Lecture based on abstract at APNEP congress 2016, Porto.
DOCUMENT
Lecture based on abstract at APNEP congress 2016, Porto.
DOCUMENT
Rationale: The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) is a validated instrument to assess and monitor malnutrition, which consists of both patient-reported and professional-reported items. A professional should be able to correctly interpret all items. Untrained professionals may experience difficulty in completing some items of the PG-SGA. We aimed to explore the change in perceived comprehensibility and difficulty of the Dutch PG-SGA by health care professionals on the use of the instrument, before and after training.Methods: A sample of 36 untrained health care professionals, of which 34 dietitians, completed a set of 29 items on a four point scale regarding comprehensibility and difficulty of the PG-SGA on two separate occasions: T0) two weeks before and T1) directly after an instructional session on the PG-SGA and training with the physical exam. Summarized comprehensibility indexes (SCI) and difficulty indexes (SDI) were calculated for the patient part of the PG-SGA (aka PG-SGA Short Form; PG-SGA SF), the professional part of the PG-SGA (PG-SGApro) and the full PG-SGA, to quantify the level of perceived comprehensibility and difficulty. SCI≥0.80 and SDI≥0.80 were considered acceptable, SCI≥0.90 and SDI≥0.90 were considered excellent.Results: SCI of the PG-SGA SF was acceptable both before (SCI: 0.80) and after training (SCI: 0.89). SCI of the PG-SGApro and full PG-SGA changed from unacceptable (SCI: 0.64; 0.69) to excellent (SCI: 0.95; 0.94). All SDIs changed from unacceptable (SDI for respectively PG-SGA SF, PG-SGApro and full PG-SGA: 0.71; 0.50; 0.57) to acceptable (SDI: 0.88; 0.85; 0.87).Conclusion: Training professionals in the use of the PG-SGA can be an effective strategy for improving the level of both comprehensibility and difficulty.
DOCUMENT
Disease-related undernutrition is highly prevalent and requires timely intervention. However, identifying undernutrition often relies on physician judgment. As Internal Medicine wards are the backbone of the hospital setting, insight into the prevalence of nutritional risk in this population is essential. We aimed to determine the prevalence of nutritional risk in Internal Medicine wards, to identify its correlates, and to assess the agreement between the physicians’ impression of nutritional risk and evaluation by Nutritional Risk Screening 2002.
DOCUMENT
Purpose: The Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) is a validated nutritional screening, assessment, triage, and monitoring tool. The aim of this study was to perform translation, cultural adaptation, linguistic, and content validation of the translated and culturally adapted version of the PG-SGA for the Polish setting. Methods: The study was performed in concordance with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Principles. Patients (n = 174) and healthcare professionals (HCPs, n = 188) participated in the study. Comprehensibility and difficulty were assessed by patients for the PG-SGA Short Form, and by HCPs for the professional component. Content validity was assessed for the full PG-SGA by HCPs only. Evaluations were operationalized by a 4-point scale. Item and scale indices were calculated using the average item ratings divided by the number of respondents. Item indices < 0.78 required further analysis of the item, while scale indices ≥ 0.90 were defined as excellent and 0.80–0.89 as acceptable. Results: The PG-SGA Short Form was rated as excellent for content validity (Scale-CVI = 0.90) by HCPs and easy to comprehend (Scale-CI = 0.96) and use (Scale-DI = 0.94) by patients. The professional component of the PG-SGA was perceived as acceptable for content validity (Scale-CVI = 0.80), comprehension (Scale-CI = 0.87), and difficulty (Scale-DI = 0.80). The physical exam was rated the least comprehensible and the most difficult, and with the lowest content validity. We found significant differences in scale indices (p < 0.05 for all) between HCPs with different professions and between those being familiar with PG-SGA and not. Conclusion: Translation and cultural adaptation of the PG-SGA for the Polish setting preserved the purpose and conceptual meaning of the original PG-SGA. Validation revealed that the Polish version of PG-SGA is well understood and easy to complete by patients and professionals, and is considered relevant by professionals. However, detailed results indicate the need for appropriate training of the Polish HCPs, especially physicians and nurses, mainly in the worksheets related to the metabolic demand and physical exam.
DOCUMENT
INTRODUCTION: The scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) is a validated tool for the screening, assessment and monitoring of malnutrition, and triaging of interventions. It contains a patient-generated component and a healthcare professional (HCP)-generated component.AIM: To translate the PG-SGA into Swedish, assess the linguistic and content validity of the Swedish version, and ensure conceptional, semantic and operational equivalence to the original English PG-SGA.METHODS: In line with the methodology used in previously translated and culturally adapted versions, the standardised 10-step process suggested by the International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) was followed. In step 7, a cross-sectional study targeting patients n = 51 and HCPs n = 52 was performed at a university hospital in Sweden. Using separate questionnaires, patients assessed the patient component and HCPs, the professional component regarding perceived comprehensibility and difficulty (linguistic validity). The HCPs also assessed perceived relevance (content validity) of all items on the PG-SGA. Item indices for comprehensibility (I-CI), difficulty (I-DI) and content validity (I-CVI) were calculated and averaged into scale indices (S-CI, S-DI and S-CVI). Cut-off standards for item and scale indices were used as reference.RESULTS: The Swedish version of the PG-SGA rated excellent for comprehensibility (S-CI 0.96) and difficulty (S-DI 0.93) for the patient component. The professional component rated acceptable for comprehensibility (S-CI 0.89) and below acceptable for difficulty (S-DI 0.70), with the physical examination rated most difficult (I-DI 0.39 to 0.69). Content validity for the full Swedish PG-SGA was rated excellent (S-CVI 0.94).CONCLUSION: The patient component was considered clear and easy to complete. The full Swedish PG-SGA was considered relevant by HCPs for screening and assessment of malnutrition. Due to perceived difficulty with the physical examination, training of Swedish HCPs in using the PG-SGA is essential before implementing the professional component into clinical practice or research.
DOCUMENT
‘Wat is gezonde voeding?’ Deze vraag wordt steeds vaker gesteld, zowel in de media als op het diëtistisch spreekuur. Bij het beantwoorden van deze vraag wijzen invloedrijke critici de autoriteit van de wetenschap af. Waarom wantrouwen mensen wetenschappelijke antwoorden? Waarom moet de diëtist uitleggen dat hij of zij de onderzoeken van de Gezondheidsraad volgt? Waarom zijn de adviezen van het Voedingscentrum problematisch geworden? LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthijs-fleurke-66279110/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/dorien-voskuil-9b27b115/
DOCUMENT
Cliënten, hun naasten en voedingsprofessionals (diëtisten en voedingskundigen) worden geconfronteerd met technologieën gericht op het verbeteren of behouden van gezondheid en/of kwaliteit van leven. Technologieën worden tevens ingezet om de efficiëntie en/of kosteneffectiviteit van zorg te verbeteren. Voorbeelden hiervan zijn beeldschermzorg en ziekte specifieke apps voor de smartphone. De perspectieven van alle betrokkenen in een praktijksituatie in de gezondheidszorg bepalen hoe technologieën gebruikt worden. In dit hoofdstuk worden verschillende perspectieven op technologie, gezondheid en zorg bediscussieerd en worden dilemma’s beschreven die hieruit kunnen ontstaan. Theorie en praktijk tonen het belang van bewust nadenken over de eigen, persoonlijke perspectieven op technologie, gezondheid, voeding en zorg en over perspectieven van anderen. Conclusie: diëtisten en voedingskundigen hebben de verantwoordelijkheid om sensitiviteit te ontwikkelen voor potentiële dilemma’s bij het gebruik van technologieën om daar in de praktijk zorgvuldig mee om te gaan.
DOCUMENT
De eiwittransitie is de transitie van het gebruik van dierlijke eiwitten naar plantaardige eiwitten. Naast de groei van de wereldbevolking en de welvaart, zijn duurzaamheid en dierenwelzijn belangrijke drijfveren achter deze transitie. De bovengenoemde definitie van eiwittransitie geeft gelijk de grenzen van mijn lectoraat aan. Het gaat over de eiwittransitie van dierlijk naar plantaardig. Dit sluit het gebruik van insecten als alternatieve eiwitbron uit van het onderzoek binnen het lectoraat. Insecten zijn dieren, wel is waar met een gunstige voederconversie, maar als dierlijk eiwit draagt de consumptie van insecten niet bij aan de eiwittransitie. De tweede afbakening ligt in de toevoeging ‘in voeding’. Hiermee wordt de focus van mijn lectoraat aangegeven. Binnen mijn lectoraat richten wij ons op de toepassing van plantaardige eiwitten in humane voeding en niet op de toepassing van alternatieve of plantaardige eiwitten in diervoeder. Tot slot, richten wij ons op de eiwittransitie in de volle breedte van de voeding, dus op de vervanging van alle dierlijke eiwitten, zoals die uit melk, ei en vlees.
DOCUMENT
Het position paper verstuurd vanuit het lectorenplatform Voedsel, Voeding & Gezondheid naar de vaste kamercommissie van VWS voor het debat over de afschaffing van de btw op groente en fruit
DOCUMENT
