Background: Patient decision aids (PDAs) can support the treatment decision making process and empower patients to take a proactive role in their treatment pathway while using a shared decision-making (SDM) approach making participatory medicine possible. The aim of this study was to develop a PDA for prostate cancer that is accurate and user-friendly. Methods: We followed a user-centered design process consisting of five rounds of semi-structured interviews and usability surveys with topics such as informational/decisional needs of users and requirements for PDAs. Our userbase consisted of 8 urologists, 4 radiation oncologists, 2 oncology nurses, 8 general practitioners, 19 former prostate cancer patients, 4 usability experts and 11 healthy volunteers. Results: Informational needs for patients centered on three key factors: treatment experience, post-treatment quality of life, and the impact of side effects. Patients and clinicians valued a PDA that presents balanced information on these factors through simple understandable language and visual aids. Usability questionnaires revealed that patients were more satisfied overall with the PDA than clinicians; however, both groups had concerns that the PDA might lengthen consultation times (42 and 41%, respectively). The PDA is accessible on http://beslissamen.nl/. Conclusions: User-centered design provided valuable insights into PDA requirements but challenges in integrating diverse perspectives as clinicians focus on clinical outcomes while patients also consider quality of life. Nevertheless, it is crucial to involve a broad base of clinical users in order to better understand the decision-making process and to develop a PDA that is accurate, usable, and acceptable.
Analyzing historical decision-related data can help support actual operational decision-making processes. Decision mining can be employed for such analysis. This paper proposes the Decision Discovery Framework (DDF) designed to develop, adapt, or select a decision discovery algorithm by outlining specific guidelines for input data usage, classifier handling, and decision model representation. This framework incorporates the use of Decision Model and Notation (DMN) for enhanced comprehensibility and normalization to simplify decision tables. The framework’s efficacy was tested by adapting the C4.5 algorithm to the DM45 algorithm. The proposed adaptations include (1) the utilization of a decision log, (2) ensure an unpruned decision tree, (3) the generation DMN, and (4) normalize decision table. Future research can focus on supporting on practitioners in modeling decisions, ensuring their decision-making is compliant, and suggesting improvements to the modeled decisions. Another future research direction is to explore the ability to process unstructured data as input for the discovery of decisions.
Objective: To construct the underlying value structure of shared decision making (SDM) models. Method: We included previously identified SDM models (n = 40) and 15 additional ones. Using a thematic analysis, we coded the data using Schwartz’s value theory to define values in SDM and to investigate value relations. Results: We identified and defined eight values and developed three themes based on their relations: shared control, a safe and supportive environment, and decisions tailored to patients. We constructed a value structure based on the value relations and themes: the interplay of healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) and patients’ skills [Achievement], support for a patient [Benevolence], and a good relationship between HCP and patient [Security] all facilitate patients’ autonomy [Self-Direction]. These values enable a more balanced relationship between HCP and patient and tailored decision making [Universalism]. Conclusion: SDM can be realized by an interplay of values. The values Benevolence and Security deserve more explicit attention, and may especially increase vulnerable patients’ Self-Direction. Practice implications: This value structure enables a comparison of values underlying SDM with those of specific populations, facilitating the incorporation of patients’ values into treatment decision making. It may also inform the development of SDM measures, interventions, education programs, and HCPs when practicing.
Middels een RAAK-impuls aanvraag wordt beoogd de vertraging van het RAAK-mkb project Praktische Predictie t.g.v. corona in te halen. In het project Praktische Predictie wordt een prototype app ontwikkeld waarmee fysiotherapeuten in een vroeg stadium het chronisch worden van lage rugpijn kunnen voorspellen. Om chronische rugpijn te voorkomen is het belangrijk om in een vroeg stadium de kans hierop in te schatten door psychosociale en mogelijk andere risicofactoren op chronische pijnklachten te herkennen en hierop te interveniëren. Fysiotherapeuten zijn met deze vraag naar het lectoraat Werkzame factoren in Fysiotherapie en Paramedisch Handelen van de Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen gegaan en dit heeft aanleiding gegeven een onderzoek op te zetten waarin een dergelijke methodiek ontwikkeld wordt. De voorgestelde methodiek betreft een Clinical Decision Support Tool waarmee een geïndividualiseerde kans op chronische rugpijn kan worden bepaald gekoppeld aan een behandeladvies conform de lage rugpijn richtlijn. Hiervoor is eerst geïnventariseerd welke methoden fysiotherapeuten reeds gebruiken en welke in de literatuur worden genoemd. Op basis hiervan is een keuze gemaakt ten aanzien van data die digitaal verzameld worden in minimaal 16 fysiotherapiepraktijken waarbij patiënten gedurende 12 weken gevolgd worden. Met de verzamelde data worden met machine learning algoritmes ontwikkeld voor het berekenen van de kans op chroniciteit. De algoritmes worden ingebouwd in de Clinical Decision Support Tool: een gebruiksvriendelijke prototype app. Bij het ontwikkelen van de tool worden eindgebruikers (fysiotherapeuten en patiënten) intensief betrokken. Op deze manier wordt gegarandeerd dat de tool aansluit bij de wensen en behoeften van de doelgroep. De tool berekent de kans op chroniciteit en geeft een behandeladvies. Daarnaast kan de tool gebruikt worden om patiënten te informeren en te betrekken bij de besluitvorming. Vanwege de coronacrisis is er een aanzienlijke vertraging in de patiënten-instroom (doel n= 300) ontstaan die we met ondersteuning van een RAAK-impuls subsidie willen inlopen.
Developing a framework that integrates Advanced Language Models into the qualitative research process.Qualitative research, vital for understanding complex phenomena, is often limited by labour-intensive data collection, transcription, and analysis processes. This hinders scalability, accessibility, and efficiency in both academic and industry contexts. As a result, insights are often delayed or incomplete, impacting decision-making, policy development, and innovation. The lack of tools to enhance accuracy and reduce human error exacerbates these challenges, particularly for projects requiring large datasets or quick iterations. Addressing these inefficiencies through AI-driven solutions like AIDA can empower researchers, enhance outcomes, and make qualitative research more inclusive, impactful, and efficient.The AIDA project enhances qualitative research by integrating AI technologies to streamline transcription, coding, and analysis processes. This innovation enables researchers to analyse larger datasets with greater efficiency and accuracy, providing faster and more comprehensive insights. By reducing manual effort and human error, AIDA empowers organisations to make informed decisions and implement evidence-based policies more effectively. Its scalability supports diverse societal and industry applications, from healthcare to market research, fostering innovation and addressing complex challenges. Ultimately, AIDA contributes to improving research quality, accessibility, and societal relevance, driving advancements across multiple sectors.
National forestry Commission (SBB) and National Park De Biesbosch. Subcontractor through NRITNational parks with large flows of visitors have to manage these flows carefully. Methods of data collection and analysis can be of help to support decision making. The case of the Biesbosch National Park is used to find innovative ways to figure flows of yachts, being the most important component of water traffic, and to create a model that allows the estimation of changes in yachting patterns resulting from policy measures. Recent policies oriented at building additional waterways, nature development areas and recreational concentrations in the park to manage the demands of recreation and nature conservation offer a good opportunity to apply this model. With a geographical information system (GIS), data obtained from aerial photographs and satellite images can be analyzed. The method of space syntax is used to determine and visualize characteristics of the network of leisure routes in the park and to evaluate impacts resulting from expected changes in the network that accompany the restructuring of waterways.
