The field of applied linguistics is increasingly adopting open science practices. As open access publication gains traction, ethical issues emerge that need to be addressed by the field. This viewpoint paper addresses the concern that open science is not equally open for everyone. This paper describes how open access publication is increasingly being commercialized and explains how open access publication coincides with systemic inequality. We offer the following viewpoints for the field to consider:1.) We are morally obligated to make our research output accessible.2.) Hybrid, Gold, and Green open access publishing lead to systemic inequality in open access publishing, benefiting commercial publishers and those working in research-intensive universities and rich countries.3.)Diamond open access publication removes the systemic inequalities; hence, Diamond open access should be prioritized over Hybrid, Gold, and Green open access publication models.4.)We should move away from publish-and-read agreements and Green open access publishing, because they prevent system change.5.)Through our choices in our work as researchers, editors, reviewers, authors and teachers, we can contribute to the transition towards truly equitable open access publishing practices.6.)Senior researchers are in the position and have the moral obligation to be drivers of these changes.
DOCUMENT
This book offers a comprehensive, practice-based exploration of Systemic Co-Design (SCD) as it is applied to society’s most complex and urgent transitions. Drawing on collaborative projects from the Expertisenetwork Systemic Co-Design (ESC), it portrays Systemic Co-Design not as a fixed framework but as a reflexive, evolving practice. The chapters present diverse collaborations and inquiries, ranging from inclusive design and digital accessibility to fostering safety cultures and urban co-creation, that illustrate Systemic Co-Design’s capacity to build awareness, trust, and communities, as well as systemic capabilities. The book promotes mutual learning and generates knowledge products such as maps, canvases, cards, games, and embodied interactions that enable meaningful engagement. Key themes that run throughout include continuous reflection, the blending of action research and design experimentation, and collective sense-making across disciplines. The contributions demonstrate how new values, methods, and communities are co-developed with design practitioners, policymakers, educators, and citizens. Together, they demonstrate how Systemic Co-Design achieves practical outcomes while fostering the longterm capacities and cultural shifts necessary for systemic change.
LINK
PurposeAll entrepreneurs interact simultaneously with multiple entrepreneurial contexts throughout their entrepreneurial journey. This conceptual paper has two central aims: (1) it synthesises the current literature on gender and entrepreneurship, and (2) it increases our understanding of how gender norms, contextual embeddedness and (in)equality mechanisms interact within contexts. Illustrative contexts that are discussed include entrepreneurship education, business networks and finance.Design/methodology/approachThis conceptual paper draws upon extant literature to develop its proposed conceptual framework. It provides suggestions for systemic policy interventions as well as pointing to promising paths for future research.FindingsA literature-generated conceptual framework is developed to explain and address the systemic barriers faced by opportunity-driven women as they engage in entrepreneurial contexts. This conceptual framework visualises the interplay between gender norms, contextual embeddedness and inequality mechanisms to explain systemic disparities. An extra dimension is integrated in the framework to account for the power of agency within women and with others, whereby agency, either individually or collectively, may disrupt and subvert the current interplay with inequality mechanisms.Originality/valueThis work advances understanding of the underrepresentation of women entrepreneurs. The paper offers a conceptual framework that provides policymakers with a useful tool to understand how to intervene and increase contextual embeddedness for all entrepreneurs. Additionally, this paper suggests moving beyond “fixing” women entrepreneurs and points towards disrupting systemic disparities to accomplish this contextual embeddedness for all entrepreneurs. By doing so, this research adds to academic knowledge on the construction and reconstruction of gender in the field of entrepreneurship.
DOCUMENT
The transition to an inclusive society through design Inclusive design can play a critical role in shaping a more equitable society. When products and services are intentionally created to be inclusive, they become more accessible to a wide audience, including people who might otherwise struggle to engage with them. In this way, designers become agents of social transformation. The project Active Inclusive Design (AID) addresses this challenge directly. It aims to enhance the capabilities of professional and future designers to create inclusive products and services, both digital and non-digital. In doing so, it supports a responsible and digital society central to the Expertise network Systemic Co-design (ESC) agenda, and is closely connected to all ESC Dynamic Learning Agenda (DLA) themes: Systemic Co-Design (SCD) in me, SCD with others, SCD in reality and SCD in time.
LINK
The current study investigates the effects of the school lockdowns during school years 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 on the achievement scores of primary school students during the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed scores for spelling, reading fluency (i.e., decoding speed), reading comprehension, and mathematics from standardized student tracking systems for 5125 students from 26 primary schools in the urban region of The Hague, the Netherlands. Results showed that students in grades 1 through 3 had significant learning delays after the first lockdown. However, results after the second lockdown showed that most students were able to catch up, compared to students from corresponding grades of cohorts before COVID-19. The magnitude of these positive effects was mostly close to the negative effect of the first lockdown. Apparently, during the second lockdown, schools seemed better prepared and able to deliver more effective home schooling and online instruction. The hypothesis that students’ learning from a low SES home environment will suffer most from the school lockdowns could only partly be confirmed. SES effects at the individual level tended to be mitigated by negative effects of SES at the school level, making SES-related differences between schools less profound. The findings of this study offer a broader perspective to evaluate the effects of long-term school closures. Implications for educational practice and issues of inequality between students are discussed.
DOCUMENT
Het project SUSTainable Artistic INnovation (SUSTAIN) is een samenwerkingsproject tussen de Haagse Hogeschool en Avans Hogeschool. Het onderzoek is uitgevoerd door Jacco van Uden (lector Verandermanagement) en Kim Caarls van De Haagse Hogeschool; en Godelieve Spaas (lector Gemeenschappelijke Economie), Olga Mink en Marga Rotteveel van Avans Hogeschool. Daarnaast hebben we nauw samengewerkt met zes Spacemakers: Art Partner, Circus Andersom, Future of Work, In4Art, V2_ en Waag. SUSTAIN onderzoekt de rol van Spacemakers: partijen die willen bijdragen aan systemische verandering door ruimte te creëren voor kunst op ongebruikelijke plekken, zoals binnen de economie, wetenschap of technologie. Het doel: met kunst werken aan een duurzame en rechtvaardige samenleving - ecologisch, economisch en sociaal. De verwachtingen van wat kunst kan betekenen in andere sferen dan de kunstwereld zelf zijn soms hooggespannen. Bijvoorbeeld wanneer we claimen dat kunst de motor van innovatie en reflectie kan zijn. Maar de ervaring leert: kunst is geen panacee. Niet iedereen ziet of erkent de meerwaarde van kunst bij transitievraagstukken. En wanneer kunst wel aan tafel komt, weten we de ontregeling niet altijd werkzaam te maken. Kunstenaars onderzoeken het onbekende, stellen vragen bij wat logisch lijkt en verbinden schijnbaar ongelijksoortige elementen. Juist die kwaliteiten zijn van groot belang voor het realiseren van systeemtransities. Het is echter niet altijd gemakkelijk om toegang te krijgen tot de ruimtes waar kunstenaars een impact willen hebben. Met dit praktijkonderzoek biedt SUSTAIN meer inzicht in de precieze rol, werkwijze en toegevoegde waarde van Spacemakers in de te maken transitie. Het onderzoek en de resultaten dragen bij aan de verdere professionalisering van deze opkomende sector. Onderzocht is hoe Spacemaking-praktijken door de verschillende organisaties worden vormgegeven: - Waarom doen Spacemakers wat ze doen? - Wat zien zij als de belofte van kunst buiten de kunsten? - Hoe gaan zij concreet te werk in het maken van ruimte voor kunst? - Hoe gaan Spacemakers om met de spanningen die ontstaan als kunst zich in niet-kunstzaken gaat mengen en andersom? - Hoe gaan Spacemakers om met de ingewikkelde vraag naar meerwaarde of impact van kunst én van zichzelf als ruimtemakers? SUSTAIN heeft twee belangrijke resultaten opgeleverd: 1) De Spacemaker Toolbox, een praktische tool voor Spacemakers om hun werk te verkennen en intern te professionaliseren. Het gaat om vier modellen met een gebruiksaanwijzing. 2) The Spacemaker Stories, een serie cahiers waarin we de Spacemaker praktijk van een afstand bekijken en Spacemakers helpen duidelijker te verwoorden wat ze doen, waarom ze het doen, hoe ze het doen en welke waarde ze creëren. De vijf cahiers zijn: De Roeping (38 p.), De Belofte van Kunst (39 p.), De Spanning (49 p.), De Hulp (44 p.) en De Gift (30 p.).
MULTIFILE
Het project SUSTainable Artistic INnovation (SUSTAIN) is een samenwerkingsproject tussen de Haagse Hogeschool en Avans Hogeschool. Het onderzoek is uitgevoerd door Jacco van Uden (lector Verandermanagement) en Kim Caarls van De Haagse Hogeschool; en Godelieve Spaas (lector Gemeenschappelijke Economie), Olga Mink en Marga Rotteveel van Avans Hogeschool. Daarnaast hebben we nauw samengewerkt met zes Spacemakers: Art Partner, Circus Andersom, Future of Work, In4Art, V2_ en Waag. SUSTAIN onderzoekt de rol van Spacemakers: partijen die willen bijdragen aan systemische verandering door ruimte te creëren voor kunst op ongebruikelijke plekken, zoals binnen de economie, wetenschap of technologie. Het doel: met kunst werken aan een duurzame en rechtvaardige samenleving - ecologisch, economisch en sociaal. De verwachtingen van wat kunst kan betekenen in andere sferen dan de kunstwereld zelf zijn soms hooggespannen. Bijvoorbeeld wanneer we claimen dat kunst de motor van innovatie en reflectie kan zijn. Maar de ervaring leert: kunst is geen panacee. Niet iedereen ziet of erkent de meerwaarde van kunst bij transitievraagstukken. En wanneer kunst wel aan tafel komt, weten we de ontregeling niet altijd werkzaam te maken. Kunstenaars onderzoeken het onbekende, stellen vragen bij wat logisch lijkt en verbinden schijnbaar ongelijksoortige elementen. Juist die kwaliteiten zijn van groot belang voor het realiseren van systeemtransities. Het is echter niet altijd gemakkelijk om toegang te krijgen tot de ruimtes waar kunstenaars een impact willen hebben. Met dit praktijkonderzoek biedt SUSTAIN meer inzicht in de precieze rol, werkwijze en toegevoegde waarde van Spacemakers in de te maken transitie. Het onderzoek en de resultaten dragen bij aan de verdere professionalisering van deze opkomende sector. Onderzocht is hoe Spacemaking-praktijken door de verschillende organisaties worden vormgegeven: - Waarom doen Spacemakers wat ze doen? - Wat zien zij als de belofte van kunst buiten de kunsten? - Hoe gaan zij concreet te werk in het maken van ruimte voor kunst? - Hoe gaan Spacemakers om met de spanningen die ontstaan als kunst zich in niet-kunstzaken gaat mengen en andersom? - Hoe gaan Spacemakers om met de ingewikkelde vraag naar meerwaarde of impact van kunst én van zichzelf als ruimtemakers? SUSTAIN heeft twee belangrijke resultaten opgeleverd: 1) De Spacemaker Toolbox, een praktische tool voor Spacemakers om hun werk te verkennen en intern te professionaliseren. Het gaat om vier modellen met een gebruiksaanwijzing. 2) The Spacemaker Stories, een serie cahiers waarin we de Spacemaker praktijk van een afstand bekijken en Spacemakers helpen duidelijker te verwoorden wat ze doen, waarom ze het doen, hoe ze het doen en welke waarde ze creëren. De vijf cahiers zijn: De Roeping (38 p.), De Belofte van Kunst (39 p.), De Spanning (49 p.), De Hulp (44 p.) en De Gift (30 p.).
MULTIFILE
This article uses a study of the life-story narratives of former classmates of Dutch and Moluccan descent to argue that the constructionist approach to intersectionality, with its account of identity as a narrative construction rather than a practice of naming, offers better tools for answering questions concerning intersectional identity formation than a more systemic intersectional approach. The case study also highlights the importance of the quest for origins in narratives. It demonstrates that theories of intersectionality are not justified in subsuming the issue of belonging under the identity marker of ethnicity, when all identities are performatively produced in and through narrative enactments that include the precarious achievement of belonging. The case study demonstrates that if narrative accounts of a (singular or collective) life fail to achieve narrative closure regarding roots, attempts to trace routes are seriously hampered.
DOCUMENT
Anthropocentrism is the belief that value is focused on human beings and that all other beings are means to human ends. Related to anthropocentrism, humanism privileges the aim of improvement of human welfare. Humanism has underwritten efforts to expose social injustices and improve the welfare of all human beings. In relation to the environment, post-humanism can be defined by a number of characteristics. First, post-humanism exposes anthropocentrism as an attempt to ignore the behavior in which humans focus on themselves at the expanse of all other species. Second, post-humanism critiques exclusive moral focus on human inequalities in relation to environmental protection, emphasizing that inequality between species should remain within the scope of ethical consideration. Third, post-humanism exposes anthropocentrism as an inadequate basis for environmental action as it criticizes anthropocentrism as ethically wrong as well as pragmatically ineffective. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118924396 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/helenkopnina/
MULTIFILE
The SUSTainable Artistic INnovation (SUSTAIN) project is a collaborative project between The Hague University of Applied Sciences and Avans University of Applied Sciences. The research was conducted by Jacco van Uden (professor Change Management) and Kim Caarls of The Hague University of Applied Sciences; and Godelieve Spaas (professor Common Economics), Olga Mink and Marga Rotteveel of Avans University of Applied Sciences. We also worked closely with six Spacemakers: Art Partner, Circus Andersom, Future of Work, In4Art, V2_ and Waag. SUSTAIN explores the role of Spacemakers: parties that want to contribute to systemic change by creating space for art in unusual places, such as within the economy, science or technology. The aim: to use art to work towards a sustainable and just society - ecologically, economically and socially. Expectations of what art can do in spheres other than the art world itself are sometimes high. For example, when we claim that art can be the engine of innovation and reflection. But experience shows: art is no panacea. Not everyone sees or recognises the added value of art in transition issues. And when art does come to the table, we do not always manage to make the disruption work. Artists explore the unknown, question what seems logical and connect seemingly disparate elements. It is precisely these qualities that are key to achieving systemic transitions. However, it is not always easy to access the spaces where artists want to make an impact. With this practical research, SUSTAIN offers more insight into the exact role, method and added value of Spacemakers in the transition to be made. The research and results contribute to the further professionalisation of this emerging sector. Just how Spacemaking practices are shaped by different organisations was examined: - Why do Spacemakers do what they do? - What do they see as the promise of art outside the arts? - How do they specifically go about making space for art? - How do Spacemakers deal with the tensions that arise when art gets involved in non-art matters and vice versa? - How do Spacemakers deal with the complicated question of the added value or impact of art and of themselves as space makers? SUSTAIN has produced two key outcomes: 1) The Spacemaker Toolbox, a practical tool for Spacemakers to explore and professionalise their work internally. It involves four models with instructions for use. 2) The Spacemaker Stories, a series of cahiers in which we look at Spacemaker practice from a distance and help Spacemakers articulate more clearly what they do, why they do it, how they do it and what value they create. The five cahiers are: The Calling (38 p.), The Promise of Art (39 p.), The Tension (49 p.), The Help (44 p.) and The Gift (30 p.).
MULTIFILE
