Studenten opleiden tot professionals die kunnen leven en werken in de huidige complexe en diverse samenleving. Kunnen acteren met mensen van verschillende achtergronden en de verhoudingen in de wereld kennen. Wereldburgers opleiden die zelfbewust zijn en met een kritische en empathische blik naar de wereld om hen heen kijken. Zodat ze na hun opleiding professionals zijn die begrijpen dat onderwerpen door henzelf en anderen vanuit verschillende invalshoeken kunnen worden aangevlogen. En in staat zijn om oplossingen te vinden voor ingewikkelde vraagstukken. Dat is een leven lang leren! Aan die ontwikkeling draag jij als onderwijsprofessional, op jouw manier, bij. Maar, dat vraagt ook van jou om steeds meer te acteren op het snijvlak van de interne leeromgeving van school en een externe (leer)omgeving, waarbij het cocreëren met verschillende stakeholders steeds belangrijker wordt voor het slim vormgeven van leerprocessen. De afgelopen periode onderschrijft des te meer dat we in een sneltreinvaart toe bewegen naar het ‘nieuwe normaal’, waarbij van ons wordt verwacht om anders te werken én te denken. Ingesleten denk- en werkpatronen volstaan niet meer in onze internationale samenleving die steeds complexer en onvoorspelbaarder wordt. Je ontkomt pas aan die patronen door opnieuw te gaan denken, te leren afstand nemen van vooropgestelde ideeën over wat er zou moeten zijn en ontstane situaties als kansen voor ontwikkeling te zien. Juist in deze tijd is flexibilisering van het onderwijs en cocreatie hard nodig om bij te dragen aan het ‘nieuwe normaal’. Design Thinking is een gedachtegoed, aanpak en onderwijsmethodiek die hierbij kan helpen. Het is een manier om vanuit een mens-perspectief te kunnen vernieuwen. In deze Design Thinking ‘proeverij’ hebben we gepoogd onze ervaringen met Design Thinking in living labs voor business en management studenten te bundelen met ervaringen van anderen en theorie. Daarvoor hebben we ervaringen van andere hogeschooldocenten die Design Thinking reeds toepas sen in hun onderwijsomgevingen en een praktische vertaling van de theorie over Design Thinking & Doing gebruikt. Met als doel dat jij voor jezelf kunt gaan ontdekken of Design Thinking (& Doing) iets is voor jou, en voor jouw studenten. Wie weet, misschien ontdek je zelfs dat je al een onbewust, bekwame Design Thinker bent.
DOCUMENT
Background: In the Netherlands, the distinction between Bachelor degree and diploma nursing educational levels remains unclear. The added value of Bachelor degree nurses and how they develop professionally after graduation are subject to debate. Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate whether Bachelor degree nurses have higher critical thinking skills than diploma nurses do and whether there is a positive relationship between higher critical thinking skills and self-efficacy beliefs. Outcomes might provide instruments that are helpful in positioning of nursing levels in education and practice. Participants: Questionnaire data were used of a sample of 95 registered mental health staff nurses (62 diploma nurses and 33 Bachelor degree nurses). Methods: First, ANOVAwas performed to testwhether the two groupswere comparablewith respect to elements of work experience. Second, t-tests were conducted to compare the two groups of nurses on self-efficacy, perceived performance and critical thinking outcomes. Third, relationships between the study variables were investigated. Finally, structural equation modelling using AMOS was applied to test the relationships. Results: The hypothesis that Bachelor degree nurses are better critical thinkers than diploma nurseswas supported (pb0.01). Years in function turned out to be positively related to self-efficacy beliefs (pb0.01). No significant relation was found between the level of education and self-efficacy beliefs. Conclusions: The results of this study support career development and facilitate more efficient positioning of nursing levels.
DOCUMENT
The HAS professorship Future Food Systems is performing applied research with students and external partners to transform our food system towards a more sustainable state. In this research it is not only a question of what is needed to achieve this, but also how and with whom. The governance of our food system needs rethinking to get the transformative momentum going in a democratic and constructive manner. Building on the professorship’s research agenda and involvement in the transdisciplinary NWA research project, the postdoc will explore collective ownership and inclusive participation as two key governance concepts for food system transformation. This will be done in a participatory manner, by learning from and with innovative bottom-up initiatives and practitioners from the field. By doing so, the postdoc will gain valuable practical insights that can aid to new approaches and (policy) interventions which foster a sustainable and just food system in the Netherlands and beyond. A strong connection between research and education is created via the active research involvement of students from different study programs, supervised by the postdoc (Dr. B. van Helvoirt). The acquired knowledge is embedded in education by the postdoc by incorporating it into HAS study program curricula and courses. In addition, it will contribute to the further professional development of qualitative research skills among HAS students and staff. Through scientific, policy and popular publications, participation in (inter)national conferences and meetings with experts and practitioners, the exposure and network of the postdoc and HAS in the field of food systems and governance will be expanded. This will allow for the setting up of a continuous research effort on this topic within the professorship via follow-up research with knowledge institutes, civic society groups and partners from the professional field.
The aim of the project is to design, test, refine and deploy a new assessment tool focusing on individual Future Literacy of students. Future Literacy is the ability to produce and process complex visions of the future and make sense thereof. FL is therefore an essential component of any 21st Century Skills set, in the sense that it focuses on the ability of students to prepare themselves for uncertainty and unexpected challenges. At present, the competing concepts of 21st Century Skills have a common denominator in the core idea of fostering personal development of "T-shaped individuals" who have depth in a particular field and breadth in their skill set and thinking. The students' individual ability to "use the future": make sense of emergent reality, deal with complex problems, make decisions based on collective intelligence, plan and prepare for the future, is as important in making educational choices as in taking educated bets concerning their professional, personal and political futures. The project outcome: a new tool for FL assessment will test the feasibility of rigorous measurement, and assessment of FL, to inform better curriculum design and methodological development.
Societal changes force hospitals to improve their patient journeys. And although hospitals and hotels do differ on quite some aspects, there are also a lot of similarities. Moreover, hotels are known for doing their utmost to please their guests and to focus on their guest experiences. Therefore, hospitals are looking at what they can learn form the hotel industry. The Antoniushove is anxious to retain its high quality and where possible to improve it. That is why, together with the Hotelschool, they want to investigate where the patient journey can be improved. Medical students are ‘critical thinkers’ as they are educated in an academic and evidence based environment. Hotelschool students are generally seen as having excellent ‘soft skills’ like creativity and problem solving skills. Critical thinking and soft skills are both seen as important 21st century skills. This research is a first exploration of where there are possibilities for improvement on patient journeys. Couples existing of one medical student and one hotelschool student will form a team and follow breast and colorectal patients during their hospital visit. This combination of students has never occurred before in such a research. It will allow students from both backgrounds to look at the patient journey though the eyes of the other and to learn form each other’s competences. Main research methods to be applied will be shadowing, guided tours and interviews, all of course with informed consent. Medical staff from the Antoniushove and research experts form the hotelschool will supervise the research. This research is a preliminary research for a bigger research and should result in grant proposal for the follow-up research.
