and a survey to discover ways to improve instruction and student understanding. Increased student success was found to be directly linked to introducing the LPs with illustrative examples, assigning an active search for examples as part of the exercise, and utilizing direct assessment feedback loops. Requiring students to highlight the specific terms of the LP sub-principles in each example is a suggested improvement to the instructions and rubric. An iterative, face-to-face, discussion-based teaching and learning approach helps overcome minor misunderstandings. Reiterating the LPs throughout the semester with opportunities for application will highlight the potential for incorporating LPs into students’ future sustainable design process. Stevens LL, Fehler M, Bidwell D, Singhal A, Baumeister D. Building from the Bottom Up: A Closer Look into the Teaching and Learning of Life’s Principles in Biomimicry Design Thinking Courses. Biomimetics. 2022; 7(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7010025
DOCUMENT
