The field of higher professional educational in the Netherlands is undergoing drastic structural changes. Organizational-wide mergers are commonplace and are often followed by development of new curricula. Furthermore, this is often accompanied by the implementation of a completely new educational concept as well. These structural changes in the educational system require that teachers adapt their current teaching practices, along with working on gaining new competences associated with working in a changing organization. This paper presents a short background of communities of practice in higher education, followed by a report on the first impressions from an experiment in which a bottom-up style of change management has been implemented through the use of a community of practice. A community of practice (CoP) is a powerful knowledge management tool that brings people from a similar domain together in order to solve complex problems, deal with a changing organization and build knowledge around a specific practice. Inholland decided to implement a CoP for the international faculty in order for the members to better cope with the major curricula and didactic changes currently being implemented there. Concepts such as change, organizational sense making and teacher professionalization
Proefschrift van drs. Jeroen Gradener naar de legitimiteit van community development (opbouwwerk). Niet vanzelf krijgen opbouwwerkers een mandaat van bewoners om hen te ondersteunen in het verbeteren van hun eigen leven en hun leefomgeving. Hoe deze opbouwwerkers erin slagen om ondanks weerstanden hun legitimiteit als professional te ontwikkelen is onderwerp van het internationaal vergelijkend promotieonderzoek.
This article draws on Robinson, McNeill and Maruna’s argument (2012) about the adaptability of community sanctions and measures, observed through four distinctive penal narratives, in order to shed light on the regional development of community service in Wroclaw, Poland. While the managerial adaptation of community sanctions is underpinned by an inter-agency cooperation to fulfil the goals of the system, the contemporary rehabilitation iteration has become a toolkit of measures predominantly phrased around risk management, the reparative discourse seeks various means to repair harm, and the punitive orientation represent the turn to desert-based and populist sentencing frameworks. In this article, the first three are reflected upon along with the emerging, restorative adaptation of community sanctions. The last one is added to expand on the findings of previous research, which suggests the viability of the restorative orientation for community service in Poland (Matczak, 2018). A brief discussion of how punishment, probation and restorative justice can be reconciled is followed by the introduction of Polish Probation and the role of probation officers in delivering community service in Poland. Although the penal narratives are visible in the Wrocław model to different degrees and in various combinations, more research is required to evaluate the viability of a progressive orientation to punishment during a gradual optimisation of community orders. Originally published: Anna Matczak, The penal narratives of community sentence and the role of probation: The case of the Wrocław model of community service, European journal of probation (Vol. 13 nr. 1) pp. 72-88. Copyright © 2021year (The Author). DOI: 10.1177/2066220320976105
MULTIFILE
Digital transformation has been recognized for its potential to contribute to sustainability goals. It requires companies to develop their Data Analytic Capability (DAC), defined as their ability to collect, manage and analyze data effectively. Despite the governmental efforts to promote digitalization, there seems to be a knowledge gap on how to proceed, with 37% of Dutch SMEs reporting a lack of knowledge, and 33% reporting a lack of support in developing DAC. Participants in the interviews that we organized preparing this proposal indicated a need for guidance on how to develop DAC within their organization given their unique context (e.g. age and experience of the workforce, presence of legacy systems, high daily workload, lack of knowledge of digitalization). While a lot of attention has been given to the technological aspects of DAC, the people, process, and organizational culture aspects are as important, requiring a comprehensive approach and thus a bundling of knowledge from different expertise. Therefore, the objective of this KIEM proposal is to identify organizational enablers and inhibitors of DAC through a series of interviews and case studies, and use these to formulate a preliminary roadmap to DAC. From a structure perspective, the objective of the KIEM proposal will be to explore and solidify the partnership between Breda University of Applied Sciences (BUas), Avans University of Applied Sciences (Avans), Logistics Community Brabant (LCB), van Berkel Logistics BV, Smink Group BV, and iValueImprovement BV. This partnership will be used to develop the preliminary roadmap and pre-test it using action methodology. The action research protocol and preliminary roadmap thereby developed in this KIEM project will form the basis for a subsequent RAAK proposal.
Context Kernmotto van onze Ambitie 2025 is dat Avans naast een excellente en brede onderwijsinstelling ook kennispartner van de regio wil zijn. De komende jaren krijgt het praktijkgericht onderzoek een stevige boost. Tegelijkertijd is Avans tot nu toe nog maar beperkt zichtbaar geweest in Europese netwerken en programma’s, terwijl dit uitstekende bronnen zijn voor (maatschappelijke) meerwaarde van ons onderzoek, het onderwijs en voor de regio. Strategie De focus van de onderzoeksactiviteiten van Avans ligt op vier Centers of Expertise (CoE), twee expertisecentra en twee doorsnijdende thema’s. Hiermee spelen we in op de regionale, nationale en Europese vraagstukken. Belangrijkste doelstelling van dit project (Avans@EU) is om een strategie te ontwikkelen waarin onze CoE’s, lectoren, (docent-)onderzoekers en studenten op een gestructureerde manier aansluiting kunnen vinden bij de relevante Europese netwerken en programma’s. De lectoren en onderzoekers die beschikken over enige ervaring en een relevant netwerk gebruiken we als ‘lighthouse’ . Netwerken Het op- en uitbouwen van de Europese netwerken is een belangrijke doelstelling voor de CoE’s. De opgave in Avans@EU is daarom het identificeren van de netwerken, het valideren van de aanknopingspunten en het bepalen van de manier waarop aansluiting bij dit netwerk mogelijk is. Supportinfrastructuur Na afloop van het Avans@EU project hebben we een helder beeld van de inrichting van de supportinfrastructuur. Daarbij zetten we een Community of Practice op rondom de EU en een programma om de kennis over Europese programma’s en netwerken bij lectoren en (docent)onderzoekers te vergroten. Regionale Impact De impact die societal challenges (incl. SDG’s) en innovaties gaan hebben op de traditionele(re) industrie in het verzorgingsgebied van Avans is enorm. Door het ontsluiten van de kennis in de genoemde netwerken kan Avans als kennispartner voor het regionale partners dienen en studenten voorzien van actuele kennis.
